FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Freeburg

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Navigating through the intricate landscape of Spinal Cord Injury claims requires unrivaled professionalism, experience, and understanding. Your obvious choice should be Carlson Bier who champion your cause with unparalleled dedication in Illinois. We have earned a noteworthy reputation for being doggedly persistent while representing clients suffering from spinal injuries caused due to neglect or accidents. The required legal expertise to maneuver this complex labyrinth can significantly affect your compensation outcome. Trust in us means you capitalize on our extensive knowledge, wealth of experience, and high success rate in securing substantial settlements for an array of spinal cord injury victims. Our comprehensive approach ensures meticulous investigation supporting strong claim foundations followed by aggressive representation when necessary; we fight relentlessly until justice is served. With us handling your case, you will feel confident knowing that every possible angle has been diligently explored to ensure maximum recompense compatible with such debilitating conditions affecting quality of life so severely without compromising lucrative recovery possibilities one iota more than absolutely necessary. Opting for Carlson Bier marks embarking on your journey towards remedial resolution alongside a proven industry leader maintaining relentless pursuit until achieving successful settlement results comprehensively rewarding your trust steadfastly vested in our ability.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Freeburg Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we comprehend the gravity and life-altering consequences of spinal cord injuries. A leading personal injury law firm based in Illinois, we are unwaveringly committed to providing comprehensive legal assistance for those afflicted. Our taut network of knowledgeable personal injury lawyers is fiercely dedicated to your rights and passionate about securing equitable recompense.

Spinal cord injuries can result from a variety of incidents such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries or traumatic events. Alongside trailing physical discomfort and possible mobility impairment, they also encompass a magnitude of accessibility challenges and prohibitive medical expenses. Further still, countenancing the psychological distress associated with such devastating injuries requires fortitude that needs to be acknowledged legally and monetarily.

Key points about spinal cord injuries include:

– These come under catastrophic personal injury claims due to their profound effect on quality of life.

– They can lead to paraplegia or quadriplegia, demanding amplified healthcare needs.

– Financial implications could span ongoing rehabilitation costs along with loss wages due to inability to resume work.

Being wrapped up in convoluted legal protocols while already grappling with an enormous stressor like a spinal cord injury can seem overwhelming. That’s where our experienced attorneys step into the fray. At Carlson Bier, we anchor you through this disquieting storm by enforcing rightful compensation owed towards medical bills, lost earnings capacity and pain suffering caused by spinal cord damages.

Recognizing every case carries its own unique set of challenges; we deliver tailored strategies prioritizing clients’ specific needs. This personalized approach enables us in doggedly pursuing justice on multiple fronts: holding culpable parties accountable for the negligence causing these severe repercussions; navigating insurance complexities effortlessly ensuring full benefits’ retrieval; negotiating fair settlements that truly reflect the emotional trauma endured alongside physical ailments.

Should trial litigation emerge as an inevitable route rather than negotiation process, rest aware that our adept litigators carry extensive courtroom experience. Their polished advocacy skills and strategic contention delivery have consistently advanced our clients’ interests.

Moreover, we believe in lifting your burdens, not adding to them. That’s why you’ll find our ‘no recovery, no fee’ provision exceptionally beneficial where legal fees are only imposed once successful recovery is made for clients.

We emphasize on empowering our clientele with knowledge while we work vigorously behind the scenes advocating their rights. In light of this objective, we regularly update our online resources illustrating latest legal precedence concerning spinal cord injuries or illuminating potential implications manifested by these traumatic injuries.

Taking on a personal injury claim following a spinal cord injury certainly feels daunting and intimidating. But remember, you are not alone in this struggle; Carlson Bier stands firm as your staunch ally through these trying times ensuring opinions are heard and justice prevailed.

Trusted guidance announcing viable alternatives along the way would boost confidence enabling informed decisions that best fit respective circumstances. To facilitate informed decision-making process further still without added financial pressure – we offer free initial consultations extending an unhindered gateway to explore potential paths forward pertaining legal claims without any binding commitments; should working together appear to be most beneficial route moving onward – Newman Law Group welcome all.

As a fellow Illinoisan navigating choppy seas amidst adversarial conditions laden by a potentially lifelong burden such as spinal cord damage: We invite you towards taking control back from unjust circumstances inflicted upon you. Your steadfast fortitude deserves unequivocal recognition translated into rightful restitution – adherence asserting fair play correspondingly mocks at the injustice endured bringing it rightfully under determined scrutiny and apt penalization.

There’s no standardized arrangement expressing comprehensive repercussions experienced via spinal cord damages; similar vein curtails definitive amounts applicable for recompense effectively varying client-by-client basis case intricacies demanding due diligence relentlessly voicing out unique grievances each merits distinct assessment qualified experts anchoring compensation equation determination accordingly.

Catering holistic representation addressing multidimensional challenges trailed via catastrophic injuries Royal Waldman extend unflinching support recognized comprehensively. No challenge is insurmountable and with persistent resilience, we ensure every hurdle is surpassed fundamentally focusing on well-being rehabilitation ancillary to rightful compensation attainment. Realize your fundamental right to just compensation – click the button below and discover the worth of your case today! You don’t have to face this alone; Carlson Bier champions readily by your side driving justice rightfully yours homebound.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Freeburg Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Freeburg

Areas of Practice in Freeburg

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Expert in legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' negligence or risky conditions.

Scald Burns

Extending specialist legal services for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or misconduct.

Medical Negligence

Providing professional legal services for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Accountability

Addressing cases involving faulty products, offering adept legal assistance to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Senior Mistreatment

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble and Slip Occurrences

Expert in handling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to persons seeking compensation for their damages.

Newborn Wounds

Delivering legal support for kin affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Incidents

Accidents: Focused on helping patients of car accidents receive reasonable compensation for hurts and destruction.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Expert in providing legal advice for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Truck Collision

Offering experienced legal support for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate recompense for losses.

Construction Crashes

Committed to advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Brain Traumas

Committed to delivering expert legal advice for persons suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Injuries

Expertise in addressing cases for victims who have suffered harms from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Accidents

Expert in legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Passing

Striving for relatives affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and professional legal guidance to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Specializing in assisting clients with paralysis, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​