FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Medical Malpractice Attorney in Fisher

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you reside in Fisher, Illinois and require the assistance of a seasoned Medical Malpractice attorney, consider Carlson Bier. With years of dedicated practice to personal injury law, our firm has garnered an exceptional reputation for representing and achieving desirable outcomes for victims of medical malpractice. Our skilled attorneys have relentlessly pursued justice against negligent healthcare providers whilst concurrently honoring both ethical standards and Illinois’ legal bounds. We specialize in cases involving surgical errors, wrongful diagnosis or treatment delays that resulted in unnecessary suffering or loss. Why choose us? It is the breadth of real-world experience we bring to your case teamed with our deep understanding of complex health care protocols; but most importantly it’s about how deeply we genuinely care about restoring hope after such devastating events. These qualities differentiate Carlson Bier amidst other legal contenders across Illinois state lines as a strong consideration for anyone requiring a committed advocate during their time of need.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Fisher Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, your personal injury attorney group based in Illinois. Our distinguished team is dedicated to defending the rights of individuals who have been adversely affected by medical malpractice incidents. With a wealth of expertise and commitment to excellence, we aim to lead our clients through the often-confusing intricacies surrounding these unique cases.

Medical malpractice occurs when a healthcare professional, such as a doctor or nurse, neglects their obligation to provide an accepted standard of care resulting in patient harm or suffering. These deviations range from misdiagnosis and surgical errors to birth injuries and wrongful deaths among others. Given the complex nature of such occurrences coupled with legal ramifications, it becomes imperative for victims to seek reliable legal representation capable of effectively advocating on their behalf.

At Carlson Bier, we not only offer extensive knowledge on Illinois laws pertinent to medical malpractice but also apply rigorous strategies aimed at achieving desired outcomes. By recognizing that each case possesses its own nuances and intricacies, our attorneys employ meticulous attention-to-detail as they thoroughly investigate every layer tied with entered allegations.

Importantly, there are key elements involved in building a successful medical malpractice claim:

– Proving there was indeed existing Doctor-Patient Relationship: Without this fundamental aspect being established, any potential claims may be void.

– Evidencing Negligence: The alleged party has deviated from standards typically adhered within the medical community under similar circumstances.

– Linking Injury directly ‘to’ alleged negligence: This essentially entails confirming that patients suffered due to gross misconduct exhibited by healthcare providers.

-Demonstrating real consequential damages: Publicizing demonstrable adverse impacts tied with negligence can significantly strengthen claim legitimacy.

Our law firm understands how emotionally devastating and financially straining these situations can be for victims along with their families which fuels our unwavering dedication towards pursuing fair compensation packages facilitating recovery processes; restoration begins here!

Moreover, Carlson Bier remains highly vigilant pertinent statutory limits (Statute of Limitations) involved with initiating medical malpractice claims within Illinois. Legal frameworks dictate that victims often have a maximum two-year window from when an injury was first identified as not doing so within this stipulated period could potentially bar any sought restitution.

Considering the sensitive, multifaceted characteristics permeating these cases, we prioritize comprehensive client guidance ensuring they comprehend every step tied to their journey for justice. Consequently, Carlson Bier embodies a devoted advocate for your rights during what can undoubtedly be a trying time ‘also’ holding accountable medical professionals failing to uphold their practice’s standard obligations; remember you are NOT ALONE in this ordeal.

Your faith placed upon our law firm is something we deeply cherish and honor; Hence, we tirelessly work towards meeting expectations accompanying desired results securing full compensation for injuries sustained due to evident healthcare negligence. Carlson Bier remains steadfast amidst complexities promising unrelenting legal support reinforcing your fight against unjustified suffering vowing to never accept less than YOU rightfully deserve!

If you or a loved one has unfortunately fallen victim to medical malpractice incident/s, let us help guide your path towards recovery by diligently orchestrating careful legal strategies aiming at claiming deserved compensatory amounts championing both individual rights while concurrently imposing restorative justice!

Finally yet most importantly, know YOUR potential claim’s monetary worth. How much could your case possibly retrieve? Dependent on varying factors such as incurred damages (pecuniary/non-pecuniary), obtained evidence supporting allegations alongside plausibility pertaining collected testimonies among other aspects – each elemental detail could ultimately alter prospective compensational figures in direct correlation.

Click the button below now; allow us the privilege of evaluating accurate estimations encapsulating potential restitution available capturing visible representation of YOUR DUE Justice! Remember today’s action guarantees tomorrow’s compensation – it begins at Carlson Bier where RESULTS COUNT!.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Fisher Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Fisher

Areas of Practice in Fisher

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Focused on legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Scald Traumas

Offering specialist legal help for individuals of intense burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Medical Incompetence

Offering expert legal representation for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Liability

Addressing cases involving unsafe products, delivering specialist legal help to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Neglect

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble & Slip Mishaps

Professional in tackling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to persons seeking redress for their damages.

Childbirth Harms

Delivering legal guidance for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Car Crashes

Mishaps: Devoted to supporting clients of car accidents obtain appropriate payout for harms and harm.

Bike Accidents

Focused on providing legal services for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

Truck Crash

Providing professional legal assistance for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for harms.

Construction Collisions

Focused on defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Cognitive Harms

Specializing in delivering professional legal support for victims suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Traumas

Skilled in handling cases for people who have suffered traumas from dog bites or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Accidents

Dedicated to legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Passing

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering caring and experienced legal assistance to ensure justice.

Neural Damage

Committed to assisting persons with paralysis, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440