FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Franklin Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

Involvement in an incident that has resulted in a spinal cord injury is a devastating experience. When facing such significant health and lifestyle changes, you need supportive legal guidance to navigate the complex landscape of personal injury law. At Carlson Bier, we specialize in providing personalized representation for individuals dealing with spinal cord injuries. Our expert attorneys can help fight for much-needed compensation after experiencing such life-altering harm.

With extensive knowledge of Franklin Park’s local nuances and regulations applied to these case types, our team brings unparalleled insight into navigating your unique situation effectively – whether working towards an amicable settlement or fighting moderately through trial processes if necessary.

Our unwavering commitment to safeguarding your rights at each procedural stage combined with profound expertise sets us apart as effective advocates for Spinal Cord Injury clients. We take pride in assisting every client regain control over their life post-injury by securing financial restitution suitable both for immediate needs and long-term adjustments.

For unyielding representation grounded on compassion, skillful negotiation, and strategic litigation tactics regarding Spinal Cord Injuries – trust none other than Carlson Bier. Let’s work together towards achieving the justice you deserve.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Franklin Park Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the life-changing implications that Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI) can have on an individual and their loved ones. Representing a range of severity, from minor nerve damage to paralysis, these types of injuries require specialized knowledge for effective legal representation.

Spinal cord injuries typically fall into two categories: complete and incomplete. A complete SCI often implies a total loss of function below the level of injury, compromising not only mobility but daily life activities as well. On the other hand, with an incomplete spinal injury victims retain some function beneath the affected area although functionality might differ significantly from person-to-person.

The aftermath of such incidents can pose numerous challenges including medical expenses, rehabilitative services, pain management therapies among others. Moreover, victims frequently experience reduced quality of life due to modified personal roles and possible occupational setbacks or changes.

At Carlson Bier:

• We take time in understanding your unique circumstances.

• Provide expert advice on potential compensation based on Illinois Law

• Guide you through each phase of the legal process with clarity and understanding

Our expertise goes beyond just knowing the law; our decades-long practice enables us to integrate medical information effectively with legal insights offering a holistic approach towards your case resolution.

Our commitment is to ensure that justice is served by securing fair compensation for altered lives post-SCI occurrence. Here’s what you can expect when working with us:

• Thorough Investigation: Our team will work tirelessly digging deep into every aspect surrounding your accident.

• Expertise Support: We collaborate with renowned experts in medicine and related fields to build solid cases.

• Legal Strategy: Drawing from our extensive experiences handling SCI claims equips us strategically for success.

• Open Communication: Scheduled updates provide transparency about developments in your case.

We stand beside you in demanding accountability from those responsible while advocating fiercely for your full entitled compensations which may include but are not limited to medical costs (both past and future), lost wages, pain and suffering, emotional distress, rehabilitation services or adaptive technologies needed for daily life.

As you contemplate on next steps after an SCI incident, remember that legal time frames known as statute of limitations exist. We urge you not to delay in seeking legal counsel as any unnecessary delay may forfeit your right to financial compensation.

By choosing Carlson Bier as your personal injury law group in Illinois state jurisdiction – trusted allies with comprehensive knowledge on Spinal Cord Injuries — rest assured that you’re placing your case in the hands of experienced professionals committed to navigating this complex territory with utmost dedication. As fierce advocates for justice, we’ll walk with you every step during these challenging times ensuring minimum stress while pursuing maximum compensation.

When dealing with the aftermath of a spinal cord injury; uncertainty doesn’t have to define your path forward. The value of a legal claim depends greatly on factual details surrounding each case hence no general valuation metric applies across board. However, Carlson Bier’s tailored approach provides us capacity to give individual attention each case deserves determining its unique worth under Illinois Law.

In conclusion; let’s make sure nothing stands between you and potential deserved justice & compensation following a Spinal Cord Injury incident! Ready to take the next crucial step? Click below and find out just how much your precise case might be worth under the expertise of our seasoned attorneys at Carlson Bier — because here at our firm; You Matter! It’s about leveling scales underscoring fundamental principle that all individuals deserve justice irrespective of their circumstances preceding devastating living-altering events such as an SCI occurrence.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Franklin Park Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Franklin Park

Areas of Practice in Franklin Park

Bicycle Crashes

Expert in legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Scald Traumas

Giving adept legal advice for individuals of intense burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Medical Carelessness

Delivering professional legal services for individuals affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Commodities Obligation

Addressing cases involving defective products, extending skilled legal services to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Tumble & Trip Injuries

Expert in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal representation to victims seeking restitution for their suffering.

Neonatal Injuries

Delivering legal aid for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Incidents

Incidents: Committed to guiding clients of car accidents gain appropriate payout for damages and damages.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Committed to providing legal services for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

Semi Incident

Ensuring professional legal services for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for losses.

Construction Accidents

Engaged in representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Brain Harms

Committed to extending professional legal assistance for persons suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Injuries

Proficient in addressing cases for individuals who have suffered damages from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Crashes

Committed to legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Unjust Loss

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and adept legal assistance to ensure redress.

Spine Injury

Specializing in defending clients with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440