Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Frankfort

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you need a dog bite injury lawyer, Carlson Bier is an excellent choice. We understand the traumatic effects of dog bites and are committed to handling all aspects of your case while you focus on healing. With years of experience successfully litigating personal injury claims throughout Illinois, including in Frankfort, our firm provides expert assistance every step of the way- from filing for damages to negotiating settlements or progressing to trial if necessary. Our seasoned attorneys meticulously investigate each claim’s unique circumstances and leverage their extensive legal knowledge for your benefit. You can trust us to aggressively pursue full compensation for expenses associated with injuries sustained due to a canine attack such as medical costs, lost earnings etcetera within the purview of applicable law.Our unwavering commitment is towards ensuring clients receive justice they deserve making us one-of-a-kind when it comes down procuring finest results possible after experiencing traumatizing dog-bite occurrence.Consequently,in matters necessitating competent representation regarding Dog Bite Injuries,Carslon Bier stands tall above rest.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Frankfort Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the physical and emotional toll a dog bite injury can impose on an individual or their loved ones. Moreover, becoming familiar with the intricacies of Illinois law and procedures surrounding such incidents may seem daunting to anyone without any legal background. Our experienced personal injury attorneys specialize in guiding you step-by-step through this complex process, promising all-inclusive support.

Every year more than 4 million Americans are bitten by dogs, leading to varying degrees of injuries; from minor scrapes or deep lacerations to psychological trauma – even fatalities in extreme cases. Due to these alarming statistics, it is crucial for residents of our state to know where they stand legally if they find themselves or their family members caught up in such unfortunate circumstances.

The first thing one should understand about Dog Bite Law in Illinois is that the owner is held liable “strictly” i.e., regardless of whether the canine had demonstrated violent tendencies beforehand or not. Under the Illinois Animal Control Act, victims can sue not only for medical expenses but also for any physical anguish and mental suffering endured.

A unique element within this sector of personal injury law is that there isn’t simply one type of dog bite case.There are different kinds:

• Unprovoked Attacks –When a victim gets bitten without any provoking action towards it.

• Provoked Attacks– Instances where someone’s direct actions lead towards getting bitten.

• Cases involving minors –Special considerations come into play here where children under seven years old are involved.

• Postal worker attacks– Working around pets increases risk exponentially for postal workers which are significant enough constitutionally be considered as its own category according state rules.

Due diligence falls largely upon dog owners ensuring safety public spaces additionally maintaining control over his/her pet at all times. This includes making sure pets are leashed when outside home premises reasonable care taken potential aggressors aren’t provoked unnecessarily.

However, understanding your rights after getting bitten doesn’t minimize pain or suffering endured. This is where Carlson Bier steps in, with a dedicated team of personal injury lawyers, we ensure you have the legal support required to receive just compensation for such adversities. Our firm prides itself on tailor-made strategies aligned precisely with each client’s unique scenario and objectives.

At Carlson Bier, our attorneys are heartily committed in their pursuit of your rights and wellbeing after such an incident. We see it as much more than merely fighting against negligent persons – but assuring Illinois residents have a safe environment to live in and contribute towards that effort by holding culprits accountable.

Don’t allow another person’s negligence to burden your life any further. You deserve understanding, rightful restitution for losses incurred, and ultimately – justice. That is exactly what we endeavor to deliver at our law firm independently assisting victims conquer this worn-down phase victoriously.

Curious about the value of your case? With claims varying depending on degree injury, loss income etc., obtaining an exact number might seem puzzling without professional insight – which we’re more than ready provide!

We encourage you now to take advantageof our “case evaluation” tool right below for accurate assessment your circumstances one from expertly trained team members at Carlson Bier be reach shortly after submission discuss possibilities moving forward together ensuring maximum possible compensation advised upon state law.

Take control today; secure measurement worth hardships faced No need fight battle alone willing alongside every step way! Let us guide successfully through these tolling times so locate peace mind rightfully deserves Click button below find out how much dog bite injury case is worth.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Frankfort Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Frankfort

Areas of Practice in Frankfort

Cycling Mishaps

Specializing in legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or risky conditions.

Fire Traumas

Supplying professional legal help for victims of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Medical Malpractice

Offering specialist legal representation for persons affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Responsibility

Taking on cases involving problematic products, extending expert legal assistance to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Elder Malpractice

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to misconduct in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble & Slip Incidents

Skilled in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking recovery for their harm.

Birth Harms

Delivering legal guidance for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Mishaps

Incidents: Devoted to aiding patients of car accidents gain fair remuneration for harms and losses.

Bike Collisions

Committed to providing representation for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

Big Rig Incident

Extending adept legal assistance for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for losses.

Construction Crashes

Concentrated on defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Neurological Harms

Committed to delivering professional legal support for persons suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Wounds

Skilled in addressing cases for clients who have suffered damages from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Expert in legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Demise

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing empathetic and adept legal support to ensure fairness.

Spinal Cord Damage

Expert in supporting persons with spine impairments, offering specialized legal support to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer