Bicycle Accidents in Geneseo

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve unfortunately been involved in a bicycle accident in Geneseo, Carlson Bier is the law firm you need by your side. With an esteemed reputation and extensive experience handling personal injury cases throughout Illinois, they stand as a formidable ally to victims of such incidents. They have mastered the complex legal jargon that can often shroud bicycle accident laws and regulations, effectively simplifying these complexities for their clients while advocating relentlessly on their behalf. Going beyond simple representation, Carlson Bier delves deep into their investigation and fact-finding activities to unearth crucial details instrumental to securing your compensation rights fully. Often stemming from driver’s negligence or unsafe infrastructure, bike accidents may lead to physical injury, emotional trauma or even financial instability; issues which Carlson Bier understands profoundly hence offering outstanding litigation capabilities at every step of the legal proceedings pertaining bicycle accidents. Trust them with your case today; because when it comes to serving justice following bike mishaps within Illinois boundaries – there are few who do it as proficiently as Carlson Bier does!

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Geneseo Illinois

As seasoned personal injury attorneys at Carlson Bier, we understand the complexities of dealing with bicycle accidents in Illinois. We’re fully committed to educating you about potential legal actions surrounding such incidents while guiding you through unforeseen circumstances towards fair compensation.

Bicycle accidents can result in severe injuries and considerable medical expenses. Carlson Bier’s team of dedicated lawyers is incredibly knowledgeable about bicycle accident cases, familiar with every nuance of Illinois law pertaining to bicyclists’ rights and responsibilities on the road.

• Fault Determination: As simple as it might seem, determining who’s at fault in a bike accident isn’t always straightforward. Evidence collection, witnesses’ statements, and reviewing police reports play critical roles.

• Statute of Limitations: In Illinois, there is a two-year limitation period for filing personal injury claims from bike accidents. Missing this deadline may forfeit your right to compensation.

• Insurance Negotiations: Insurance companies often employ tactics to minimize pay-outs. Our skilled team adeptly negotiates with these companies ensuring that you get what you truly deserve.

• Type Of Compensation: Recoverable damages following a bicycle accident may include payment for medical bills, lost wages due to missed workdays, pain and suffering endured because of the incident or any permanent disability caused by the incident.

Despite best efforts toward safety preservations like wearing helmets and using bike lanes, cycling dangers persist. Major causes contributing to these risks are usually drivers ignoring bikers’ rights-of-way or not giving them enough space; distracted or intoxicated driving exacerbates these risks. Regardless of how careful cyclists are while commuting on busy Aurora streets or peaceful Naperville pathways – they remain uniquely vulnerable due to their exposed position.

Our efficacy stems from deep understanding coupled with aggressive advocacy wherein our legal juggernaut fights tooth-and-nail till justice isn’t just apparent but irrefutably conclusive for each bereaved client post-bicycle accidents. Comprehensive breadth doesn’t compromise singular attention where Carlson Bier‘s each specific bike accident case is meticulously planned and intelligently argued before the court ensuring optimal results.

Our sterling reputation as diligent attorneys with a proven track record in bicycle injury cases attests to our commitment. We’re not just another law firm – we’re partners you can wholly rely on when navigating through these legal challenges.

Already fighting an uphill battle against injuries, pain and mounting bills, victims hardly need additional stress of going it alone. Be aware that once representation from Carlson Bier is sought, insurance adjusters erstwhile truculent tone metamorphoses instantly into respectful listening mode – abiding by rules and refraining from any unsolicited contact directly with the client; thereby letting us shoulder your burden while you focus solely on recovery.

Staying cognizant of cyclists’ unique vulnerabilities also points towards pre-accident preparations such as wearing visible clothing, appropriately signaling turns or maneuvers and always following traffic laws diligently which significantly mitigate chances for life-threatening catastrophes ensuring safer roads for all Illinoisans.

Now that you’re equipped with this valuable insight about bicycle accidents along with associated legal remedies under Illinois laws, we urge you to further explore compensation options befitting your specific case. Knowing what’s at stake after leaving stones unturned, could you really afford not serenely probing what justice might look like for your personal case? Taking action promptly has quantifiable ramifications over life-enhancing measures over months spent recuperating physically and mentally post-bicycle tragedic dreadfulness owed to some other party’s neglect or insouciance.

Click the button below to determine your potential claim’s value reflecting rightful compensation for your sufferings at no upfront cost whatsoever – drawing satisfaction knowing experts at Carlson Bier are self-seriously striving ensuring adequate shining light at the end of this tiresome tunnel spanning sore throes between peaceful pasts till even sweeter forthcoming futures.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Geneseo Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Geneseo

Areas of Practice in Geneseo

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Expert in legal assistance for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or perilous conditions.

Burn Traumas

Supplying professional legal advice for victims of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Hospital Carelessness

Delivering expert legal advice for persons affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Accountability

Managing cases involving problematic products, offering professional legal support to victims affected by faulty goods.

Senior Misconduct

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble and Slip Occurrences

Expert in managing stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking redress for their losses.

Neonatal Injuries

Supplying legal support for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Car Collisions

Incidents: Concentrated on assisting sufferers of car accidents secure appropriate settlement for injuries and damages.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Specializing in providing legal advice for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for losses.

Truck Mishap

Delivering adept legal support for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair recompense for harms.

Construction Site Accidents

Committed to representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Neurological Injuries

Specializing in ensuring specialized legal services for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Traumas

Skilled in addressing cases for clients who have suffered traumas from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Crashes

Specializing in legal assistance for walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Fatality

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and skilled legal support to ensure redress.

Neural Impairment

Committed to supporting victims with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal representation to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer