FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Flossmoor

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

Choose Carlson Bier when you need an exceptional attorney group to handle your spinal cord injury claim. We possess years of experience representing victims in Flossmoor and throughout Illinois. Our devotion to clients, tenacity for justice and keen understanding of personal injury laws have transcendently positioned us as esteemed releases for spinal cord injuries-related suits.

We believe that comprehensive litigation can make a huge difference in the aftermath of such devastating events. Every case we undertake is scrutinized meticulously to ensure our strategies align wholly with individual interests while keeping within legal confines.

At Carlson Bier, we are deeply sympathetic about the extensive physical, emotional and financial toll this ailment bestows on victims alongside their families’ wellbeing too. Hence, it’s our firm commitment to drive fair compensation that covers medical bills both present and future needs beginning from rehabilitation up until life care plans ensuring substantial relief is extended usually beyond expectation.

Our dedicated team at Carlson Bier not only thrives on unrivaled courtroom success but equally emphasizes empathetic client relationships over time fostering mutual trust which eventually leads towards desired outcomes – healing through rightful assistance.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Flossmoor Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, your dedicated personal injury attorney group here in Illinois. Our team of highly skilled and experienced lawyers is on hand to help you navigate the often-complex world of legal rights and compensation claims, with our specialist focus being on Spinal Cord Injuries(SCI). This specific kind of personal injury brings with it unique aspects which require a nuanced understanding for effective representation; understanding that we at Carlson Bier possess through years of aiding countless clients.

A spinal cord injury can drastically alter one’s life, leading to significant physical challenges and potentially massive financial burdens. At heart, SCI typically results from a severe blow or damage to one’s spine or vertebrae. Vehicular accidents, falls, gunshot wounds, sporting accidents are among its main causes. And these injuries can result in full or partial paralysis, pain or even difficulty breathing.

• Full Paralysis: Known as tetraplegia or quadriplegia, this involves loss of movement and sensation in all four limbs.

• Partial Paralysis: Termed paraplegia where individuals retain some form of function or feeling.

• Regional Pain: Some SCI victims endure chronic pain due to nerve damage.

• Difficulty breathing: Damage higher up in the spine near the neck can affect nerves controlling lung function.

Navigating life post-spinal cord injury demands resilience but also represents a journey where legal support becomes key – especially when financial recompense can be sought from liable parties; offering some relief amidst adversity.

At Carlson Bier we strive to walk step-for-step with you along this path – bringing seasoned legal expertise paired with compassionate care. We work tirelessly within Illinois law parameters to secure the best possible outcome for every client; fighting for their righty deserved monetary relief for pain endured both physical and emotional alongside compensating any loss in earning capacity while covering medical expenses too.

Our commitment extends beyond just the hearing room. To empower those facing SCI battle firsthandly, we have at the ready extensive resources and connections within the healthcare industry. This allows us to refer our clients to some of the best medical professionals for their ongoing care – a vital facet that often goes overlooked in favor of immediate financial considerations.

Despite this wealth of knowledge and experience under our belt, we never lose sight of the personal aspect inherent in each SCI case. Our approach is founded on an understanding that every client’s situation is unique, thus requiring tailored solutions rather than a one-size-fits-all strategy. Be it an initial consultation or representing you in court, expect from Carlson Bier a high degree of commitment matched with utmost respect toward your individual journey.

What sets ourselves apart from other law firms is not just our deep expertise but our dedication to educating you about all aspects related to your case; arming you with knowledge which aids informed decision making when battling SCI induced adversity.

The team at Carlson Bier recognizes how devastating a spinal cord injury can be – both physically and emotionally – but we also understand that no challenge should be faced alone especially one fraught with legal complexities. So if or know someone dealing with such personal trauma remember Carlson Bier stands ready providing compassionate representation coupled with focused, powerful advocacy aimed at finding justice while helping ease these life-shifting burdens as much as possible.

Should you wish to connect further make sure avail yourself of information right here on our webpage whereupon clicking the button below will offer insights into what value your claim might hold – outlying potential directives your case could take along its pathway towards resolution ensuring no stone left unturned during evaluation process by expert eyes yearning for justice.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Flossmoor Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Flossmoor

Areas of Practice in Flossmoor

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Proficient in legal assistance for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or risky conditions.

Fire Wounds

Giving skilled legal assistance for patients of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Healthcare Misconduct

Extending professional legal representation for persons affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Commodities Responsibility

Managing cases involving unsafe products, offering skilled legal support to customers affected by defective items.

Nursing Home Abuse

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Tumble & Slip Mishaps

Adept in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking recovery for their harm.

Newborn Traumas

Providing legal assistance for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Accidents

Mishaps: Concentrated on guiding individuals of car accidents get appropriate compensation for wounds and damages.

Scooter Crashes

Committed to providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for losses.

Semi Collision

Providing expert legal services for drivers involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair claims for injuries.

Construction Site Mishaps

Committed to advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Brain Traumas

Expert in offering specialized legal advice for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Injuries

Adept at handling cases for people who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Jogger Incidents

Focused on legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering recovery.

Unjust Loss

Working for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering sensitive and expert legal assistance to ensure fairness.

Spine Injury

Specializing in supporting patients with paralysis, offering professional legal services to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440