...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Medical Malpractice Attorney in Gifford

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Trust the significant experience of Carlson Bier to guide and represent you in times of medical malpractice needs. Here rests an esteemed team, unwavering in their commitment to justice and a client-first approach, marked by tireless advocacy for victims of medical negligence throughout Illinois. We believe that every individual deserves quality healthcare; thus, any deviation from it demands a robust response, which we are proud deliver with precision and passion. Medical missteps can occur anywhere – hospitals, nursing homes or clinics – causing untold suffering on patients’ wellbeing and destroying families’ lives overnight. The aftermath can be bewildering and stressful: daunting insurance disputes or intricate legal battles could become your daily ordeal unexpectedly —but they don’t have to be! Carlson Bier is firmly rooted herein as expert allies redefining what’s possible for insurmountable challenges through strategic action whilst assuring ethical compliance-unyielding under scrutiny- ensuring support that goes beyond expectations at every juncture along this difficult journey towards fairness.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Gifford Illinois

Welcoming you to the hub of personal injury legal solutions, we present Carlson Bier, an eminent law group based in Illinois. We command a sterling reputation for providing exceptional service and successful results focusing primarily on matters dealing with Medical Malpractice. As trusted personal injury attorneys, our goal is to empower you through comprehensive knowledge while championing your rights both in and out of the courtroom.

When it comes to medical malpractice cases, understanding how they come into being is critical. This type of case usually emerges when a healthcare provider fails to abide by standards set forth in the healthcare industry, resulting in patient harm or even fatality. Despite sounding straightforward, navigating a medical malpractice suit can be exceptionally complex due largely to defining what constitutes reasonable care – something that varies from case-to-case. Thus, having proficient lawyers like us advocating for your rights ensures fair treatment during this challenging time.

Breaking down the intricacies of what makes a substantial medical malpractice claim will shed more light on these situations:

1) Negligence: A key requisite for any claim is establishing that negligence occurred on part of the healthcare professional.

2) Causation: Linking the negligent behavior directly to adverse effects experienced by the patient is crucial.

3) Damage: For any claim worth arguing in court, showing real damage or suffering because of negligence proves essential.

We at Carlson Bier know extensively about these parameters surrounding such sensitive claims as our dedicated experts examine each aspect carefully before proceeding with lawsuits. Our prowess combined with compassion interiorizes clients’ sentiments and reassures them throughout this arduous journey.

Furthermore, we believe that addressing misconceptions around medical malpractice can mitigate uncertainties clouding prospective clients’ minds:

– All unfavorable outcomes do not necessarily entail negligence

– Filing a lawsuit does not automatically guarantee payouts; proving negligence remains paramount

– Not every unfortunate incident equates to grounds for filing claims

By focusing on debunking myths while directing attention to facts, we work towards increased client awareness and strategic legal planning.

Committed to ensuring that everyone who walks through our doors is greeted with empathy, knowledge, and a fighting spirit, Carlson Bier stands in unwavering solidarity with victims of medical malpractice. Our aim is not just winning every case – it’s about bringing justice where it belongs; restoring balance whenever disturbed by harm inflicted due to medical negligence.

Keeping you informed and educated on the tedious process involved in a medical malpractice claim is embedded within our core principles. Now that we have outlined the fundamental aspects surrounding such cases from definitions to misconceptions, take this opportunity to click the button below. Find out what your case could potentially be worth should you decide to pursue legal action for any injury incurred through supposed negligent behavior of healthcare practitioners. Trust Carlson Bier for all-encompassing legal solutions in Illinois, minus misleading contentions about geographic presence at places like Gifford.

Indeed, success favors those prepared enough not just to understand their predicaments but also seek appropriate counsel and hold corresponding parties accountable. As stalwarts in personal injury law based in Illinois, Carlson Bier pledges unwavering dedication towards facilitating clarity amidst chaos generated by medical malpractices while safeguarding rights ardently until justice prevails. Trust us as your go-to personal injury lawyers capable of crafting solid strategies aligning best with clients’ interests resulting in optimal outcomes they rightfully deserve.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Gifford Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Gifford

Areas of Practice in Gifford

Bike Mishaps

Specializing in legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Damages

Extending professional legal assistance for patients of serious burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Hospital Carelessness

Delivering expert legal advice for persons affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Liability

Dealing with cases involving defective products, delivering professional legal support to individuals affected by defective items.

Senior Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in aged care environments, ensuring protection.

Fall & Stumble Accidents

Specialist in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to persons seeking redress for their harm.

Newborn Injuries

Delivering legal support for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Crashes: Concentrated on supporting victims of car accidents secure appropriate remuneration for damages and damages.

Bike Mishaps

Committed to providing legal support for individuals involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

Truck Collision

Delivering specialist legal services for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for losses.

Construction Accidents

Concentrated on supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Cognitive Impairments

Committed to extending compassionate legal advice for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Traumas

Adept at managing cases for persons who have suffered injuries from dog bites or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Committed to legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Fatality

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and professional legal assistance to ensure justice.

Vertebral Impairment

Expert in representing individuals with spine impairments, offering specialized legal assistance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​