FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Freeburg

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you or a loved one has experienced the unfortunate event of a pedestrian accident, it is critical to have an ally in your corner. Carlson Bier can be that for you. Rooted in skillful experience pertinent to these incidents, we stand at the frontline of representation for victims within Freeburg and beyond. As distinguished personal injury lawyers specializing in pedestrian accidents, our primary goal is securing justice while maximizing compensation on behalf of our clients.

We understand each situation is unique, hence approach cases diligently with a strategy tailored to suit individual needs and complexities involved. Our vast understanding of Illinois laws regarding pedestrian accidents enables us to apply effective measures that yield favorable results for those affected.

Carlson Bier’s unwavering commitment reflects not only through successful case outcomes but also by providing continuous support during challenging times faced by our clients following such events.

Choosing Carlson Bier assures dedicated legal guidance infused with empathy – combating tirelessly against negligent parties causing harm or injustice while navigating the intricate systems surrounding law proceedings adeptly. Trust us as your reliable partner for seeking rightful restitution after enduring a demanding Pedestrian Accident ordeal; together let’s restore order out from chaos.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Freeburg Illinois

Carlson Bier, renowned across Illinois for an unwavering dedication to personal injury law, is proud to serve those in need of legal advice and justice following pedestrian accidents. Accidents where an unfortunate individual has been struck by a vehicle often lead to severe injuries or, in tragic cases, fatality. According to reports published by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), more than 6,000 pedestrians are killed each year due to traffic crashes.

Pedestrian accidents can result from various causes such as distracted driving, drunk driving, speeding vehicles, poor lighting conditions, or disregarding crosswalk rules. At Carlson Bier we understand the importance of thoroughly investigating these incidents so that you receive comprehensive legal representation tailored to your unique circumstances.

One crucial aspect of such cases involves determining liability – who was legally at fault? The driver may seem like the obvious responsible party at first glance but there is a multitude of factors that come into play. Assigning liability might entail meticulously sifting through evidence like surveillance footage and witness testimonies; it could involve assessing whether the driver was reckless or if perhaps local authorities failed their duty with respect to road safety measures.

Additionally:

– Understand that while pedestrian errors cause some accidents – every case deserves a fair investigation.

– Irrespective of how clear-cut your accident may appear – remember everyone deserves unbiased representation.

– Ascertaining blame takes expertise – trust only specialized attorneys.

At Carlson Bier we have expert lawyers trained and committed entirely towards handling pedestrian accident cases because we understand they are unlike other vehicular accidents. Pedestrians share roads with powerful machines without any protection thus when an accident occurs it tends to disproportionately harm them endangering lives and affecting families emotionally and financially.

The team at Carlson Bier excels in comprehending these full implications which helps us guide our clients through their challenging times effectively:

We drive relentlessly seeking justice for our clients – Your victory implies ours.

We work with empathy providing complete emotional support – We feel your pain and hence, fight for you.

We offer assistance at every step – from filing a lawsuit to negotiating settlements and organizing paperwork. Our clients are our priority.

We acknowledge that no one seeks out to become the victim of an accident. Yet, if they do occur, we strongly advocate seeking legal help promptly because it can make an enormous difference in acquiring rightful compensation necessary for recovery.

Is the above information overwhelming? Perhaps it seems rather confusing? Or worse still- intimidating? Don’t be discouraged instead take heart knowing that just as specialized doctors exist so too do specialized attorneys who like us have devoted their professional lives towards gaining expertise in pedestrian accidents specifically so that individuals like you receive support you not only need but rightfully deserve.

Remember the law makes provisions for victims affected by others’ faults to receive compensation covering various aspects such as medical bills past and future income loss plus pinning accountability on responsible entities or persons.

As daunting as all this might sound right now taking your first steps towards securing justice can be simplified when guided effectively. Click on the button below to discover what compensation could be appropriate for someone having endured similar circumstances. Let the experts unravel complex legal terminology while allaying fears potentially transforming seemingly insurmountable problems into manageable challenges; reach out today! The right action taken timely ensures justice served appropriately safeguarding both current future interests.”

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Freeburg Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Freeburg

Areas of Practice in Freeburg

Cycling Crashes

Specializing in legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' negligence or risky conditions.

Thermal Traumas

Giving expert legal assistance for patients of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Hospital Incompetence

Offering experienced legal assistance for clients affected by physician malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Accountability

Handling cases involving defective products, extending adept legal support to clients affected by harmful products.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Defending the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble and Stumble Injuries

Skilled in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking compensation for their losses.

Childbirth Harms

Providing legal aid for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Crashes: Concentrated on aiding victims of car accidents get equitable settlement for harms and destruction.

Bike Accidents

Specializing in providing legal support for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

Truck Crash

Extending specialist legal support for persons involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recovery for losses.

Construction Site Mishaps

Committed to supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Head Injuries

Committed to delivering professional legal representation for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Harms

Proficient in managing cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Incidents

Dedicated to legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering damages.

Unjust Demise

Striving for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and experienced legal services to ensure compensation.

Neural Trauma

Committed to supporting individuals with paralysis, offering expert legal guidance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​