...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Bicycle Accidents in Franklin

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve suffered an accident while on two wheels in Franklin, the reputable legal team of Carlson Bier is your best ally to navigate through the intricacies of Illinois bicycle law. Our attorneys are renowned statewide for their impeccable track record and comprehensive understanding of bicycle-related cases. At Carlson Bier, we don’t just talk about justice; we deliver it with empathy, diligence and panache. We can assist if you have been hit by a car, collided with another biker or tripped over a pothole – these incidents may seem negligible but have grave effects on your well-being both physically and emotionally. Expedite your recovery process without worries as our versed lawyers fight fiercely for your lawful compensation against insurance companies that often undervalue claims unjustly. For us at Carlson Bier, every cyclist’s plight matters profoundly hence why partnering with us marks the beginning of swift recompense justice served rightfully—the aggressive advocacy dedicated solely to resolving Bicycle Accidents across Illinois pledges just that!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Franklin Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a dedicated group of expert personal injury attorneys specializing in myriad cases out of Illinois. Among the various personal injury claims we handle, bicycle accidents stand out as a particular area of our expertise. Accidents involving bicycles can be devastating due to the cyclist’s vulnerability compared to other road users. These accidents often result in serious injuries that could significantly affect your life physically, emotionally, and financially.

Understanding these challenges, our committed team prioritizes delivering high-quality legal services tailored to obtaining justice and rightful compensation for victims of bike accidents. We firmly believe that by emphasizing education about bicycle accident laws and their implications, we equip you with the necessary knowledge that could have a significant impact on your claim outcomes.

So let’s delve into the specifics:

– The Rights of Cyclists: Bikers have equivalent rights and responsibilities as drivers under Illinois law. If another party violates these rights leading to an accident, they may be held liable.

– Common Causes: Bicycle accidents are commonly caused by factors like distracted driving or cycling, failure to yield right-of-way, road hazards or traffic violations such as speeding or drunk driving.

– Liability Determination: In Illinois, even if you’re partially at fault in the biking accident (less than 50%), you could still recover damages proportionate to the defendant’s degree of fault.

– Damages Recoverable: Victims can potentially recover medical expenses including present and future needs related thereto owing to any disability sustained in such an incident; lost wages; pain & suffering; loss of enjoyment in life; disfigurement; among several others.

Every bike accident case is unique with its complexities. Our professional attorneys aim at extending personalized attention considering all these components peculiar to each situation. With keen insight into local laws coupled with vast experience in dealing effectively with insurance companies for maximum compensation recovery, trust us when we say – Your case is always well worth our fight!

The intricacies involved post-bicycle accident can be overwhelming and immensely stressful for victims & their families. Establishing legal liability can be convoluted, requiring expert knowledge of various aspects such as local bike laws, traffic regulations, and insurance policy limitations all underlined by walking an intricate pathway to proof.

That’s where our firm plays a pivotal role – offering guidance and acting as your relentless advocate amidst these challenges. We help collate comprehensive evidence including witness accounts or surveillance footage; contacting experts in bicycle accident reconstruction when needed; effectively dealing with medical providers & insurance adjusters on your behalf to set in motion swift and worthy claim proceedings while you focus solely on healing physically & mentally from the tragedy faced.

It is also crucial to act promptly following any bicycle accident irrespective of the perceived severity because Illinois law allows only a limited period within which personal injury claims should be filed post-incident.

Thus, we strongly encourage victims or family members who are struggling after a bicycle accident caused due to somebody else’s negligence, not to wait longer in seeking legal advice whether it’s understanding your rights, knowing what steps need taking next or discussing the potential worth of your case.

We hope that through this educational content about Bicycle Accidents, we have provided some valuable insights that may assist you maneuver through these challenging times. However, keep in mind — no amount of reading beats one-on-one consultation with our experienced attorney who can offer personalized solutions rooted in close analysis of your unique situation.

Remember: Legal battles over compensation claim post-bicycle accidents shouldn’t prevent you from focusing on recovery!

Instead – Come take advantage of our free initial consultation today! Click on the button below so let’s find out together how much YOUR CASE is worth! Trust us at Carlson Bier – because WE FIGHT FOR YOU!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Franklin Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Franklin

Areas of Practice in Franklin

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Expert in legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or hazardous conditions.

Fire Damages

Providing specialist legal help for people of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or negligence.

Hospital Misconduct

Extending expert legal advice for victims affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, supplying expert legal support to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Aged Malpractice

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring fairness.

Tumble and Tumble Incidents

Specialist in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to victims seeking recovery for their harm.

Newborn Harms

Providing legal help for families affected by medical incompetence resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Accidents

Collisions: Dedicated to guiding victims of car accidents get reasonable payout for harms and damages.

Scooter Mishaps

Expert in providing legal support for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Semi Accident

Ensuring specialist legal services for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for harms.

Worksite Accidents

Engaged in assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Cerebral Impairments

Dedicated to extending dedicated legal support for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Traumas

Specialized in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered traumas from dog bites or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Focused on legal support for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Demise

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and adept legal support to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Injury

Dedicated to defending clients with paralysis, offering expert legal guidance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​