Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Flanagan

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve been a victim of a pedestrian accident in Flanagan, seeking the best legal representation should be your utmost priority. It’s essential to entrust your case with experienced professionals who possess both the skills and tenacity to fight for your rights. Introducing Carlson Bier – an eminent personal injury law firm known for its dedicated services in Illinois. We specialize in Pedestrian Accident cases, determined to obtain maximum compensation for our clients’ injuries caused by wrongful acts or carelessness of others on the road. Our attorneys leverage their extensive experience, deep understanding of Illinois laws, and relentless advocacy skills aiming at securing optimal results for each client we serve. Choosing us means getting unsurpassed legal counsel from start through finish – comprehensive case evaluation, smart negotiation strategies against insurance companies or aggressive courtroom representation if needed! Don’t take chances with pedestrian accidents; come to Carlson Bier – where proficient lawyers ensure access to justice isn’t just a promise but practice! Trust excellence; trust Carlson Bier!

About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Flanagan Illinois

Navigating the complex legal landscape following an unfortunate pedestrian accident can be a daunting task. You are not alone – at Carlson Bier, we’re here to expertly guide you through. As an esteemed personal injury attorney group based in Illinois, our mission is undeniably focused on advocating for your rights and ensuring justice as promptly as possible. Specializing in personal injury law, specifically pedestrian accidents, our team brings to the table extensive experience and a commitment to delivering unrivaled representation.

Pedestrian accidents frequently result from recklessness or negligence of motor vehicle drivers. Among these situations are instances where motorists fail to yield right-of-way at crosswalks, distracted driving conditions like texting while driving or operating under influence (DUI), and overly speeding vehicles contributing towards severe collisions.

Understanding your rights after such traumatic encounters becomes crucial. Here’s what you need to know:

• In many cases, victims aren’t aware that they legally have two years from the date of accident occurrence to set forth their claim – known as a statute limitation period.

• As opposed to traffic violations where proof needs ‘beyond reasonable doubt,’ suing for personal injuries only necessitates ‘preponderance of evidence’ indicating defendant’s act was more likely than not responsible for injuries sustained.

• Recoverable damages can go beyond just medical expenses; potentially extending into lost wages due to time off work during recovery phase, non-material losses linked with pain & suffering endured by victims, along with future medical bills arising from post-accident complexities.

At Carlson Bier, every case is treated distinctly -filtered through the lens of precise fact-checking and thorough analysis ensuring legitimate complaints aren’t disadvantaged by insurance companies aiming solely for minimized payouts at victim’s expense. Our proactive approach ensures optimal outcomes – commencing initial consultations completely free of charge right onto undertaking rigorous investigations unraveling full scenarios empowering us negotiate diligently enforcing accountability over careless motorists we encounter.

Victims often feel helpless dealing with intense aftermaths of pedestrian accidents – whether it’s navigating through medical scenarios or grueling insurance paperwork. Carlson Bier ensures you’re not alone in this commitment to justice. We firmly believe that no one should be left to suffer due to someone else’s negligence. Guided by empathy, we integrate comprehensive legal expertise and tenacity coupled with an adamant desire to fight for the compensation you rightfully deserve.

Our competent team is willingly available throughout every stage and milestone within your litigation process, partnering with our clients dedicatedly right from initial consultation, aggravating negotiation processes continuing onto unpredictable trial phases if necessary. This staunch commitment remains constant irrespective of case complexity or duration taken towards hoped settlement.

Carlson Bier specializes in ensuring the rights of pedestrians involved in these unfortunate incidents are defended vigorously; relentlessly pursuing fair compensation from guilty parties required towards relieving burdens attributed by their heinous actions. Our specialized knowledge in intricately handling such cases pooled alongside continuous dedication reflecting years invested mastering personal injury law empowers us procure restitution precisely tailored matching individual client necessities.

We encourage all victims seeking rightful representation leaning heavily on winning pedestrian accident-related compensations to trust our proven competence at Carlson Bier. Accidents might happen without any warning, but having a dependable attorney group advocating for your justice isn’t an accident – let us help you recover maximum compensation possible marking first steps heading into brighter futures partially overshadowed by unbecoming events forming your present predicaments.

As you continue browsing through our website comprehending extensive assistance we can extend in seeing through adverse outcomes following unfortunate pedestrian accidents, why not take a momentary pause: Click on the button below now–find out just how much your case could potentially be worth?

Stand tall against those culpable for inconvenient disruptions introduced interrupting seamless flows in your life–at Carlson Bier; rest assured knowing honestly untangling complex legal processes subsequent traumatic pedestrian involvements gradually becomes second nature due diligently mastering years of hands-on exposure. Taking that first step towards lawful redemption doesn’t need to be intimidating–allow us help elevate you above circumstances merely weighing down your deserved liberations.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Flanagan Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Flanagan

Areas of Practice in Flanagan

Bicycle Mishaps

Focused on legal representation for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or risky conditions.

Scald Traumas

Giving expert legal support for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Physician Carelessness

Delivering dedicated legal advice for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Responsibility

Managing cases involving defective products, providing expert legal assistance to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip and Stumble Mishaps

Professional in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking redress for their suffering.

Infant Traumas

Delivering legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Car Crashes

Mishaps: Devoted to supporting sufferers of car accidents get fair compensation for injuries and losses.

Motorcycle Crashes

Specializing in providing legal assistance for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

Truck Incident

Extending expert legal assistance for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for harms.

Construction Collisions

Dedicated to supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Brain Damages

Expert in ensuring expert legal assistance for persons suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Injuries

Expertise in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered injuries from dog bites or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Specializing in legal support for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Unfair Fatality

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and professional legal representation to ensure justice.

Neural Trauma

Dedicated to defending clients with spinal cord injuries, offering dedicated legal representation to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer