FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Gary

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re seeking professional legal representation for spinal cord injury cases in Gary, look no further than Carlson Bier. Our specialized team of personal injury lawyers are experts in dealing with complex spinal cord injuries litigation. Advancing your interests is our primary goal – we value your trust and we work tirelessly to justify it. What sets us apart? Not only do we bring a track record of demonstrable success to the table, but also compassionate service that understands the emotional toll such injuries can take. We champion an integrated approach which combines meticulous reviews of medical reports, strong negotiation skills and aggressive courtroom advocacy if required. At Carlson Bier, we possess deep knowledge about various facets of spinal cord injury law, hence guaranteeing top-notch counsel for every case that comes under our ambit. Opting for any less might result in inadequate compensation or unmet claims—therefore choose wisely; choose experience; choose diligence—choose Carlson Bier.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Gary Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a dedicated group of personal injury attorneys based in Illinois who understand the detrimental impact that spinal cord injuries can have on your quality of life. We dedicate our extensive knowledge and expert resources to helping those affected by such catastrophic injuries to reclaim their rights and access the compensation they deserve.

A spinal cord injury refers to any damage to the spinal cord or nerves at its end, which often results in permanent changes including loss of strength, sensation, or other body functions below the site of the injury. It is fundamentally crucial for potential clients like you to grasp clear insights on this condition. For that reason, we’ve prepared categorical information about spinal cord injuries for your comprehension:

• Severity: Injuries range from complete – where all feeling and voluntary muscle control are lost, to incomplete – where some functioning still remains.

• Location: A higher location on the vertebral column usually means more severe consequences.

• Paraplegia vs Quadriplegia: While paraplegia affects both legs and sometimes parts of the trunk, quadriplegia affects both arms, both legs as well as the trunk and typically signals a more significant level of injury.

Living with a spinal cord injury requires immense adaptation physically and emotionally. Often individuals suffer financial burden due to mounting medical expenses along with an inability to work. Here at Carlson Bier, it is our mission as personal injury lawyers not only help you navigate through this challenging time but providing legal services tailored exclusively according to your needs.

Furthermore, regarding liability in spinal cord cases hinges on three critical points:

1) Duty – The defendant owed a duty of care towards you

2) Breach – The defendant acted negligently breaching said duty

3) Causation- Such negligent actions resulted directly causing your spine injuries.

Spinal Cord Injury claimants should know several important factors can influence settlements including; severity and permanence of the physical impairment; projected future medical costs; and the nature of negligence leading to the injury.

At Carlson Bier we are skilled personal injury attorneys with a wealth of experience. We have consistently fought for victims, ensuring that they get fair compensation tailored not just to their current expenses, but projected future requirements as well – here in Illinois, where our law office is physically present.

We would like you to be informed about one important Illinois advertising law: It is against Illinois statute to advertise a legal practitioner’s service if they do not maintain a physical office within said location. Refreshingly, we are completely compliant with this legislation – hence all our advertised services originate from our base here in Illinois.

Coming out victorious in legal battles requires more than just an understanding of spinal cord injuries. It demands partnership with seasoned professionals who possess thorough knowledge on intricate complexities involved intertwining the terms of your individual case and specific state laws guiding such actions. With modern dynamics reshaping personal injury law every day, having veteran attorneys by your side makes a monumental difference – that’s what Carlson Bier promises to provide.

Running around will not help mitigate these dire circumstances when faced with an overwhelming journey due to your injuries. You deserve experienced lawyers who empathetically understand what you’re going through – that’s us at Carlson Bier- Personal Injury Lawyers firmly located and serving clients across various counties within Illinois state exclusively.

Having taken this journey through valuable insights about spinal cord injuries, why leave anything else uncertain? Click below! Let’s find out how much your case could potentially be worth together! Because no matter how complex or challenging it may seem today- remember tomorrow begins right now.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Gary Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Gary

Areas of Practice in Gary

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Dedicated to legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or perilous conditions.

Thermal Damages

Providing skilled legal services for people of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Clinical Carelessness

Extending professional legal services for persons affected by healthcare malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Fault

Taking on cases involving faulty products, extending skilled legal help to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Neglect

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip and Slip Mishaps

Adept in managing stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking recovery for their injuries.

Neonatal Injuries

Offering legal aid for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Accidents: Committed to aiding individuals of car accidents secure fair settlement for hurts and harm.

Scooter Crashes

Dedicated to providing legal support for individuals involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

18-Wheeler Crash

Providing adept legal assistance for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for hurts.

Building Accidents

Committed to representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Cerebral Harms

Committed to delivering specialized legal support for clients suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Damages

Skilled in addressing cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Dedicated to legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Demise

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and professional legal support to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Expert in advocating for persons with spinal cord injuries, offering compassionate legal services to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​