...

Bicycle Accidents in Gifford

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the face of a bicycle accident, seeking expert legal advice is crucial to protect your rights. Carlson Bier, an esteemed personal injury law firm deeply knowledgeable about Illinois legislation, is well-equipped to handle such cases with excellence and proven results. Having handled numerous bicycle accidents in diverse jurisdictions including Gifford, our attorneys undoubtedly understand the intricate nuances associated with these types of incidents. They bring unrivalled legal expertise and keen advocacy skills to each case they undertake; hence providing clients unmatched support throughout their recovery journey while also ensuring maximum compensation for their losses. With a unique depth in unraveling complex accident scenarios or dealing with elusive insurance claims adjusters that are commonplace after bike accidents, we have established ourselves as leading choice among those seeking objective counsel on this matter near Gifford area.Your best chance at restitution following a bike accident rests firmly in the capable hands of Carlson Bier’s professional team- designed around your needs because your right to fair justice matters most.

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Gifford Illinois

Welcome to the Carlson Bier, your trusted personal injury law firm based in Illinois. Our expertise spans a broad spectrum of personal injury cases including an intricate field that’s gaining increasing relevance – Bicycle Accidents. Understanding the circumstances and complexities surrounding bicycle accidents becomes essential not just for cyclists but every road user.

A bicycle accident can unfold due to numerous factors which encompass everything from traffic violations by motorists, poor road maintenance or design flaws, defective cycling equipment to violation of cyclist rights on roads. Here are some common scenarios often encountered:

• Cyclist getting doored: This happens when an opened car door blocks a cyclist’s path unexpectedly.

• Right cross: A motorist pulls out from a right side street unknowingly into the cyclist’s path.

• Left Cross: A left-turning vehicle hits a straight-going cyclist.

In such scenarios, our knowledgeable legal team at Carlson Bier is well equipped to assist you and guide you through each step of the complex litigation process.

Cyclists are afforded the same rights as motorists under Illinois law and must be given their due respect while sharing roadway space. The failure to acknowledge cyclists’ lawful status on roads often lead to tragic outcomes that could have easily been avoided with proper understanding. We believe everyone should know about these key points concerning bicyclists’ rights:

• Motorists cannot block a designated bike lane intentionally.

• Traffic signals and signs apply equally to bicyclists.

• In no case can bicycles be run off the road deliberately by vehicles.

Bicycle injuries can range from minor sprains or fractures all the way through severe traumatic brain injuries or even death. If negligence is proven on part of other parties involved in the accident — whether they be another driver, local municipality or cycle manufacturer — victims may have grounds for compensation due to pain, suffering or monetary losses ensued.

Working through all this information may seem overwhelming especially in light of sustaining an upheaval like an accident; nonetheless remember that knowledge is empowering. Seeking legal help can smooth the path to rightful compensation and returning to normalcy after a dreadful bicycle accident, ideally preventing future accidents.

Navigating the personal injury law landscape in Illinois isn’t something you have to do alone — Carlson Bier has your back through it all. Armed with experience, expertise and compassion for our clients, we play an essential role in ensuring fair compensation for damages incurred. This includes factors such as medical costs associated to the injuries sustained in bicycle accidents, potential loss of income due even temporary disability or even pain and trauma induced suffering.

We urge every individual who’s been a victim of a bicycle accident not just to use this information for their own cases but also spread awareness about cyclist rights and safety issues amongst community members.

Bicycle accidents are indeed stressful both physically and mentally. However, gaining rightful compensation crucially rests on swift reporting of the incident; collection of relevant evidence like photographs of accident site, eyewitness accounts or medical reports; careful analysis focused on defendant’s liability; proficient handling negotiations leveraging sound understanding of how insurance operates – tasks deftly handled by us at Carlson Bier.

If you feel your recent bike accident could be battled legally armed with better understanding now thanks to comprehensive guide here combined with expert counsel at hand – take action today itself! Click on the button below for one quick check determining possible worth of your case. Remember each situation bears unique circumstances therefore it’s best discussed individually with our dedicated team at Carlson Bier – we’re here ready to serve while hoping for safer roads shared equally by bicyclists and motorists alike throughout Illinois.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Gifford Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Gifford

Areas of Practice in Gifford

Bike Accidents

Dedicated to legal assistance for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Scald Damages

Giving expert legal services for people of major burn injuries caused by accidents or carelessness.

Physician Misconduct

Offering dedicated legal representation for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Responsibility

Addressing cases involving problematic products, delivering specialist legal help to consumers affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in nursing homes environments, ensuring justice.

Fall & Trip Mishaps

Specialist in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking restitution for their damages.

Newborn Harms

Extending legal help for families affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Crashes: Concentrated on supporting clients of car accidents get equitable remuneration for hurts and impairment.

Bike Accidents

Expert in providing legal advice for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring fair compensation for damages.

Big Rig Crash

Providing expert legal advice for persons involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for hurts.

Building Site Collisions

Focused on representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Harms

Specializing in providing dedicated legal services for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Traumas

Expertise in addressing cases for persons who have suffered damages from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Focused on legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Unwarranted Fatality

Working for relatives affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and professional legal support to ensure restitution.

Backbone Impairment

Dedicated to assisting persons with spinal cord injuries, offering expert legal assistance to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer