Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Girard

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the unfortunate circumstance of a pedestrian accident in Girard, consider entrusting your case to the accomplished legal group at Carlson Bier. Our dedicated team possesses broad expertise and an exemplary record in ensuring diligent representation for those affected by such accidents. Eliminating stressful complexities is at the forefront of our service, simplifying legal procedures while fighting tirelessly for maximum compensation. Understanding that each occurrence is unique, our meticulous investigation methods ensure all aspects are carefully examined before formulating robust strategies solidly grounded in Illinois law. Each client receives individual attention from our compassionate professionals who believe justice should be accessible to all irrespective of personal circumstances. With experience that spans several decades, we offer guidance through every stage of litigation process generating peace of mind during tough times. Trust us; as successfully demonstrated time and again: Carlson Bier stands beside you as more than just a law firm – but as relentless advocates committed to seeking justice on behalf your utmost interests when dealing with pedestrian accidents.

About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Girard Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury law with a keen focus on Pedestrian Accidents. As an established Illinois-based law firm, our experienced attorneys understand the nuances of pedestrian accidents and how they affect you as a victim. Our priority is ensuring that your rights are adequately defended while you receive just compensation for any losses incurred.

As your dedicated legal allies, we recognize that each case is unique and holds specific complexities. By taking time to comprehensively analyze every aspect of your predicament, we can strategically position ourselves to help attain a positive outcome. Carlson Bier relentlessly pursues justice for victims and their families who have been unduly harmed due to negligent acts leading to pedestrian accidents.

To better understand the scope of pedestrian accident cases:

• Most reported pedestrian accidents arise from driver errors such as speeding or distraction.

• In certain scenarios, poorly designed traffic control mechanisms can contribute to collisions.

• Not all incidents resulting in harm get reported; thus the real toll could be higher than represented statistically.

How do we assure you’re fairly compensated?

• Comprehensive investigation: Detecting culpabilities requires thorough fact-finding procedures which include obtaining police reports, witness statements, accruing photographic evidence among others.

• Medical analysis: Injury evaluation paints a clear picture of the physical consequences and impacts on your overall health undergone after an accident.

• Economic damage assessment: We include loss of earnings (present & future), medical bill expenses incurred during treatment, costs related to future healthcare needs and other out-of-pocket expenses.

Like ripples spreading out when a stone is thrown into water – pedestrian accidents too have far-reaching effects. The aftermath not only includes financial strain but also emotional stress exerted on victims and their immediate family members. At Carlson Bier Law Firm – our mission is intertwined with compassion for nurturing your recovery along with resolute dedication towards retrieving what has been unjustly taken away from you.

It must be noted that being killed or injured as a pedestrian often goes beyond physical harm, it also affects your mental and emotional health. This consequence can further strain relationships and lead to other personal issues such as loss of income, inability to work or even increased medical expenses. Our team at Carlson Bier stands ready to help you navigate these challenging times.

Our experienced attorneys both understand and empathize with our clients in their time of need. Therefore, we are motivated by the drive to secure justice on your behalf while ensuring that every detail related to your case is meticulously examined and addressed. We believe that ensuring effective communication is imperative for better understanding thus building trust between us – therefore we assure you consistent updates concerning advancements on your case.

These accidents unfortunately occur all too often. What sets us apart? At Carlson Bier, adhering to rigid ethical standards combined with passion-driven lawyers working intensively behind each case enables us to uphold superior representation amongst our peers within the Illinois jurisdiction.

Choosing legal aid should not be another stressor following an accident; rather it should provide relief knowing that someone knowledgeable, adept and compassionate is arguing for you – procuring the best possible outcome for your situation – this is what choosing Carlson Bier means.

We’re steadfast proponents for pedestrian rights: everyone deserves fair treatment regardless of circumstances leading up to an unfortunate event. Irrespective whether you have been hit by a car or were involved in any form of collision as a pedestrian; this fight isn’t yours alone- at Carlson Bier we’re here standing beside you till the end.

Therefore, feel free take the first step towards securing justice owed by clicking on the button below— discover how much compensation might be due based on specific details concerning your unique situation. Our devoted legal professionals are eager to ensure victims like you receive fair reimbursement for injuries endured- why wait? Allow us make life return almost back-to-normalcy by extending unrivaled legal services from Carlson Bier Attorneys today.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Girard Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Girard

Areas of Practice in Girard

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Proficient in legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Burn Burns

Extending specialist legal support for victims of intense burn injuries caused by accidents or carelessness.

Physician Misconduct

Ensuring specialist legal advice for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Goods Obligation

Handling cases involving faulty products, delivering specialist legal help to clients affected by defective items.

Elder Neglect

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring justice.

Stumble & Fall Occurrences

Specialist in dealing with trip accident cases, providing legal support to victims seeking recovery for their injuries.

Infant Injuries

Extending legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Collisions

Incidents: Concentrated on aiding patients of car accidents obtain equitable compensation for wounds and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Dedicated to providing legal services for riders involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Truck Accident

Ensuring specialist legal support for persons involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for losses.

Building Site Incidents

Concentrated on assisting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Harms

Focused on extending professional legal representation for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Wounds

Specialized in addressing cases for clients who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Collisions

Focused on legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unfair Fatality

Working for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and experienced legal services to ensure restitution.

Backbone Injury

Expert in supporting patients with paralysis, offering expert legal support to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer