...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Germantown

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the wake of a dog bite incident, choosing Carlson Bier is your best legal course. As leading personal injury lawyers, we specialize in Dog Bite Injuries law, offering unparalleled expertise. Our assurance to Germantown’s residents extends towards safeguarding their rights and providing them with deserved compensation for any suffered injuries or trauma due to dog bites. Rather than claiming to be physically present in Germantown, our aim is mainly directed at serving its inhabitants with first-rate legal services remotely from Illinois, ensuring efficient resolution of dog bite cases regardless of distance barriers. What sets Carlson Bier apart from others? At the heart of our service is a dedicated team adept at navigating through complex lawsuit procedurals while prioritizing clients’ needs above all else; an advantage well-reflected by our proven track record in securing justice against wrongful canine-related inflictions. Availing the exceptional services offered by Carlson Bier reassures victims that they have entrusted their cause into capable hands unfazed by adversities emanating from geographical constraints or case complexities inherent within dog bite injury litigations.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Germantown Illinois

Dog bite injuries can be traumatizing and complex matters to handle, leaving you with not just physical but emotional scars that could last a lifetime. If you or a loved one has been unfortunate enough to experience such an event, Carlson Bier is your go-to personal injury law firm in Illinois equipped with the knowledge and resources to robustly represent victims of dog bite incidents.

Based on years of handling such cases, we understand that each incident tells a unique story. Some result in minor wounds needing medicinal care only; others lead to severe lacerations necessitating surgeries along with psychological consequences, prolonged pain, disfigurement and even loss of life as far as worst-case scenarios go.

There are salient points to note about Dog Bite Injuries:

– The role of the owner: Unlike vehicular accidents where fault-determination might take time, identifying responsibility in dog bite encounters is quite straightforward – primarily falling on the pet’s owner.

– State laws: Illinois operates under ‘strict liability’ rules regarding dog bites which means that owners cannot escape legal responsibility except their dogs were provoked or if victims were trespassing when bitten.

Ultimately, receiving full compensation in these cases depends on proper representation from experienced attorneys who can navigate local regulations whilst fighting for victim rights – this is where Carlson Bier comes into play. Our experienced team recruits expert witnesses and employs advanced methods for evidence collection including reports and testimonies to develop comprehensive case strategies tailored specifically for you.

Our approach blends compassion with resilience. We empathize genuinely with each client’s ordeal – using it ever so often as our thrust motivation while aggressively surmounting any hurdle thrown our way during negotiations – shielding clients from insurance companies looking to diminish claim worth invariably.

At Carlson Bier, we believe that everyone deserves detailed comprehensible legal counsel regardless of their background. Thus we have established an uncomplicated system enabling potential clients easy access to consult us about possible claims without commitment stress. This mutual review process allows us to understand the details of your case better while giving you the opportunity to appraise our capabilities and work style.

Apart from Dog Bite Injuries, we are also adept at handling various other personal injury cases including medical malpractice, car accidents, workers’ compensation amongst others. Our profound understanding of different jurisdictional laws coupled with patient fact-collecting allows us to provide astounding legal representation – passionately pushing for justice till clients receive due compensation.

Now that you have understood the nuances of dog bite injuries as well as Carlson Bier’s distinctive role in aiding victims navigate their legal journey with relative ease, feel free to explore further how much value we can bring to your specific situation by clicking on the button below.

Let our qualified team use its vast experience and knowledge garnered over years dealing with injury laws within Illinois precincts where we run a dedicated law office physically (it is against Illinois state law to advertise that one operates offices in cities where none exist) to provide just the kind of personalized high quality assistance suited best for helping Dog Bite Injury victims turn new chapters positively in life.

Given our track record and principles centered around holistic client satisfaction via exhaustive yet understandable guidance every step of recovery, it is no surprise why many regard us one among the most trusted names when seeking effective personal injury lawyer services throughout Illinois.

There’s never been a more critical time than now to find out how much your case is worth. Don’t let uncertainty linger any longer; click on the button below right now and get started on reclaiming control and closure after your unfortunate ordeal. Your peace-of-mind could be just clicks away.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Germantown Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Germantown

Areas of Practice in Germantown

Cycling Mishaps

Proficient in legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Fire Wounds

Extending expert legal services for people of serious burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Physician Malpractice

Delivering expert legal representation for persons affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Obligation

Addressing cases involving defective products, extending professional legal help to victims affected by faulty goods.

Elder Misconduct

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall & Tumble Injuries

Skilled in dealing with fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking compensation for their injuries.

Birth Harms

Supplying legal guidance for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Incidents

Incidents: Devoted to helping patients of car accidents secure appropriate settlement for wounds and harm.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Committed to providing legal assistance for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

Semi Incident

Offering experienced legal assistance for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for damages.

Construction Site Accidents

Dedicated to supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Neurological Traumas

Specializing in ensuring expert legal services for victims suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Harms

Proficient in addressing cases for victims who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Focused on legal support for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Unfair Passing

Working for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering sensitive and expert legal assistance to ensure redress.

Spine Harm

Dedicated to supporting persons with spinal cord injuries, offering dedicated legal support to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​