FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Fox Lake

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When involved in a pedestrian accident, securing fair compensation can be incredibly challenging. That’s when you need the unmatched legal expertise of Carlson Bier at your side. Specializing in personal injury law and long renowned for their experience with Pedestrian Accident cases across Illinois, they understand these intricate proceedings like no other firm does. They are deeply committed to helping victims navigate the complexities that follow such accidents while ensuring they receive full-deserved payment for their loss and suffering. Having served countless clients successfully from diverse metropolises, including Fox Lake, Carlson Bier enjoys tremendous goodwill among respective communities as trustworthy attorneys who deliver results every time.

Their insight into varied locales sharpens their ability to represent unique challenges each case represents depending on regional specifics – one more distinction making them an ideal lawyer choice irrespective of geographic boundaries within Illinois state lines. Through strategic action plans custom-tailored according to individual basis and prompt communication keeping clients firmly in loop throughout litigation process; that’s how Carlson Bier continues proving itself as premier choice for effective legal representation following any Pedestrian Accident.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Fox Lake Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our paramount priority is the safeguarding of your legal rights following a pedestrian accident. Our seasoned personal injury attorneys, proficient in Illinois law, harness their rich experience and deep-rooted understanding of local regulations to secure the best possible compensation for those affected by such accidents. Pedestrian accidents can result in severe injuries that might lead to substantial medical bills, loss of income, and even an altered lifestyle due to potentially debilitating conditions.

A confluence of risk factors often leads to pedestrian accidents: reckless driving, speeding vehicles, failure to yield at crosswalks or traffic lights, distracted driving – these are but some situations leading up to such unfortunate incidents. The repercussions for the victim can be severe; fractures, head or spinal cord injuries and internal organ damage may require extensive emergency treatment followed by prolonged rehabilitation.

It’s essential that accident victims understand their rights under Illinois law ensued from suffering a personal injury. Primarily:

• You have the right to file a lawsuit against all parties responsible for the accident,

• You could be eligible for monetary damages covering past and future medical costs directly related to your injury,

• Compensation can also cover lost wages if you’ve been unable detain employment post-accident,

The intricacies involved in effectively exercising these rights necessitate expertise only professional legal counsel like Carlson Bier’s attorneys can offer. We engage diligently on behalf of our clients navigating through negotiations with insurance firms or presenting compelling cases in courtrooms when required.

One critical aspect pedestrian accident victims should comprehend is comparative negligence—this doctrine acknowledges both parties’ responsibilities during an accident event. Under Illinois state law, even if you partially contributed towards causing an unwarranted incident which resulted in your injury (for example—jaywalking), you’re still entitled as per the proportionate liability enactment. That means if other party remains predominantly at-fault (>50%), they are liable for compensating proportional share for your resultant costs and damages.

Connecting with an accomplished personal injury attorney at the earliest following a pedestrian accident is advisable. Swift vetting of facts, crucial evidence preservation and also immediate initiation of necessary procedures will likely enhance the prospects for receiving maximum entitled compensation. Allowing us to shoulder your legal battles helps you dedicate complete focus towards recovery.

As stalwarts in Illinois legal circles, Carlson Bier ascertains your rights aren’t marginalized when dealing with insurance companies— entities often endeavoring to undermine claims or settle for minimum payouts. By incorporating comprehensive investigative strategies, decisive negotiation techniques, and formidable legal arguments, we strive relentlessly to substantiate every claim robustly ensuring rightful justice served.

Correspondingly, remember that time influences your pursuit of a justified compensation strongly; Illinois stipulates strict deadlines called statutes of limitations within which you must file a lawsuit post-incident else risk forfeiting your chance for reparation permanently—another significant reason warranting prompt legal attention thus making Carlson Bier an essential ally in protecting one’s civil rights.

In summary, if you or any loved ones have unfortunately been victims of such disconcerting incidents, our highly competent team at Carlson Bier awaits eagerly with tailored proficient assistance targeted at gaining apt retribution against responsible parties. Acknowledging pedestrian accidents can cripple physically and financially—we negate these overwhelming burdens through determined passion and unwavering commitment underpinned by years of astute professional acumen advocating on behalf of those unexpectedly enveloped within the tragic fold’s biting grasp.

We cordially invite you now to take that all-important first vital step – click the button below to evaluate the potential worth settling rightfully yours through expert representation eliciting suitable monetary recognition commensurate with genuine incurred damages borne unwillingly due to another’s negligence or disregard on Illinois’ streets.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Fox Lake Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Fox Lake

Areas of Practice in Fox Lake

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Dedicated to legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or unsafe conditions.

Burn Damages

Offering professional legal help for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Hospital Carelessness

Offering professional legal advice for patients affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Liability

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, offering expert legal guidance to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Abuse

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip & Tumble Mishaps

Adept in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to persons seeking recovery for their suffering.

Birth Damages

Supplying legal help for loved ones affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Mishaps: Dedicated to aiding individuals of car accidents gain equitable settlement for wounds and impairment.

Bike Crashes

Focused on providing legal advice for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for harm.

Big Rig Mishap

Offering specialist legal advice for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for hurts.

Construction Accidents

Concentrated on defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Head Injuries

Expert in extending specialized legal advice for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Damages

Adept at managing cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Focused on legal representation for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering compensation.

Unjust Fatality

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and experienced legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Spine Impairment

Expert in advocating for victims with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal support to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​