Medical Malpractice Attorney in Gilman

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When facing a medical malpractice situation, choosing an advocate who is skillful, relentless and compassionate becomes paramount. Carlson Bier holds these attributes at the core of their principles. In your most valuable fight for justice in Gilman, entrust your case to our legal team whose uppermost goal revolves around fighting vigorously for victims of medical negligence. Our distinguished understanding of Illinois law allows us to navigate intricacies with competency equipping you with a robust strategy aimed at obtaining rightful compensation for damages sustained owing to negligent healthcare practitioners. Leverage our deep-seated knowledge, proven efficacy derived from countless successful settlements and immense vigor poured into each case we undertake. At Carlson Bier, we firmly believe that accurate representation by skilled attorneys plays an integral role while dealing against powerful entities in the complex domain of Medical Malpractice law; hence our unflinching commitment lies with serving nothing short of excellence personalized according to every client’s distinct requirement within the boundaries set by legal ethics and compliance protocols specified under Illinois jurisdiction.

About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Gilman Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our firm stands as one of the preeminent personal injury law groups in Illinois – with a distinctive focus on Medical Malpractice cases. Our dedicated team of practiced attorneys is deeply familiarized with the complexities that surround these case types and are committed to leveraging their breadth of legal acumen to secure justice and rightful compensation for affected individuals.

Medical malpractice can occur when a doctor, nurse, or another healthcare professional fails to provide care that aligns with accepted standards within the medical community leading to patient harm or death. In this instance, it becomes crucial for victims to understand their rights and learn how best they can seek redressal.

To define key characteristics integral in determining medical malpractice claims: Firstly, there must be evidence of an established doctor-patient relationship where the physician owed a duty of care toward you. The second characteristic relates to negligence by said health professional who failed to meet requisite medical standards causing your injury. Thirdly – causation; substantiating that the established negligence was directly responsible for your ailment or aggravating it further, resulting in your suffering.

Apart from these essentials attributes, other consequential factors contribute significantly:

– Injury severity: More severe injuries tend could lead to larger settlement amounts.

– Medical costs incurred: Your claim will need to encompass both current medicinal outlays as well future healthcare expenses anticipated because of the injury.

– Lost wages: Any loss of income owing to inability to perform routine tasks during recovery should also factor into your claim.

All states also have specific “statute of limitations” laws which mandate certain timelines within which any legal action related to malpractice needs commencing. In Illinois particularly, forthrightness about a two year filing requirement post identifying potential negligence exists; failing which could possibly quash any prospects of due restitution.

Proceeding without skilled legal counsel while grappling through these substantial aspects isn’t advisable given intricate judicial procedures coupled with formidable insurers often awaiting on the other side. Choosing Carlson Bier provides you with experienced, steadfast legal representation with a demonstrable track record in litigating and winning medical malpractice cases. Our staff will persistently work along-side you gathering essential evidences, consulting external medical experts wherever necessary and tirelessly advocating for your rights in court; ensuring every detail is meticulously taken care of.

We uphold utmost sincerity toward our obligation as “attorneys to the injured”. We aren’t simply concentrated on pursuing monetary compensations but rather also aspire towards effecting change within healthcare systems thereby reducing future instances of patient harm.

Finally, it’s important to clarify that while we’re committed to serving clients all across Illinois, it is legally impermissible for us to proclaim an office presence where none exists truly – such as declaring ourselves ‘personal lawyers located in Gilman’. However should you be resident there or anywhere else within the state confines; rest assured, proficient support from Carlson Bier will always remain just one phone call away.

As every case presents distinct nuances making accurate calculations of settlement amounts challenging without complete information; please don’t hesitate clicking the button below if we’ve piqued your curiosity about how much your claim could potentially fetch. You owe it to yourselves – allow accomplished Carlson Bier attorneys assist in navigating you past initial uncertainties toward recognizing your rightful worth.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Gilman Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Gilman

Areas of Practice in Gilman

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Proficient in legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Fire Wounds

Offering skilled legal advice for victims of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Hospital Malpractice

Offering professional legal advice for patients affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Products Obligation

Taking on cases involving defective products, supplying skilled legal guidance to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip & Tumble Mishaps

Specialist in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to persons seeking justice for their harm.

Newborn Harms

Extending legal help for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Accidents: Devoted to guiding patients of car accidents get reasonable settlement for harms and destruction.

Motorbike Mishaps

Expert in providing legal advice for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

Trucking Mishap

Delivering experienced legal representation for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for injuries.

Construction Mishaps

Engaged in representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Cerebral Injuries

Expert in providing specialized legal advice for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Injuries

Proficient in handling cases for persons who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Jogger Accidents

Focused on legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Unfair Passing

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and professional legal assistance to ensure redress.

Spine Impairment

Focused on advocating for patients with backbone trauma, offering expert legal guidance to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer