FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Bicycle Accidents in Franklin Park

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the traumatic experience of a bicycle accident in Franklin Park, every victim deserves fair advocacy. At Carlson Bier, we are dedicated to providing our clients with top-tier legal services specifically tailored to bicycle accidents. Being experienced personal injury attorneys in Illinois underpins our unwavering commitment to leverage robust litigation strategies and achieve favorable results for victims of these unfortunate incidents. Passionate about justice, we guide you through each step ensuring your rights are fiercely defended as you seek compensation for medical costs and lost wages among other damages. Our track record proves formidable; evidenced by numerous satisfied clients who have found resolution under our attentive legal counsel throughout their recovery journey after a bicycle accident. With Carlson Bier on your side – empathy meets proficiency anchored by utmost dedication – combined lies the key strength that distinguishes us as an attorney group worthy of choosing through this difficult time.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Franklin Park Illinois

Based in Illinois, the stately law firm of Carlson Bier is renowned for its expertise in personal injury legal cases. With a focus on providing an exceptional standard of counsel and representation for victims of accidents statewide, we hold a particular affinity for bicycle accident-related inquiries. Unfortunately, bike accidents have seen an increasing trend in recent years. Many individuals immediately realize how vulnerable they are as cyclists when they find themselves involved in such incidents.

Bicycle accidents often result in severe injuries due to the delicate balance between rider and vehicle and the apparent lack of protection offered to cyclists. In fact, it has been noted that even a minor collision could lead to significant bodily harm or result in long-lasting physical trauma, possibly impacting the victim’s life quality.

To alleviate these repercussions, our experienced attorneys at Carlson Bier approach each case with diligence and desire for justice. We firmly believe that education leads empowerment – hence we aim to furnish you with relevant insights about bicycle accidents:

– Predominantly related to road safety issues: The primary cause behind many bike accidents is either negligent motorist behaviour or unsafe road conditions.

– Several laws protect bicyclist rights: Various state laws ensure that cyclists can claim compensation if injured due to someone else’s negligence.

– Emotional distress can be claimed: Not only physical injuries but emotional distress caused by such an accident could be grounds for claiming compensation.

Injuries sustained from these unfortunate incidences can range widely – bruises, cuts and scrapes; broken bones; head injuries including concussions or traumatic brain injury; neck and spinal cord damage leading to potential disability or paralysis; internal damages like organ rupture or bleeding.

This wide array let us understand one basic premise – no two bicycle accident cases are the same. Each has unique circumstances which require individual attention so as not to limit your rightful compensation based solely on reported averages of similar cases publicized previously.

The jurisdictional aspect plays quite a role too – certain freedom granted under Illinois law permits you not only the right to cycle, but it also justly allows compensation should your bicycle journey be abruptly halted by another’s disregard.

Being unrepresented in such cases or opting for a general attorney might prove disadvantageous. With Carlson Bier at your helm, our firm uniquely presents access to immediate resources combined with tailored strategies designed after extensive assessment of each case. This approach aids us in expediting processes and achieving favorable results more efficiently – whether through settlements negotiations or jury verdicts.

At Carlson Bier, we passionately advocate within the confines of Illinois state law towards winning rightful compensations for victims of bike accidents. It must be recognized that personal injuries inflict costs beyond medical bills – there are also lost incomes, therapy expenses, and even loss of life enjoyment due to permanent scarring or disabilities.

Your peace-of-mind matters! People often refrain from seeking justice because they fear mounting legal fees— this needn’t worry cripple your pursuit for compensation one iota. Our policy stands firmly on “no win, no fee” principle – fair representation without financial pressure as remuneration is demanded only if the rightful compensation is secured for you!

As part of our mission statement at Carlson Bier, we believe knowledge is power; we have amassed comprehensive information surrounding bike accident claims which isn’t merely relevant to any cyclist but holds considerable depth unmatched elsewhere. Besides advocating stridently for you legally within Illinois’ bounds during these unfortunate happenings on two wheels; equipping every visitor with accurate data remains paramount.

Dedicated legal assistance like ours helps build sturdy cases in these complex yet vital situations where safeguarding yourself legally and financially becomes an utmost necessity rather than distant optionality. Click on the button below now and initiate an evaluation process exclusively crafted just for you by our master-class attorneys at Carlson Bier — letting you know how much your unique claim could potentially worth under Illinois law. Remember, every click leads to an opportunity – don’t let it pass by.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Franklin Park Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Franklin Park

Areas of Practice in Franklin Park

Cycling Collisions

Proficient in legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or hazardous conditions.

Burn Damages

Extending expert legal services for victims of serious burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Healthcare Negligence

Extending experienced legal assistance for victims affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Items Fault

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, delivering adept legal help to victims affected by harmful products.

Nursing Home Mistreatment

Advocating for the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble and Fall Incidents

Adept in managing trip accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking redress for their harm.

Neonatal Damages

Supplying legal support for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Mishaps

Crashes: Dedicated to guiding individuals of car accidents receive equitable recompense for hurts and damages.

Bike Mishaps

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

Trucking Accident

Offering experienced legal representation for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for hurts.

Construction Site Mishaps

Engaged in representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Cerebral Harms

Committed to offering professional legal advice for individuals suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Traumas

Expertise in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered traumas from dog bites or beast attacks.

Jogger Incidents

Focused on legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering recovery.

Unwarranted Loss

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and expert legal services to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Injury

Committed to representing victims with spinal cord injuries, offering expert legal services to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440