...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Fox Lake

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When experiencing a dog bite injury in Fox Lake, securing competent legal representation is crucial. Your leading choice: Carlson Bier, an Illinois-based personal injury law firm renowned for adeptness and integrity. Specified in handling complex cases involving dog bite injuries, we work tirelessly to secure maximum compensation for physical harm, mental distress and resulting damages. Through our scrupulous investigation methods, savvy negotiation skills and formidable litigation acumen; we seek to ensure justice served. We possess vast experience liaising with insurance companies ensuring claims treated justly or taking matters court-wise when necessary. Our skilled attorneys diligently unravel laws’ intricacies surrounding dog bites; from leash regulations to owners’ liability clauses within your neighborhood’s jurisdictional confines of Fox Lake premise without exclusion implications beyond the city line if required. Trusting your case with Carlson Bier not only incorporates exceptional service but also brings peace of mind that every legal avenue is explored toward achieving desired outcome – establishing why we are considered among the best choices for representing victims of dog bite injuries in Fox Lake.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Fox Lake Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, your dedicated personal injury attorneys based in Illinois. One of our specialized areas of practice centers on Dog Bite Injuries, a complex and often misunderstood area of the law, which can lead to significant physical, emotional, and financial stress for victims. Dog bites are unfortunately not uncommon events but knowing how to approach them legally can make all the difference.

The repercussions from dog bites aren’t just confined to immediate physical harm; they often go far beyond. Victims may experience profound psychological trauma that lasts long after the wounds have healed. The costs related with treating these injuries and mental health support can mount quickly. Consequently, it’s crucial to know your legal options should you ever find yourself or a loved one in such unfortunate circumstances.

Firstly, understanding liability is key in dog bite cases:

• If owners knew their dogs were dangerous yet did nothing about it – they’re typically liable.

• If owners unlawfully let their dogs run free leading to an attack – they’re generally held accountable.

• If someone was bitten while lawfully on private property i.e., not trespassing – you might have grounds for establishing owner liability.

In Illinois specifically,

• We operate under a “strict liability” system when it comes to animal attacks – meaning if a dog injures another person without provocation while out in public or legally on the owner’s property (not trespassing), then the owner is liable for damages resulting from that attack even if they didn’t know about any viciousness in their pet.

While each case depends heavily on its unique set of facts, having skilled attorneys like those at Carlson Bier assist you navigate through this intricate area could significantly improve outcomes for clients seeking justice.

Secondly, understanding compensation matters will ensure realistic expectations for potential settlements or jury awards:

• Immediate medical bills: Hospital stays, doctor consultations and medications factor into medically-related expenses.

• Future treatment costs: Physical therapy sessions needed following severe injuries, prescription medications for pain relief and potential corrective surgeries.

• Psychological trauma: Counseling or therapy sessions to manage stress, anxiety and other emotional issues resulting from the dog bite incident.

• Lost income: If you’ve had to take time off work due to physical or psychological consequences of the attack.

At Carlson Bier, we have a long-standing history of helping clients receive comprehensive settlements and verdicts in these cases. We bring extensive knowledge of dog bite laws coupled with fierce advocacy that seeks full compensation for our clients’ suffering.

Lastly, proving fault in dog bite cases usually centers on three key elements:

• The defendant indeed owned the dog

• The plaintiff did not provoke their own injuries by teasing or hurting the animal

• The plaintiff was lawfully present when bit

It’s also essential to note time limits (or ‘statute of limitations’) applying to personal injury lawsuits in Illinois. Generally, you have two years from the date of the injury event to file suit.

In an area of practice defined by complexities such as these, using experienced legal support like Carlson Bier can prove invaluable. Our attorneys cut through difficulties, ensuring optimal results by navigating bureaucracy so you don’t need to.

If you or a loved one is victimized by a dog bite injury, please remember – help is just a click away. Find out what your case might be worth promptly and at no obligation – click on the button below right now knowing our team is ready around-the-clock to provide robust representation catered to individual client needs advocating fearlessly for your rights and recovery. Don’t wait; start taking steps towards resolution today with Carlson Bier – where we commit ourselves wholly until justice prevailed every time!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Fox Lake Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Fox Lake

Areas of Practice in Fox Lake

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Proficient in legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or unsafe conditions.

Scald Damages

Offering skilled legal help for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Hospital Carelessness

Providing experienced legal advice for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Products Fault

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, extending skilled legal support to customers affected by faulty goods.

Senior Misconduct

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip and Fall Mishaps

Skilled in dealing with slip and fall accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking recovery for their suffering.

Birth Injuries

Providing legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Auto Accidents

Accidents: Focused on guiding individuals of car accidents gain just compensation for damages and damages.

Bike Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for individuals involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

Trucking Mishap

Extending adept legal assistance for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for damages.

Building Collisions

Focused on assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Brain Harms

Expert in providing compassionate legal representation for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Harms

Proficient in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or beast attacks.

Jogger Incidents

Expert in legal representation for joggers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Unfair Demise

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and skilled legal services to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Damage

Dedicated to advocating for clients with spinal cord injuries, offering dedicated legal support to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer