FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Franklin Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one is grappling with the unexpected anguish of a dog bite injury in Franklin Park, Carlson Bier’s expertise on the matter can assist you. We have an unrivaled prowess regarding Illinois personal injury law, earned after years sharpening legal acumen through numerous dog bite cases we’ve successfully handled. Over time, we’ve cultivated tenacious advocacy and strategic negotiation skills to ensure rightful compensation for victims facing physical trauma and emotional distress from such incidents. Collaborating with our firm paves your path towards achieving justice by holding negligent pet owners accountable under Illinois’ rigorous stringent laws regardings animal attacks. Moreover, Carlson Bier takes pride in tailoring services according to each client’s individual needs while ensuring their rights are protected during complicates undertakings like negotiations or trials – thus demonstrating why choosing us could be just what your case requires: proven proficiency matched by compassionate representation.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Franklin Park Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the lasting effects a dog bite can have on our clients. As Illinois’s premier personal injury attorneys, we specialize in serving survivors of dog bite injuries. We prioritize our clients’ rights and walk them through every step of their legal journey with compassion and dedication. It is vital for victims to know your rights when dealing with dog bite injuries.

Fundamentally, you must realize that as a victim of a dog attack in Illinois, more than physical harms might be at stake. The emotional trauma following such an incident could also result in psychological issues like anxiety or post-traumatic stress syndrome (PTSD). Depending upon severity, it can manifest as allergic reactions, infections such as rabies and tetanus along with potential nerve damage.

Part of bringing value to our clients is educating them about key aspects relevant to their case:

• Strict Liability – Under Illinois law, the owner of any animal that injures someone is liable for damages without needing to prove negligence.

• Deadline To File A Lawsuit – You generally have two years from the time of injury to file suit against the pet owner.

• Insurance Coverage – Many homeowner’s insurance policies cover liability arising from dog bites.

An essential part of dealing with such unfortunate events involves seeking immediate medical attention. This helps not only in terms of rapid recovery but serves as viable evidence should you wish to pursue a claim. Additionally, reporting these incidents promptly ensures accurate documentation which bolsters your case substantially during litigation.

Our experienced team works diligently ensuring all bases are exhaustively covered from gathering necessary documents and information relating directly to your incident – including medical records showing extent and nature of the injury sustained plus any evidences such as photographs taken immediately after mishap along with obtaining statements from eyewitnesses too if any.

Navigating through jury trials or settlement negotiations demands seasoned professionals who truly care about securing fair compensation for our respected clientele at Carlson Bier. Trust us when we assert that you aren’t just another case to us. We are committed to helping each and every client find justice, regain their composure, and reclaim their lives after sustaining dog bite injuries.

The process may look daunting from the outset. Yet with a competent team like us at your disposal, we strive to manage all legal aspects diligently while you focus energies on regaining health back. What’s better than having an assurance of licensed, skilled lawyers deal your case passionately as if it were their personal issue?

Never compromise on all what you deserve in wake of these incidents – be it compensation for medical bills incurred; wages lost due to inability concerning work during recovery period; cost towards rehabilitation therapies or even general damages like pain plus suffering endured irrelevant of any financial losses sustained.

Knowing well how critical results matter when someone endures this unfortunate experience, we always advise consulting a proficient, dedicated and compassionate law firm like Carlson Bier who can guide not against just immediate implications but those potentially long-term ones too covering every potential avenue relevant under Illinois Law specifically.

Now is the time for action. You’ve gained understanding of intricacies involved within dog bite injuries respective legal claims aiding decisiveness securing your future financial stability for blissful recuperation absolutely uncompromised following such traumatic events forced upon without choice. To initiate discussions with our esteemed attorneys specialized in this arena across Illinois – click the button below now! We offer expert evaluation estimating real value behind your claim ensuring protection availing everything rightfully owed post horrifying experiences.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Franklin Park Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Franklin Park

Areas of Practice in Franklin Park

Cycling Accidents

Specializing in legal services for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Fire Damages

Providing skilled legal assistance for victims of intense burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Healthcare Malpractice

Ensuring professional legal support for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Items Responsibility

Addressing cases involving defective products, supplying professional legal help to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Malpractice

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble and Tumble Accidents

Adept in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking restitution for their injuries.

Newborn Damages

Extending legal help for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Crashes

Mishaps: Dedicated to supporting sufferers of car accidents secure fair remuneration for wounds and harm.

Scooter Crashes

Focused on providing legal advice for bikers involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

Trucking Accident

Extending professional legal assistance for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just claims for hurts.

Building Site Collisions

Concentrated on defending employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Cerebral Impairments

Expert in providing specialized legal services for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Wounds

Skilled in managing cases for people who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Jogger Crashes

Expert in legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Unfair Loss

Advocating for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and professional legal support to ensure justice.

Vertebral Damage

Focused on advocating for clients with paralysis, offering professional legal representation to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440