FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Forest Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you are a resident of Forest Park and have unfortunately experienced a dog bite injury, the expert attorneys at Carlson Bier can offer their legal expertise. Having handled numerous cases on the perils of such injuries, we fully understand the traumatic aftermath and complex litigation it may involve. Our paramount goal is to ensure that victims like you are adequately compensated for medical expenses, lost wages, pain, suffering and other related costs. Being adept in Illinois state laws pertaining to dog bites allows us monitor your case’s progress meticulously while navigating various procedural requirements with ease. Accelerating towards justice without compromise over quality sets our firm apart from others in this difficult time of need; thus making us an ideal ally when seeking damages for any untoward incidents involving man’s best friend turning foesome predator. Trust Carlson Bier – proficient in giving voice to silent victims against negligent owners’ uncontrolled pets via diligent legal marathons underpinned by unwavering ethical standards!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Forest Park Illinois

At the Carlson Bier Law Firm, we understand that incidents like dog bite injuries are a shock for victims and their families. Located in Illinois, our dedicated team of personal injury attorneys serve clients with exceptional representation after traumatic experiences like those caused by canine aggression.

Every year in the United States, approximately 4.5 million individuals become victims of dog bites; your case is not an isolated one. Understandably, it can be quite alarming to face such an occurrence given that dogs are often considered part of our families and communities. Dogs may attack due to several reasons – provocation, perceived threats or uncontrolled aggression being some instances. Regardless of the reason why you suffered this unfateful incident, you should be aware that legal avenues exist to seek compensation for resulting harms incurred to your physical health & financial wellbeing.

Dog bite injuries can vary widely in severity—ranging from minor scratches to severe lacerations or even fatal attacks—incurring probable medical expenses ranging from emergency care costs and surgical procedures to psychological therapy sessions aimed at mitigating resultant trauma. Here’s where we come into play: at Carlson Bier Law Firm, what sets us apart is out exacting attention-to-detail and client-centric approach towards each case—an incorporation stemming from understanding how crucial it is for us to adopt strategies aligning with the needs and life situations faced by dog-bite sufferers like yourself.

Now comes an important question: Are you eligible for a claim? There are numerous possible scenarios:

• You were publicly accessible when bitten without any provocation

• The pet’s owner violated local “leash laws” during the incident

• Past records showcase harmful behavior occurred previously

Regardless of your circumstance falling under one these categories listed above or having a unique facet in comparison; our experienced lawyers would ensure all factors get diligent consideration throughout building up a formidable lawsuit against the perpetrator.

Our commitment as your representative goes beyond eerily spoken promises regarding winning claims on your behalf. Other than that, we understand and respect your concern about legal expenses which may add to an already financially draining situation. Hence, distinguishing us further in our approach is the way we process fees – strictly based on successful outcomes of cases handled; no win equates to no fees.

An aspect worth emphasizing here revolves around the limitations period- two years from the date of incident as mandated by Illinois law for filing such lawsuits. It’s essential not to delay in seeking legal help if you think you have a claim.

Even though it may seem daunting at first, understand that laws are designed keeping view of protecting citizens’ rights in scenarios where one faces harm caused due to other’s negligent or intentional conduct. These regulations aren’t represented solely as abstract text pieces penned under constitutional directives, but rather exist as actionable channels through which justifiable claims reach rightful resolution.

No words can truly encapsulate unease enveloping victims during injury aftermaths—projected fears coupled with pain experienced; worry concerning compensations whatnot! Here’s where perception makes all difference and being guided rightly becomes indispensable. This understanding stands central within every case handled at Carlson Bier Law Firm bolstering our endeavor towards advocating uncompromised justice for dog-bite victims alike yourself: devoted attorneys instilling confidence within clients placed at plaintive end caught midst unanticipated events triggered by canine aggression incidents.

The journey up ahead might seem arduous; however please remember—you’re not alone… Carlton Bier is serving here on your side! Be rest assured – together, we shall take suitable steps forward & witness situations transforming favorably in alignment with realization expected rights and deserved reparations necessary for your recuperation ahead!

Your next step? Take advantage of our free consultation feature available right now – grab opportunity exploring viable options laying open right before you (worth re-iterating: at zero cost)! While clicking through the button provided below- do bear remembrance regarding unique spirit underlining this provision: finding out possibility of how much your case is worth! Your journey towards justice begins here – at Carlson Bier!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Forest Park Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Forest Park

Areas of Practice in Forest Park

Bike Mishaps

Specializing in legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or risky conditions.

Scald Wounds

Giving skilled legal assistance for people of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or misconduct.

Physician Incompetence

Offering experienced legal advice for persons affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Liability

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, supplying professional legal assistance to victims affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Neglect

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Trip & Trip Occurrences

Professional in managing stumble accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking restitution for their injuries.

Newborn Traumas

Supplying legal guidance for families affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Mishaps: Devoted to guiding sufferers of car accidents receive reasonable remuneration for wounds and harm.

Scooter Mishaps

Specializing in providing representation for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

Trucking Accident

Delivering specialist legal advice for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful claims for harms.

Construction Site Crashes

Dedicated to assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Cognitive Traumas

Committed to extending expert legal representation for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Traumas

Expertise in tackling cases for individuals who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Committed to legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Unfair Demise

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and expert legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Spinal Cord Damage

Expert in defending patients with paralysis, offering professional legal assistance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​