FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Geneseo

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the aftermath of a dog bite injury in Geneseo, turn to Carlson Bier for unparalleled legal guidance. Expertise defines our practice; we comprehend the nuances and intricacies surmounting dog bite laws in Illinois. Showcasing an exceptional record handling similar cases, our attorneys ensure you receive deserved compensation for physical and emotional distress endured. We skillfully negotiate with insurance adjusters on your behalf while vigorously protecting your rights in court if necessary. Most importantly, navigating this stressful period won’t be a lone battle; upfront since initial consultation marking case grounds through settlement receipt or trial verdict, we’re right beside you every step. Moreover, at Carlson Bier clients are more than case files – their peace of mind is always paramount to us so adopting tailored strategies meeting individual objectives comes naturally here. Challenging times require assured support – choose Carlson Bier as Dog Bite Injuries attorney group committed unwaveringly to representing your interests effectively based on expertise grounded within Illinois jurisdictional confinements.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Geneseo Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we appreciate that you’re here with us, learning more about aspects of personal injury law that may impact you directly. One such area is dog bite injuries. In Illinois alone, countless people grapple annually with the physical and emotional fallout from these unexpected and traumatic events. Understanding your rights when involved in a dog bite incident can greatly influence what steps to take next.

Dog bites, unfortunately, are common in our state and across the nation. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimate nearly 4.7 million instances of dog-related injuries occur in the US each year. Notably, one in five of these incidents result in injuries severe enough to require medical intervention or even long-term care.

Yet it’s critical to understand not every instance results in complete financial responsibility falling on the animal owner or keeper. Illinois operates under terms of strict liability regarding dog bite accidents. This holds the individual responsible whether they knew their pet was dangerous or not at the time of attack:

• There must be proof this person is actually the pet’s owner.

• The injured party did nothing to provoke behaviour leading up to attack.

• Lastly, there must exist no trespassing; i.e., victim did not unlawfully enter premises thus prompting defense behavior from pet.

These points form building blocks toward a compelling case if you experience an unfortunate event like this.

It behooves victims also to know typical types and severity of repercussions inherent after confronting such traumatic experiences. Wide-ranging physical negative outcomes resulting from this include – puncture wounds, nerve damage plus deep bruising are frequent immediate issues subsequent significant attacks by dogs leave behind:

• Emotional trauma: Victims often suffer extreme anxiety or post-traumatic stress disorder well beyond recovery timeline physical injuries require.

• Scarring/disfigurement: Some attacks inflict permanent facial or body disfigurement requiring intense surgical intervention.

• Rabies/other infections: Uncommon but still potential risks include bacterial infections resulting from bite wounds.

• Time off work: Healing periods post-attack may extend greater than one’s sick leave allowance, bringing broader financial implications with them.

The aftermath of such incidents frequently comes entwined with additional emotional distress, significant loss in quality of life, or even severe psychological ramifications. Hearteningly, Illinois law provides for recovery of these costs plus other damages under appropriate circumstances.

Are you personally navigating choppy waters around this terrain at present? Has a dog bite disrupted your life in dramatic ways recently? These situations are daunting to handle alone and aligning with qualified legal representation can make vital differences. Familiarity regarding intricacies within Illinois laws related to canine-inflicted harm is integral towards achieving proper compensation relative your conclusive pain and suffering caused by the incident.

At Carlson Bier Personal Injury Attorneys, we’re here to stand shoulder-to-shoulder together with you throughout this journey. With experienced attorneys possessing profound expertise regarding these complex matters, we commit towards ensuring honest conversations throughout process entirety guiding us toward satisfactory resolution.

Why go it alone when expert guidance – steeped in knowledge of intricate state statutes – is just a click away? We want you informed enough to make educated decisions about seeking potential remedies available according to nuanced aspects pertinent within Illinois legislation spectrum. Take that first empowering step right now! Engage the button below and gain an immediate snapshot showing what value your distinct case holds. Armed with solid knowledge from the offset presents you with winning choices moving forward – let Carlson Bier help guide your path today!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Geneseo Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Geneseo

Areas of Practice in Geneseo

Bicycle Accidents

Specializing in legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or risky conditions.

Thermal Burns

Extending expert legal help for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Medical Carelessness

Ensuring specialist legal assistance for victims affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Responsibility

Handling cases involving defective products, offering professional legal guidance to victims affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Neglect

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring justice.

Tumble & Fall Occurrences

Adept in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking redress for their damages.

Newborn Harms

Offering legal assistance for families affected by medical incompetence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Mishaps

Mishaps: Committed to assisting victims of car accidents get appropriate remuneration for injuries and damages.

Scooter Mishaps

Dedicated to providing legal services for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

18-Wheeler Accident

Ensuring professional legal support for persons involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for losses.

Building Incidents

Focused on advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Cognitive Traumas

Dedicated to ensuring compassionate legal assistance for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Harms

Skilled in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered harms from dog bites or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Crashes

Focused on legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Demise

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering caring and experienced legal guidance to ensure restitution.

Spine Injury

Committed to advocating for victims with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal services to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440