...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Fairmount

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the wake of a dog bite injury, it’s crucial to have unparalleled legal representation. Carlson Bier is your premier choice for Illinois-based dog bite injuries law advocacy because we comprehend the complexity of such cases. Navigating insurance specifications and statutes in Fairmount can be perplexing without expert assistance. Our seasoned attorneys are adept at methodically investigating and formulating compelling arguments to ensure you receive fair compensation for pain, suffering or disability caused by a canine attack. We offer tailored consultation while appraising all consequential damages meticulously with proficiency unmatched in this area of personal injury law services. At Carlson Bier, we take immense pride in advocating passionately for our clients’ rights and negotiating just settlements that reflect true sufferings undergone post-incident due to negligent pet owners in Illinois including Fairmount city vicinity. With stellar reputation founded on decades-long proven track records, choosing Carlson Bier essentially means assigning best-of-breed professionals committed to seeking justice fervently on behalf of dog bite victims across Illinois state.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Fairmount Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the trauma and fear suffered by victims of dog bite injuries. As personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, our expertise lies in navigating intricate legalities to secure justice for you. We concentrate on representing dog bite victims, ensuring they get the fair compensation they deserve.

Enlightening ourselves about Dog Bite Injuries is vital in understanding why it must be given serious legal attention. It’s a fact that over 4.5 million people are bitten by dogs each year in the U.S., resulting in approximately 27,000 reconstructive procedures annually according to the American Humane Association (AHA). These unfortunate incidents can lead to major physical damage such as puncture wounds, lacerations, infection risk, scarring or disfigurement, broken or fractured bones and even psychological harm including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

The law recognizes an area under Personal Injury Law called ‘Strict Liability,’ where the responsibility is placed upon pet owners for any harm their animal may inflict. You should know that Illinois ranks high among states with stringent dog bite laws where owner liabilities are concerned. However finding your way through these regulations needs professional aid – which is what we’re here to offer at Carlson Bier.

• Navigating through strict liability under Illinois law.

• Skilled and experienced handling of insurance company negotiations.

• Proficiently battling out court cases if settlement isn’t satisfactory.

As personal injury attorneys well-versed with this aspect of law in Illinois state specifically, we don’t shy away from battling strident insurance companies trying to minimize payouts against claims. Our expert lawyers have succeeded time-and-time again against aggressive insurers securing optimal results for clients’ settlements.

Mitigating costs related to medical care after a traumatic dog-bite incident could take a financial toll on affected individuals and families recovering from injury caused due to someone else’s negligence clearly puts undue burden on victims. This is where hiring a professional like us could become a game-changer for you.

It’s essential for you to understand that dog bite injury cases aren’t just about the physicality of an injury, they’re also about emotional distress and losses. Legal considerations in this regard allow compensation for:

• Medical bills (immediate and future ones)

• Emotional distress

• Lost wages due to inability to work

• Plastic surgeries for disfigured victims

Getting bitten by a dog is traumatic as it is; dealing with the aftermath can be daunting and intimidating. Armed with facts regarding Illinois’ dog bite laws, knowledgeable legal counsel, and ruthless negotiation skills, we at Carlson Bier strive relentlessly towards justice. We believe every victim deserves fair treatment and compensation.

To lay any uncertainties to rest regarding your case, we offer a no-obligation consultation where our attorney will advize on potential avenues moving forward after carefully analyzing specifics of your case. Click below to discover how much your case might be worth; contact us today and let us put our expertise to work while you focus on what truly matters – healing and recovery.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Fairmount Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Fairmount

Areas of Practice in Fairmount

Cycling Crashes

Expert in legal assistance for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Fire Burns

Offering specialist legal services for patients of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Physician Misconduct

Ensuring professional legal services for patients affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Goods Liability

Taking on cases involving problematic products, supplying expert legal services to customers affected by harmful products.

Elder Neglect

Supporting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Fall and Slip Occurrences

Expert in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking restitution for their injuries.

Newborn Wounds

Offering legal support for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Crashes: Dedicated to supporting individuals of car accidents secure appropriate recompense for wounds and losses.

Motorbike Incidents

Expert in providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

Semi Collision

Extending professional legal advice for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair recompense for hurts.

Worksite Incidents

Committed to representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Neurological Damages

Committed to ensuring expert legal advice for victims suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Injuries

Expertise in tackling cases for victims who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Jogger Mishaps

Specializing in legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Undeserved Fatality

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, extending empathetic and professional legal representation to ensure restitution.

Neural Damage

Specializing in advocating for patients with paralysis, offering compassionate legal guidance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​