FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Flora

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When involved in a pedestrian accident, consider employing the expert services of Carlson Bier. As an esteemed personal injury law firm based in Illinois, we specialize in protecting your rights as a pedestrian victim. Backed by years of experience and an impressive success rate, we are equipped to handle any case — big or small. Knowing that every situation is unique and demands detailed attention; our primary focus is to achieve justice for those affected by pedestrian accidents. Accidents can be devastating both physically and emotionally; it’s reassuring to have a qualified legal team like ours on your side. We diligently serve Flora with top-tier representation – providing quality advice while responding efficiently to emotional and financial needs after such incidents occur.

Choosing Carlson Bier means placing trust in professionals, who strive tirelessly pursuing the best possible outcome for you while making this process less overwhelming. Although not physically located within Flora city limits, our commitment reaches across without boundaries ensuring thorough support wherever needed — because at Carlsson Bier every person matters! Trust us with building resilience against any obstacles that stand between you and justice!”

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Flora Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our specialists in personal injury law have a deep understanding of the unexpected and often shattering impacts of pedestrian accidents. With the vast responsibility shared by both pedestrians and drivers alike, Illinois laws hold meticulous regard for ensuring safety on all terrains – sidewalks, crosswalks, and roads. However, when unfortunate incidents happen, it’s only right that you’re well-informed about your rights with accurate information from experts like us at Carlson Bier.

In Illinois, accidents involving pedestrians are not uncommon due to high foot traffic throughout various busy streets. It is important to understand what constitutes such an accident; this generally refers to any collision between a vehicle (car, motorcycle or bicycle) and an individual on foot. In many cases, these accidents result in severe injuries or even fatalities given the vulnerability of pedestrians against motor-powered metal bodies.

• Negligence is usually a root cause- Driver negligence forms a significant category responsible for pedestrian incidents which includes disregard for traffic controls or speed limits, substance abuse while driving or using mobile devices etc.

• Pedestrian behavior plays its part too- Although drivers should be watchful at all times for their surroundings including individuals on foot; however certain pedestrian actions could contribute towards potential collisions like neglecting crosswalk rules or reckless road crossing.

An important point to remember is that every case has unique circumstances determining who bears liability. Even if the victim unknowingly contributed towards events leading up to an accident doesn’t mean they forfeit rights to claim compensation entirely.

When faced with such peculiar situations following unprecedented pedestrian accidents, guidance from legal litigators specializing in personal injury claims become indispensable. This is where we step in – At Carlson Bier, our experienced attorneys will review your case closely offering clear insights into complexities involved through extensive investigation and recourse to legal resources available under Illinois jurisdiction.

We firmly believe that being adequately informed regarding one’s rightful entitlements helps make sensible decisions during such testing times. Our diligent team at Carlson Bier places great importance in offering comprehensive counsel basing claims on substantial evidence gathered post-accidents while safeguarding your interests.

• Thorough Investigation of Incident Scene – Our personal injury attorneys move promptly organizing a meticulous examination of the accident site, liaising with relevant authorities and arranging precise accident reconstruction if necessary.

• Preservation and Analysis Evidence – Ranging from vehicle damage, driver records to CCTV or dashcam footage; every bit counts towards presenting a strong case.

• Medical Documentation – Providing accurate recording of all injuries incurred coupled with estimated costs for current and possible future treatments aiding ardent crisis management.

• Accounting for Full Recovery Costs – Calculating potential life-altering implications this could have factoring not just physical injuries but also paycheck losses due to mandatory off-days, mental trauma along as well as lifestyle adaptations imposed post such setbacks.

Therefore, remember that you don’t shoulder the burden alone after grappling with a pedestrian accident; we at Carlson Bier are readily equipped to offer decisive legal aid ensuring rightful compensation at every step.

It is our fervent hope that none must face consequences of being blindsided by such unanticipated incidents; however, should you find yourself seeking legal advice following pedestrian accidents: Help is merely a click away! For an understanding regarding potential claim value in terms pertaining specifically towards unique circumstances surrounding your case, feel free to get in touch with us today. Just click on the button below and find out how Carlson Bier’s trustworthy Personal Injury Attorneys can guide you through Road Accident claims securely ensuring peace amid chaos.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Flora Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Flora

Areas of Practice in Flora

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Dedicated to legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or perilous conditions.

Scald Wounds

Giving specialist legal advice for victims of serious burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Hospital Incompetence

Ensuring professional legal services for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Obligation

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, supplying expert legal support to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Malpractice

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble & Stumble Accidents

Specialist in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to persons seeking restitution for their injuries.

Infant Harms

Delivering legal guidance for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Crashes

Incidents: Focused on assisting individuals of car accidents receive equitable remuneration for damages and impairment.

Bike Incidents

Specializing in providing legal services for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

18-Wheeler Collision

Extending adept legal assistance for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for damages.

Worksite Incidents

Focused on defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Brain Damages

Specializing in offering expert legal assistance for patients suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Injuries

Specialized in tackling cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from dog bites or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Incidents

Specializing in legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering damages.

Unfair Death

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and professional legal assistance to ensure fairness.

Neural Impairment

Committed to supporting clients with paralysis, offering expert legal services to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​