FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Forrest

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one has suffered from dog bite injuries in Forrest, securing expert legal assistance is crucial. Consider Carlson Bier – an esteemed Illinois-based personal injury lawyer firm renowned for its exceptional handling of dog bite cases. With unwavering dedication to justice, our experienced attorneys work relentlessly to safeguard your rights and ensure maximum compensation. Our extensive knowledge of the complex Illinois dog bite laws enables us to strategize effectively and navigate confidently through the intricacies of each case. We’re not merely lawyers; we are compassionate individuals deeply committed to making a difference during challenging times following distressing incidents like dog bites. Trust Carlson Bier – where every client matters immensely, every case receives personalized attention, and every verdict reflects our profound expertise in defending victims of dog bite injuries in Forrest. Reach out today – let’s fight together for what’s rightfully yours!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Forrest Illinois

Injuries resulting from dog bites can be distressing and debilitating, not only physically but emotionally too. They can result in significant medical costs, time away from work, and considerable pain and anguish. Here at Carlson Bier, we understand the rigors associated with these unfortunate incidents. With our exceptional expertise in personal injury law throughout Illinois, we offer committed representation for victims of dog bite injuries.

Dog bites can lead to severe injuries such as lacerations, punctures, fractures or even infections like rabies. Other complications include nerve damage or psychological trauma that could last for several months or more following an attack. Victims are often burdened by extensive hospital stays, surgeries, rehabilitation therapies and counseling sessions – leading to mounting medical bills which if unchecked could plunge families into deep despair due to financial burdens.

When you’re a victim of a dog attack in Illinois, it’s important that you know your rights:

• Seek immediate medical attention.

• Report the incident promptly to

your local animal control officials.

• Document all details pertinent

about the attack – this includes

taking photographs of your injuries,

noting circumstances of the incident

and gathering witness statements if

available.

Illinois adopts a ‘strict liability’ statute when handling dog bite cases – meaning that pet owners are held liable for any harm their dogs inflict upon others without needing proof of prior vicious behavior on part of their pets. This means that as long as you were conducting yourself peaceably with no provocation towards the animal on public property (or legally present on private property) – you have legal justification under Illinois’ Animal Control Act to seek compensation for sustained damages irrespective of whether the owner was negligent or not.

Navigating through such claims isn’t easy though; many variables may come into play such as comparative fault (if applicable), pre-existing conditions etc., making it crucial for any plaintiff to entrust professionals like us at Carlson Bier to guide them through these complexities.

At Carlson Bier, we have a team of dedicated personal injury attorneys who know the intricate ins-and-outs of Illinois’ dog bite laws and will tirelessly fight for you. It’s disheartening when victims fail to secure suitable recovery due merely to lack of information or professional legal guidance – this is where we come in; ensuring that your rights are meticulously protected throughout proceedings.

Understanding that each case is unique, our approach begins with an exhaustive evaluation of the circumstances surrounding your incident – collecting crucial facts needed for establishing strength in negotiations and if need be litigation. We work closely with medical professionals to ensure all care needs are well documented enhance your claim as it minimally should cover: medical expenses (both current and ongoing), lost wages, pain suffering plus emotional distress.

Dealing with any personal injury can indeed be overwhelming but rest assured you’re not alone; at Carlson Bier we’re committed to relentlessly pursuing the best possible outcome for you. Because ultimately what matters isn’t just getting compensated but also feeling truly vindicated – knowing that justice has been served.

Canine attacks undeniably leave scars which may last a lifetime but remember – so too does justice deliver its essential healing touch helping you move beyond this painful experience. Interested in exploring further how much value Carlson Bier can bring towards resolving your dog bite case thoroughly? Click on the button below now and little by little begin reclaiming back trust in life’s beautiful unfolding narrative.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Forrest Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Forrest

Areas of Practice in Forrest

Bicycle Accidents

Proficient in legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Burn Burns

Extending adept legal help for individuals of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Medical Carelessness

Ensuring dedicated legal assistance for persons affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Accountability

Managing cases involving unsafe products, providing skilled legal services to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Abuse

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Trip and Trip Incidents

Adept in dealing with tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking compensation for their harm.

Birth Wounds

Supplying legal assistance for families affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Car Crashes

Crashes: Focused on aiding victims of car accidents obtain reasonable compensation for damages and losses.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal advice for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Truck Collision

Offering professional legal advice for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for harms.

Construction Accidents

Focused on defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Brain Impairments

Focused on ensuring compassionate legal representation for patients suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Traumas

Specialized in tackling cases for individuals who have suffered harms from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Dedicated to legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Undeserved Passing

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and expert legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Expert in representing clients with spine impairments, offering specialized legal support to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440