...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Fairmont

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When facing the aftermath of a dog bite injury in Fairmont, securing competent legal representation is essential for navigating the complex pathway towards rightful compensation. Within this context, Carlson Bier emerges as an unrivaled leader. Focused exclusively on personal injury law with particular expertise in dog bite injuries, Carlson Bier backs every case with their vast collective experience and unwavering commitment to justice. Whether it involves investigating the incident thoroughly or presenting a meticulously prepared claim on your behalf, this determined team leaves no stone unturned in pursuit of what you deserve.

Beyond comprehensive legal assistance, clients at Carlson Bier are embraced by our culture of compassion and understanding – we know that beneath each case file lies profound human suffering which demands empathy as much as effective legal strategy. Therefore if you’re seeking for seasoned counsel related to dog bite injuries within Fairmont’s jurisdictional boundaries; look no further than us: not just attorneys – but advocates proving every day our ability to guarantee outcome satisfaction while maintaining requisite adherence to Illinois’ strict advertising guidelines regarding geographic claims.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Fairmont Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that the aftermath of a dog bite injury can be an intense time filled with pain and uncertainty. As experts in personal injury law based in Illinois, one of our primary areas of specialty is navigating these complex cases, ensuring they are handled with absolute care and expert knowledge.

An unexpected encounter with an aggressive dog often leads to severe physical injuries along with profound psychological trauma. Our mission at Carlson Bier is not only to represent you in securing just compensation but also to guide you through the process step-by-step, helping mitigate stress and anxiety while you focus on recovery.

When discussing dog bite injuries, it’s essential to note several key points:

* Dog bites can lead to lasting physical damage such as puncture wounds, nerve damage or even severe infections.

* Psychological effects such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), fear and anxiety may arise after a dog bite.

* Medical bills for treating physical wounds from a dog attack can quickly add up; therapy costs for psychological health should also be considered.

* There could be lost wages due to time away from work while recovering from injuries or attending required treatments.

As your legal guides at Carlson Bier, we will thoroughly investigate all aspects revolving around your case. We seek evidence attributing negligence or violation of leash laws leading up to the incident of the dog bite. Applying our understanding of Illinois statutory requirements relating to animal attacks allows us to provide accurate advice on how best you can progress legally after experiencing this traumatic event.

The second critical role we undertake involves accurately estimating the fair amount for personal loss compensation related to medical expenses incurred both immediate and future-wise regarding treatment needs originating from your injury. To clarify further –

* We will carefully consider all associated medical costs like surgeries, medications needed during recovery and reconstructive procedures if necessary.

* Physical Therapy costs following a harmful canine encounter are another vital component in determining compensatory amounts.

To cater comprehensively to all ramifications springing from a dog bite injury, we also take into account the psychological trauma inflicted. Not many comprehend that victims of such incidents often require mental health counseling to help overcome fears and anxiety following their horrific experience.

Allow us, at Carlson Bier, true experts in Illinois’ personal injury law landscape, to vigilantly fight on your behalf. We promise to use every resource available and extend our wide-ranging expertise in seeking rightful compensation for you.

Remember – it’s not just about getting compensated; it’s about finding closure too. That’s where Carlson Bier ensures no stone is left unturned – we advocate vehemently for justice on issues of lost wages due to incapacitation because of an aggressive dog episode or permanent disfigurement caused by severe injuries inflicted during the incident.

At Carlson Bier we are committed in ensuring you receive just recompense which effectively cushions against future implications of your unfortunate accident. While these critical elements exist as a part of our commitment towards utmost professionalism and dedicated service, what sets us apart is that if there are no recoveries made (in monies), then no fees will be charged.

Take control back over your life after experiencing something as unsettling as a dog bite injury; begin by understanding precisely what this can mean financially and legally for you moving forward. Dedicate less time worrying about the complexities of navigating through this ordeal by allowing us, the team at Carlson Bier- YOUR team – to do this on your behalf.

To start taking those first steps towards obtaining justice following an unforeseen canine attack, click the button below. Find how much your case could potentially be worth today!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Fairmont Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Fairmont

Areas of Practice in Fairmont

Cycling Collisions

Dedicated to legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or risky conditions.

Flame Damages

Extending adept legal advice for victims of serious burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Clinical Misconduct

Offering dedicated legal representation for persons affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Liability

Handling cases involving problematic products, delivering professional legal guidance to victims affected by faulty goods.

Senior Neglect

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble & Slip Mishaps

Adept in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal advice to persons seeking restitution for their losses.

Newborn Harms

Supplying legal aid for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Car Accidents

Crashes: Focused on guiding individuals of car accidents receive just recompense for injuries and destruction.

Motorcycle Incidents

Expert in providing legal advice for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

Truck Collision

Extending expert legal assistance for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for losses.

Building Site Collisions

Concentrated on advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Brain Harms

Dedicated to extending compassionate legal support for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Wounds

Proficient in addressing cases for clients who have suffered harms from dog bites or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Specializing in legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Passing

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and experienced legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Spine Harm

Focused on advocating for patients with paralysis, offering expert legal services to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​