...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Gillespie

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve experienced a dog bite injury in Gillespie, Illinois, choose Carlson Bier. Skilled ins and outs of the complex legalities surrounding personal injuries, we take immense pride in representing victims of animal-related incidents. We understand how vicious a dog attack can be leaving one scarred both physically and emotionally. With years of expertise under our belts; our streamlined team provides personalized attention to your case ensuring a fair recoupment for medical bills & emotional trauma among other losses. At Carlson Bier; justice isn’t just an ideal – it’s something we relentlessly strive to achieve for you along with imparting necessary guidance regarding stringent Illinois laws pertinent to dog bite cases such as The Animal Control Act or Dog Owner’s Liability statute aiding best possible compensation recovery while navigating tricky insurance dealings simultaneously . Trust us at Carlson Bier – A powerful ally equipped unequivocally effectuating actions suitable for clients throughout this challenging process devoting wholeheartedly towards alleviating undue distress surrounding unfortunate canine encounters consistently striving to uphold your rights paramountly.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Gillespie Illinois

At Carlson Bier, an eminent personal injury legal firm in Illinois, our attorneys are well-versed and proficient in dealing with a diverse array of injury cases, including those involving dog bite injuries. Our commitment to justice and unparalleled advocacy has made us a beacon of trust amongst our clients over time.

Dog bite injuries are indeed more frequent than one might expect. Yet many people underestimate the potential aftermath and remain oblivious to the need for obtaining legal assistance. Such mishaps can inflict not just physical damages but also emotional trauma which may persist long after the incident itself.

The specific laws governing dog bite incidences vary across states; however, in Illinois, owners can be held accountable if their dogs cause physical harm or injury to someone without provocation while they were lawfully present on public or private property. This principle comes under strict liability rule implying that regardless of how careful an owner was in preventing a dog from biting others, he/she would still be responsible for any damage caused by the pet.

Key aspects following a dog bite incident include:

· Fulfilling medical obligations – Immediate medical attention is necessary irrespective of severity.

· Gathering evidence – Photos of your injuries as well as details about the location and relevant witness accounts provide valuable insights.

· Reporting to local agencies – Informing animal control officials will notify them about a potentially dangerous dog.

· Maintaining records – It is advisable to document all related expenses incurred.

Also significant is understanding what compensation covers after a dog bite incidence. It often extends beyond medical bills to cover lost wages during recovery period, pain/suffering and sometimes even emotional distress caused due to such traumatic event.

As experts at Carlson Bier consistently uncovering layers of complexity inherent within Illinois’ personal injury law territory, we work dedicatedly towards securing maximum compensation for you with minimal fuss on your part. Our team comprehends not only the intricacies involved but also appreciates that each case maintains unique attributes that deserve individual attention.

With Carlson Bier, you not only access an exceptional team of seasoned lawyers but also engage with a trusted ally who is there amidst the waves of uncertainty to guide and assist through this complex process. We arm you with thorough understanding about your rights and legal options, ensuring that the pivot toward recovery doesn’t impact your day-to-day life.

In case you are dealing with dog bite injuries in Illinois, it’s time to take advantage of our expertise. After all, addressing and navigating such issues require more than goodwill alone – they demand diligence born out of extensive experience backed by capable shoulders willing to bear the burden in pursuit of justice for those affected.

Furthermore, acknowledging how each detail can make or break a case outcome makes us particularly astute at examining everything minutely right from initial consultation up until successful resolution.

Curious about what your claim could be worth? It’s easier than ever before to find out. Click on the “Find Out What Your Case Is Worth” button below for expert analysis tailored just for you by our skilled personal injury lawyers.

At Carlson Bier, we understand what’s at stake after a dog bite incident. Let us make this journey towards recompense smoother and less daunting for you while ensuring that justice prevails eventually.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Gillespie Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Gillespie

Areas of Practice in Gillespie

Bike Collisions

Dedicated to legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or hazardous conditions.

Burn Injuries

Supplying adept legal assistance for victims of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Healthcare Misconduct

Extending professional legal assistance for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Fault

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, providing adept legal assistance to victims affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Neglect

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble & Stumble Accidents

Expert in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking restitution for their losses.

Infant Harms

Supplying legal guidance for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Collisions

Collisions: Committed to helping clients of car accidents receive reasonable settlement for damages and destruction.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Dedicated to providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

18-Wheeler Crash

Offering specialist legal assistance for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for injuries.

Building Site Incidents

Focused on supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or recklessness.

Brain Traumas

Committed to extending compassionate legal services for persons suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Wounds

Adept at addressing cases for clients who have suffered damages from dog bites or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Specializing in legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Loss

Working for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and adept legal support to ensure compensation.

Neural Injury

Committed to representing victims with spinal cord injuries, offering expert legal representation to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​