Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Forsyth

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from dog bite injuries in Forsyth? Your search for rightful compensation and reliable representation ends with Carlson Bier. Renowned across Illinois, our team brings unparalleled expertise to the forefront of personal injury law, pioneering advocacy for victims of dog bites. The attorneys at Carlson Bier hold an impressive record of successful cases, compelling outcomes acquired through aundant knowledge-driven strategies and ceaseless commitment. Our proven process involves thorough investigations to establish liability coupled with aggressive negotiation with insurance companies on your behalf to ensure maximum compensation is secured. Choosing us guarantees meticulous attention to detail, unwavering dedication and a tireless pursuit towards justice that resonates in every victorious adjudication we undertake for you. At Carlson Bier, client satisfaction is paramount – our needs-centric approach customizes resolutions considering each specific situation’s unique aspects while prioritizing emotional sensitivity during difficult times such as these which keeps us ahead as your optimal respect-worthy counselor amidst all Dog Bite Injuries lawyers across Illinois.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Forsyth Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the overwhelming physical and emotional toll a dog bite injury can inflict. Our Illinois-based team is dedicated to supporting you through this arduous journey towards recovery by advocating for your rights as a personal injury victim. Our focus is not just limited to obtaining adequate compensation for the immediate medical costs involved, but also assessing future potential damages such as infection risks, psychological trauma, possible requirement of therapeutic interventions and even physical rehabilitation in more severe cases.

A significant aspect that deserves attention here is the possibility of infection. Following a traumatic incident like a dog bite:

• The risk of bacterial contamination is very high.

• Nearly 18% victims experience infection post-bite.

• The bacteria Pasteurella spp often contributes to serious joint conditions.

Recognizing these repercussions reinforces our determination at Carlson Bier to ensure justice prevails by tenaciously representing your case in court. We endeavor to collate extensive evidence demonstrating negligence on the part of the dog owner or probable causes pushing the animal towards violent behavior – be it related to prior attack patterns or lack of leash norms adherence under state statutes.

The psychological impacts are another key area that legally figure significantly when building your case:

• Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)

• Fear/phobia

• Depression

These mental health conditions should be addressed with gravity equal to physical injuries because they might require long-term therapy or counseling that comes with substantial financial burden.

Many fall prey to common misconceptions about their situation post such an unfortunate happening:

• Dog owners aren’t liable if there’s no history: Inadequate! Under Illinois law Sec. 16., irrespective of whether or not pet has exhibited aggressive tendencies before, owners are held accountable for injuries inflicted upon another person without provocation.

• Not providing medical attention after minor bites: No abrasion or laceration should be taken lightly since even minor wounds could lead to grave infections if untreated timely.

Knowledge of these fallacies forms a significant defense base that lends leverage in procuring what you rightfully deserve.

A group specializing in personal injury law, Carlson Bier, diligently works to advocate for victims and their rights. Our litigation strategy is tailored individually as per the nuances involved in each case – whether it relates to seeking maximal compensation under premises liability insurance or negotiating settlements with dog owners under strict liability statutes that abide by societal safety norms. With decades of experience at our disposal combined with sensitivity towards your traumatic ordeal, we promise relentless representation ensuring a fair outcome encouraging optimal rehabilitation.

A consultation period follows this procedure via which potential damages are outlined alongside pinpointing liable parties against whom claim needs to be filed using Illinois’ statute limitations standing as guidance.

Comprehending legal laws after experiencing trauma can be overwhelming indeed; thereby resting such concerns onto us is an intelligent decision that’ll ensure a quicker road towards recovery. No one should bear excessive financial burden due to another’s negligence; hence our legal team endeavors tirelessly ensuring you’re compensated aptly easing necessary arrangements regarding medical care, including psychological aid required.

Inviting you now to take control of your situation by believing in the promise Carlson Bier offers its clients – justice will not only be duly served but also put forth within substantial monetary terms underlining the quantifiable impact your plight has had on your life’s quality. Let us work together towards molding this retribution into reality – click on the button below right away! This unique opportunity grants insight into how much realizing worth attached towards occurring pain, suffering alongside various incurred costs post this unfortunate event unfolds legally. The first step symbolizes claiming power back irrespective of how daunting future appears presently- initiating strengthening process from unfavorable position gradually onto path frictionless rightful recuperation embedding optimism until reality matches vision concrete steps unfolding assured justice leaving no regrets behind setting precedence inspiring citizens reclaim respect deservedly without doubt resorting faith prevailing state laws rather than succumbing defeat untimely unwarranted.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Forsyth Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Forsyth

Areas of Practice in Forsyth

Bike Crashes

Dedicated to legal advocacy for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Flame Damages

Extending skilled legal help for people of major burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Healthcare Negligence

Extending specialist legal representation for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Obligation

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, supplying professional legal guidance to customers affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Misconduct

Protecting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Fall and Stumble Injuries

Skilled in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking justice for their losses.

Newborn Harms

Supplying legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Incidents: Focused on aiding victims of car accidents obtain reasonable recompense for injuries and harm.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Focused on providing legal services for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Delivering experienced legal services for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for losses.

Worksite Crashes

Focused on representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or recklessness.

Neurological Impairments

Expert in extending compassionate legal assistance for clients suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Damages

Specialized in addressing cases for people who have suffered injuries from dog bites or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Crashes

Dedicated to legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Unjust Loss

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering caring and adept legal services to ensure fairness.

Neural Trauma

Committed to advocating for patients with spinal cord injuries, offering dedicated legal representation to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer