FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Fox Lake Hills

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

At Carlson Bier law firm, we specialize in representing clients dealing with dog bite injuries. As advocates entrenched deeply in Illinois legal terrain, we champion your rights and seek the compensation you deserve following a canine-inflicted injury. Residents of Fox Lake Hills stand to benefit from our sector-focused expertise where the complexities of dog-bite cases are undoubtedly familiar territory for us. Backed by a proficient team, each case is handled meticulously taking into account unique circumstances surrounding your trauma. This ensures maximum restitution to aid medical treatment costs and potential lost wages due to recovery periods or inflicted disability.

Trust in our excellent track record distinctively placed in navigating these often overwhelming legal proceedings thus lessening this burden during such difficult times.

Remain confident that engaging us enables strategic litigation processes influenced by years of experience and an intimate understanding of local laws concerning animal-related harms without failing victim’s rights compliance agenda.Be proactive; choose Carlson Bier as your priority consideration for representation when grappling with challenging outcomes brought about by unfortunate occurrences of dog bite injuries – because you deserve justice!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Fox Lake Hills Illinois

When you or a beloved member of your family suffer from a dog bite injury, understanding your rights and potential avenues for compensation can feel overwhelming. The law offices of Carlson Bier, reputable personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, bring their specialist knowledge to the fore: shedding light on complexities surrounding dog bite injuries and advocating fiercely for your rightful recompense.

Under Illinois law, you are entitled to seek damage if injured by another person’s animal without provoking it – so long as you were conducting yourself peaceably at the time of attack and weren’t infringing upon that individual’s property. It’s worth noting; however, that pitfalls exist when proving these factors in court. For this reason alone, engaging experienced legal professionals – such as our team here at Carlson Bier – is imperative.

Our deep expertise enables us to advise correctly on many crucial aspects relating to Dog Bite Injury cases:

– It’s not just bites! We know it might sound unusual but ‘Dog Bite’ laws cover more than biting incidents alone – including any harm inflicted by animals (scratches or otherwise).

– Proof Is Key! Establishing liability necessitates unambiguous proof that the defendant’s animal committed the purported act.

– Timeliness Counts! Filing a lawsuit within Illinois’ Statute of Limitations is crucial – this typically stands at two years post-injury.

– One-bite rule doesn’t apply in Illinois: Unlike some other states, liability lies with pet owners regardless of whether their pet had prior undesirable behavior histories.

With these insights in hand, unfurling strong suits becomes relatively less stressful. In driving favorable outcomes for each client we serve – and securing maximum settlements where possible – Carlson Bier meticulously reviews every aspect of your case: commencement through conclusion.

Drawing on our vast experience tackling hundreds of such claims successfully throughout our operational history further imprints confidence across clients from all walks of life – yielding reassurance even amidst challenging times faced post such distressing incidents. This tenacity, we surmise, stems from our commitment to safeguard the rights of innocent victims – ultimately helping them overcome their hurdles with heightened ease and needed courage.

Remember – every case is unique; your avenue for compensation may differ from someone else’s in numerous ways. Thus universalizing strategies often does more harm than good. At Carlson Bier, each client receives a bespoke legal strategy tailored to the specifics of their situation (and injury) – thereby boosting chances for substantially successful outcomes across cases received.

Moreover, while medical expenses generally assume predominance amongst claims filed, you could potentially pursue compensation for other damages as well: emotional trauma, loss of income through absence at work (post-incident), permanent disfigurement or disability etc. In offering comprehensive advice that traverses conventional domains yet enters nuances commonly overlooked by many consumers themselves unknowingly – Carlson Bier exemplifies how personal injury attorney support should naturally be structured today.

If you’re currently grappling with aftermaths stemming from a dog bite-related incident yourself – take heart in knowing appropriate means for remediation aren’t merely possible but indeed feasible under Illinois law provisions too! We warmly invite you now to learn more about what might your own path towards adequate retribution resemble practically: click on the button below to find out how much your case could feasibly be worth under prevailing norms – another endeavorable leap closer towards realizing justice deservedly yours effectively carried forth.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Fox Lake Hills Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Fox Lake Hills

Areas of Practice in Fox Lake Hills

Bike Collisions

Expert in legal support for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or risky conditions.

Flame Wounds

Offering expert legal services for patients of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or negligence.

Physician Misconduct

Extending dedicated legal services for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Commodities Fault

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, providing adept legal guidance to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Abuse

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Tumble and Fall Injuries

Adept in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking justice for their harm.

Newborn Harms

Offering legal support for kin affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Mishaps: Dedicated to aiding victims of car accidents get just recompense for injuries and destruction.

Bike Mishaps

Expert in providing legal support for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Trucking Crash

Providing experienced legal services for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for harms.

Worksite Incidents

Dedicated to representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Cognitive Impairments

Specializing in providing expert legal representation for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Harms

Specialized in dealing with cases for people who have suffered traumas from dog attacks or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Committed to legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unjust Loss

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and professional legal support to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Harm

Specializing in supporting persons with spinal cord injuries, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440