FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Fowler

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the aftermath of a dog bite injury, navigating through legal complexities can feel overwhelming. Where might you turn? Consider engaging with Carlson Bier; our esteemed Illinois law firm expertly handles dog bite injuries cases. In these harrowing incidents, we understand that local representation is crucial in delivering swift, efficient service to clients across various cities such as Fowler. Our reputation for pursuing justice relentlessly makes us an ideal ally as you seek to recover damages incurred from your personal injury case.

Carlson Bier’s seasoned professionals combine years of experience and extensive legal prowess regarding dog bite injuries litigation in Illinois. We are dedicated to ensuring our clients receive substantial compensation for their trauma – medical costs, loss of wages and mental anguish underscore these claims.

Choosing Carlson Bier means aligning yourself with hard-hitting advocates who prioritize your needs while maintaining strict compliance with Illinois state laws.

Let us transform this distressing episode into a pursuit for justice – Trust Carlson Bier with lawful resolution towards recovery amid hardship caused by dog bite injuries.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Fowler Illinois

At Carlson Bier, your well-being is our top priority. We serve as passionate legal advocates for victims of personal injury incidents across Illinois, specializing in various cases such as car accidents, wrongful death suits, and specifically – dog bite injuries. Deep-seated within the ethos of our law firm is an unwavering commitment to safeguarding the rights of individuals who have endured pain and suffering due to dog bite injuries.

In essence, a dog bite injury can occur unexpectedly and may lead to serious health consequences beyond physical harm. It culminates in profound psychological trauma that can linger indefinitely if not adequately addressed. Often overlooked are factors such as cost related to medical treatment, lost wages due to prolonged recovery periods or irreversible disability induced by severe attacks – all of which significantly contribute towards escalating distress levels amongst victims.

Coping with empowerment post-incident is a journey we ardently navigate alongside each client at Carlson Bier. As legal professionals focused on personal injury cases, especially those stemming from dog bites, there are three pieces of advice we invariably provide:

• Seek Immediate Medical Attention: The importance of timely medical intervention after a dog bite cannot be overstressed. This mitigates any future health complications while offering substantial evidence when seeking compensation later.

• Document Everything: Thorough record-keeping pertaining to medical reports and expenses incurred during treatment proves invaluable while pursuing claims.

• Contact Experienced Legal Assistance Immediately: Dog bite laws vary between jurisdictions; understanding nuances specific to Illinois jurisdiction necessitates consultation with local expert legal counsel.

Fortifying resilience through every client’s ordeal underpins the approach adopted by us at Carlson Bier. Every victim deserves justice and adequate compensation concordant with their traumatic experiences, concrete facts articulated clearly via evidence-based discussions supporting these claims.

For instance, Illinois operates under ‘strict liability’ doctrine governing dog bite injury lawsuits – suggesting that proof indicating negligence isn’t mandatory for holding the animal owner legally responsible for damages inflicted by their pet on others. Consequently, the court views ‘provocation’ as pivotal in deciding dog bite injury disputes. If it is established that the victim provoked the animal before being bitten, awarding compensation becomes highly unlikely.

Ingressing into further nuances of Illinois law – unearthing exact legal terms such as ‘injury,’ ‘owner’ and ‘without provocation,’ alongside explaining how these interconnect while shaping final verdicts – can be a challenging endeavor. That’s when having competent representation from experienced personal injury attorneys comes to your aid.

Comfortably ensconced at States like Illinois’ legal forefront dealing with dog bite injuries for years now implies our expertise at Carlson Bier isn’t simply limited to understanding laws better; rather extends towards harnessing this knowledge judiciously while representing aggrieved individuals, ensuring every client gets the justice they rightfully deserve. Efficient coordination between multiple stakeholders involved – law enforcement agencies, medical professionals, insurance providers, and judicial bodies – underscores our comprehensive service offering designed keeping in mind each individual case’s unique demands and constraints.

We will fight tooth and nail to ensure you receive just recompense for your sufferings – translating not merely into covering current medical expenses or compensating lost wages but factoring potentially impending future circumstances too; in-apprehensive of whether these are continuous post-treatment care costs or diminished earning capacity caused by sustained disabilities resulting from original dog bite incidents.

Expert tactical moves cumulatively constitute the larger strategic pursuit towards success inside courtrooms. We pride ourselves on our ability to weave together intricate elements encompassed within personal injury lawsuits pertaining especially to dog bites artfully: obtaining key evidence pieces; conducting incisive negotiations; presenting convincing arguments conducive to achieving positive outcomes consistently.

We sympathize with your harrowing experiences following unfortunate dog bite incidents, empathizing with ensuing sentiments of helplessness overwhelming victims gradually over time. Seek solace knowing that reliable assistance during these turbulent times is readily accessible through us at Carlson Bier – professionals dedicated to championing your cause relentlessly, empowering you throughout what essentially becomes a battle for justice.

Please click the button below to explore further how we can assist in evaluating your case correctly; providing an accurate estimate matching compensations rightfully deserved. Armed with reliable, professional assistance from experts well versed in Illinois-specific dog bite laws – here’s finally your chance to enjoy some much-needed peace of mind. Remember, securing justice isn’t just about seeking financial compensation but more importantly, attaining closure while reclaiming lost personal confidence levels post-incident. At Carlson Bier, we stand ready to enforce your rights and fight for the justice that you deserve!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Fowler Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Fowler

Areas of Practice in Fowler

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Specializing in legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or perilous conditions.

Scald Wounds

Extending skilled legal services for people of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or negligence.

Medical Malpractice

Ensuring professional legal support for patients affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Liability

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, delivering specialist legal assistance to clients affected by harmful products.

Aged Misconduct

Defending the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Fall and Slip Occurrences

Specialist in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking redress for their damages.

Neonatal Harms

Supplying legal assistance for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Collisions: Dedicated to aiding victims of car accidents secure appropriate payout for hurts and destruction.

Motorbike Collisions

Specializing in providing representation for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

Semi Crash

Providing expert legal representation for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for losses.

Building Site Incidents

Focused on assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Cerebral Harms

Focused on providing expert legal support for persons suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Wounds

Specialized in handling cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from dog bites or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Committed to legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Demise

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and expert legal assistance to ensure fairness.

Vertebral Harm

Committed to assisting persons with paralysis, offering specialized legal representation to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440