...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Farmersville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a dog bite injury can be a traumatic and life-altering experience, leaving victims with physical pain, costly medical bills, and significant emotional distress. Carlson Bier attorneys understand the complexities of these cases under Illinois law – they know how to provide results-oriented and empathetic representation to these injured individuals. Based in Illinois, our astute team is renowned for handling numerous successful dog bite injury cases. With their extensive knowledge on animal control laws and regulations related to pet owner responsibilities within Farmersville jurisdictional boundaries, it places them as an invaluable resource during such precarious legal battles. Their impressive record entails securing maximum financial compensation for victims through diligent work ethic paired with strategic acumen – ensuring your health expenses are compensated adequately by guilty parties involved enhances your road to recovery significantly easier . Commandingly focused solely on personal injuries like dog bites makes Carlson Bier attorneys the ideal consideration when seeking comprehensive legal aid post-injury in Farmersville’s confines or elsewhere across Illinois. Trust us; we’re more than just lawyers – we’re advocates committed wholeheartedly towards helping you regain control over your life after enduring such traumatic episodes.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Farmersville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in defending the rights of individuals who have encountered personal injuries related to dog bites. As a trusted and reputable personal injury attorney group based in Illinois, we harness years of legal practice and extensive experience to help you navigate a complex series of laws, regulations, and processes associated with dog bite claims.

Dog bite incidents in Illinois can occur without any provocation or warning. These experiences are often traumatic, leading to significant physical harm and emotional distress for victims. The resulting injuries may require intensive medical treatment such as surgeries or therapies. Such unexpected situations warrant financial compensation that appropriately addresses your suffering and loss.

Illinois law supports the victim’s right through strict liability rules applicable to dog owners responsible for an attack. This means that proof of previous vicious behavior by the dog is not necessary to hold the owner liable for damages incurred from the bite. However, understanding these victims’ rights can be difficult without professional guidance.

Carlson Bier champions clients with key points including:

– Comprehensive clarification about Illinois Dog Bite Law

– Preparation towards a solid foundation for your claim

– Legal representation throughout negotiations with insurance companies

– Pursuit for maximum possible compensation

– Emotional support during this challenging period

We take pride in amplifying your voice while ensuring your lawsuit process remains stress-free as much as possible.

Crucially, it should be understood that there is a statute of limitations on filing dog bite lawsuits in Illinois – generally two years from the date of injury. It typically requires experts to establish liability promptly and represent substantial evidence needed en route litigation success. We understand that quick action is critical – seeking medical attention right away can significantly contribute toward building robust claim cases on time while preserving vital evidence essential for achieving favorable outcomes.

Financial recovery avenues after sustaining a dog bite might include repayment for treatment expenses related directly to injuries (such as emergency care), future medical expenses if long-term disability ensues consequent upon severe injuries; restitution for lost wages due to missed work, compensation for pain and agony endured. It can also cover expenses like psychological counseling if the event leads to trauma-related disorders.

Moreover, public safety is paramount – particularly with respect to children. Although anyone can suffer a dog bite injury, children are especially at risk due to their size and less understanding of how one might provoke a dog unintentionally. Therefore, pursuing legal steps not only aids individual recovery but broadly contributes towards community safety by imposing strict responsibilities amongst pet owners.

Finally, your struggle should not multiply because of doubts about costs concerning legal representation. Carlson Bier operates on a ‘No win-No Fee’ basis where our company’s fees materialize solely when we secure a settlement or court verdict in favor of our clients.

Navigating through this challenging journey alone isn’t necessary. Availability of professional assistance that comprehends intricacies involved within Illinois Dog Bite Laws defaults towards your advantage professionally and personally. Simultaneously it helps expedite monetary relief proactively against an unforeseen dilemma that disrupted your life unjustly.

Uncertain about the value of your case? Our seasoned personal injury attorneys precisely evaluate each detail related to the incident before representing the fair value expected from potential damages involved in successful claims. Developers have integrated a simple-to-use tool available in the interface below capable of providing an initial estimate depending on inputs provided as per proprietary algorithms designed specifically considering prevailing Illinois Trenton laws.

We welcome you to summon courage by clicking on the button below as first steps figuring potential assistance possible towards justice achievement– restoring life normalcy replacing uncertainty with financial security lensing ahead beyond unsettling times justly deserved following traumatic tendencies involuntarily suffered owing unfortunate stances catching unprepared represented professionally en route unparalleled expertise offered exclusively by us–your trusted partners Carlson Bier eagerly anticipating assisting navigate tumultuous paths minimizing stress whilst enhancing prospects throughout journey culmination taking immediate action clicking link underneath ensuring pivotal step embracing new beginnings benefitting insightful intelligence predicting rightful claim possibly available deserving justice receipt today.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Farmersville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Farmersville

Areas of Practice in Farmersville

Bicycle Collisions

Proficient in legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or perilous conditions.

Fire Damages

Offering skilled legal support for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Physician Carelessness

Ensuring specialist legal support for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Accountability

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, supplying professional legal assistance to victims affected by faulty goods.

Elder Abuse

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to misconduct in care facilities environments, ensuring justice.

Fall & Fall Injuries

Adept in dealing with trip accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking restitution for their harm.

Birth Wounds

Supplying legal support for families affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Incidents: Dedicated to supporting patients of car accidents get just settlement for wounds and destruction.

Scooter Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

18-Wheeler Collision

Providing specialist legal advice for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing just compensation for damages.

Construction Site Crashes

Concentrated on defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Head Damages

Dedicated to extending expert legal services for patients suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Injuries

Proficient in tackling cases for people who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Jogger Accidents

Committed to legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Passing

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and professional legal assistance to ensure fairness.

Spine Trauma

Dedicated to advocating for victims with spinal cord injuries, offering compassionate legal guidance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​