...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Gilman

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When a dog bite injury occurs in Gilman, your best opportunity for justice resides with Carlson Bier. As prominent personal injury lawyers specializing in dog bite cases, we thoroughly understand Illinois legislation to navigate the complexities of your case. Skilled litigation is our cornerstone; with an impeccable record of winning compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering or lost wages due to recovery time. We’re adept at proving negligence on part of the owner allowing you to focus solely on healing without added stress. The devastating effect it may have physically, emotionally and financially is not something you should bear alone – our expertise allows us to represent victims effectively, ensuring their rights are upheld during proceedings. Choosing Carlson Bier means trusting a firm whose reputation precedes its name where others fall short—our commitment doesn’t end with obtaining fair compensation rather counseling through trauma towards reclaiming normalcy after such an unexpected catastrophe.. Trust none but expert law firms like ours for handling intricate Dog Bite Injury cases.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Gilman Illinois

Dog bites can result in severe physical, emotional and financial damages. If you are victim of a dog bite injury in Illinois, Carlson Bier Advocates have the experience and knowledge to help guide you through this challenging ordeal. We specialize in personal injury law, with an emphasis on dog bite legal cases — helping our clients claim the compensation they are rightfully entitled to under state laws.

Understanding the key facts about Illinois dog bite laws can be instrumental for your case. For instance, did you realize that under most circumstances, pet owners are legally responsible for any injuries their dogs cause? Dog owners cannot escape liability by claiming not to have been aware of their dog’s aggressive tendencies. This principle is also applicable even when the incident occurs outside the owner’s premises. It is important to manuver these complexities with the assistance of experienced attorneys like those at Carlson Bier Advocates.

The immediate aftermath of a dog bite can be quite alarming; however there are certain steps that victims should aim to follow:

– Seek immediate medical attention: Attending physicians will provide appropriate treatments and compile necessary reports detailing your injuries.

– Document all incidents leading up to and including the attack: Your recollection might fade over time hence documentation aids refreshing such memories.

– Report incident to animal control authorities: Public records of previous attacks may argue against an owner who claims ignorance of their pets violent behavior.

– Engage qualified legal representation: A competent lawyer can assist you in pursuing fair monetary recompense.

Being a victim caught up in a traumatic incident might leave you beat—and undoubtedly asking what kind of compensation you could potentially receive. In answer—past medical bills accrued from treating your wounds must be considered first. Estimated future costs related to potential surgeries or therapies depending on the severity of your injuries would also play into it as well RAW_EOS Future lost income from time taken off work during recovery phases features too. Pain and suffering endured due to physical lessening—from scarring or disability—as well as emotional distress from the ordeal are compensable.

At Carlson Bier, we understand that every dog bite case is unique. For this very reason, our approach is tailored to fit the specific circumstances of your situation. Our seasoned lawyers meticulously build a strong case on your behalf using comprehensive investigative tools and tried-and-tested legal strategies. We make it our mission to ensure that you receive fair compensation for your injuries, pain and suffering resultant from dog bite incidents.

Moreover, remember—time plays a critical role. The Illinois statute of limitations usually grants 2 years from date of incident to file a lawsuit claiming personal injury caused by a dog bite under most situations—which can only be extended under exceptional circumstances (like minor victims). It is imperative you action early to avoid missing out upon the opportunity to claim justice due.

Lastly—with such an intricate legal path to navigate through—it’s easy feeling overwhelmed. Yet at Carlson Bier we strive for seamless processes providing convenience through state-of-art digital interfaces. You’re just one click away from finding out how much your case might potentially be worth—no strings attached! Tap into our experience and let us help guide you through these choppy seas towards safe harbors—with nothing more than simply clicking on button below… Your journey towards regaining control over life post-incident begins here—at Carlson Bier Advocates with commitment making sure justice being served in every corner of Illinois—without any unsubstantiated location claims contravening law impediments.

‍

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Gilman Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Gilman

Areas of Practice in Gilman

Bicycle Crashes

Specializing in legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' negligence or risky conditions.

Scald Damages

Extending adept legal services for victims of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Clinical Incompetence

Ensuring specialist legal advice for individuals affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Responsibility

Managing cases involving unsafe products, providing professional legal support to consumers affected by harmful products.

Senior Misconduct

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Tumble and Fall Accidents

Skilled in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking recovery for their suffering.

Childbirth Wounds

Delivering legal help for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Crashes: Concentrated on supporting victims of car accidents obtain fair payout for harms and destruction.

Motorcycle Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

18-Wheeler Accident

Extending specialist legal advice for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for damages.

Construction Collisions

Dedicated to advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Neurological Injuries

Expert in offering professional legal advice for individuals suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Damages

Adept at managing cases for clients who have suffered harms from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Specializing in legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Unjust Death

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and expert legal guidance to ensure redress.

Backbone Impairment

Dedicated to advocating for clients with paralysis, offering dedicated legal representation to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​