FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Gilman

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Navigating the aftermath of spinal cord injuries can be daunting, making it critical to seek efficient and empathetic legal representation. In this challenging journey, consider partnering with Carlson Bier – a highly regarded personal injury law firm known for its exceptional handling of Spinal Cord Injury cases throughout Illinois. Proudly serving in Gilman, our team is unparalleled when it comes to pursuing justice for sufferers of these devastating injuries. We endeavor to ensure that our clients’ rights are protected at every phase of their case while consistently seeking optimum compensation possible under Illinois law. Our vast experience coupled with expert knowledge sets us apart as leaders in the intricate field of spinal cord injury litigation. Committed and compassionate, we offer personalized attention tailored uniquely to each client’s specific situation ensuring thorough understanding and strategized action towards resolution seeks significance beyond measure. Choose Carlson Bier; entrust your path forward into capable hands equipped with professionalism grounded by genuine concern about your story indeed makes us a valuable consideration as you navigate through these difficulties in Gilman and across Illinois.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Gilman Illinois

Understanding spinal cord injuries and navigating the associated legal complexities is a considerable challenge. However, at Carlson Bier, our expertise as personal injury attorneys allows us to provide comprehensive guidance during this difficult period. A spinal cord injury is any type of impairment or damage inflicted on the spinal cord, which can lead to muscle weakness, diminished coordination or even complete paralysis. This crippling ailment predominantly results from catastrophic accidents such as vehicular collisions, falls or sports-related injuries.

Your understanding of spinal cord injuries is instrumental in shedding light on your prospects for pertinent compensation and securing justice for your case. The level of paralysis decides not only the duration of rehabilitation and recovery but also impacts loss of income, hindering career progression and straining relationships-building resilience becomes arduous without financial support.

Let’s unpack common incidences leading to Spinal Cord Injuries:

– Motor Vehicle Accidents: Among all causes, motor vehicle incidents have been identified as responsible for almost half (46%) of reported cases.

– Falls: Particularly among adults over the age of 65 years old, falls count for roughly one-third (31%) of cases.

– Violence: A surprising addition to this list – including gunshots – constitute up to 13% of SCI occurrences.

– Sports Incidences: About 9% are linked with athletic activities; impact sports being a key contributor.

In Illinois State law suits related specifically to spinal cord injuries may fall under premises liability laws or auto accident claims depending upon where you were injured—a topic more thoroughly understood by seasoned professionals like Carlson Bier attorneys who handle these complex considerations daily with adept proficiency.

Our goal at Carlson Bier is not just representation—it’s about building strong probabilities towards winning justice based on documented evidences highlighting negligence that led directly to spinal cord injuries resulting in life-altering conditions affecting quality of life indefinitely.

But why choose us? What sets Carlson Bier apart?

Our difference lies in holistic examination coupled with tenacious representation; ensuring the heavy medical expenses are defrayed, reduced income is compensated for, and accident-related distress is acknowledged in a court of law. We pride ourselves on meticulous case handling that leaves no room for compromise on rights or monetary compensation.

Our Strengths:

– Track Record: Consistent legal victories across Illinois both inside and outside courts.

– Deep Understanding: Thorough familiarization with spinal cord injury regulations & claims.

– Dedicated Teams: Attorneys who relentlessly work towards fair compensation to alleviate financial strains resulting from SCI injuries.

It’s important to remember our services don’t terminate at courtroom doors—we stand steadfast alongside each client through intense emotional whirlwinds—a promise manifest both in words and actions as a leading personal injury lawyer firm—Carlson Bier.

Given the persistent progress of medical science, it’s justified to maintain hope about your future post-spinal cord injury—getting you there however requires tenacity coupled with expert legal guidance. It’s natural to feel overwhelmed during these challenging times—our role at Carlson Bier revolves around lessening those burdens energetically while protecting your lawful rights obsessively. To understand your claim avenues better, we encourage you to connect directly with us via the button below. Explore what your spinal cord injury case could potentially be worth by seeking counsel immediately– because credible advice matters when stakes are high. After all, it’s not just about reclaiming control—it’s regaining life quality too—with Carlson Bier attorneys staunchly defending every step of your journey towards justice.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Gilman Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Gilman

Areas of Practice in Gilman

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Focused on legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or perilous conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Providing professional legal advice for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Medical Negligence

Offering experienced legal services for persons affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Liability

Managing cases involving faulty products, delivering skilled legal guidance to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Mistreatment

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble & Tumble Occurrences

Adept in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking compensation for their damages.

Birth Wounds

Offering legal guidance for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Car Collisions

Incidents: Concentrated on aiding individuals of car accidents receive just settlement for injuries and damages.

Motorbike Accidents

Expert in providing legal advice for individuals involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Trucking Collision

Extending professional legal services for drivers involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for injuries.

Worksite Crashes

Concentrated on assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or recklessness.

Head Damages

Committed to extending dedicated legal support for victims suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Traumas

Specialized in handling cases for clients who have suffered harms from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Incidents

Specializing in legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Loss

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and experienced legal support to ensure justice.

Neural Impairment

Focused on assisting victims with spine impairments, offering expert legal assistance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​