...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Glasford

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with dog bite injuries, you want to partner with the best; that’s where Carlson Bier steps in. Our dedicated team of expert attorneys excels at handling complex personal injury claims, specifically specializing in dog bite cases. We understand how traumatic these situations can be and aim to secure fair compensation for our clients while making the legal process as smooth as possible. Serving the greater Glasford area, Carlson Bier is equipped with a deep understanding of Illinois statutes pertaining to dog bites and utilizes this knowledge effectively during each case we undertake. Our exceptional track record comes from meticulous attention to detail coupled with relentless advocacy for our clients’ rights. What truly sets us apart though is our unwavering commitment towards your cause – at Carlson Bier, no stone goes unturned when it comes to fighting for your justice. For professional expertise plus compassionate service through a challenging journey – trust only Carlson Bier lawyers – experts on Dog Bite Injuries related laws in Illinois.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Glasford Illinois

As a top-tier law firm in Illinois, Carlson Bier specializes in an extensive range of personal injury cases, among which dog bite injuries hold substantial prominence. With an incisive understanding of the complexities often associated with dog bite cases, we are committed to offering high-quality legal aid intended to yield favorable outcomes for our clients.

A dog bite can precipitate far more than just physical harm. It can potentially lead to severe emotional distress as well as significant financial tolls resulting from medical expenses and loss of income during recovery. Understanding these implications makes us proficiently versed in providing advice and representation necessary for attaining fair compensation.

* Dog Bite Injuries: Any interaction with dogs carries the risk of unexpected aggression leading to injurious bites or attacks.

* Legal Rights: As per Illinois laws, victims have rights to seek compensation if they suffer injuries due to a dog owner’s negligence.

* The Compensation Process: Depending on the severity and circumstances surrounding your case, damages awarded may cover medical bills, rehabilitation costs, lost wages, pain and suffering.

At Carlson Bier, we believe that comprehensive knowledge about the subject is crucial for all involved parties. Weeding out common misconceptions associated with this category of personal injury claims is vital for clarity around legal recourse options following a dog bite incident.

Firstly, it’s essential to dispel any myths surrounding breed-specific legislations —Illinois doesn’t carry any blanket restrictions regarding specific breeds considered inherently dangerous. Every case investigated depends on individual circumstances rather than generalized preconceptions about distinct breeds making informed decisions imperative.

Secondly, despite popular belief about provoked attacks being unaccounted within legal purview— you might still be eligible for compensation depending upon whether the act was unintentional or intentional provocation. This emphasizes why expert legal counsel can be invaluable for nuanced interpretation of such factors influencing your particular case outcome.

Finally, when it comes to proving liability under Illinois’ strict liability statute (510 ILCS 5/16), it necessitates precise legal understanding to establish the dog owner’s liability. Carlson Bier’s expert team of personal injury lawyers are adept at navigating this legal landscape, providing effective representation for our clients.

We also reckon it is crucial to understand the Illinois statute of limitations applicable to dog bite cases. In general, you must file a lawsuit within two years from the date of your injury—an important deadline that we ardently recognize and work with diligence and urgency within these constraints.

With an abundance of practical experience under our belts, Carlson Bier stands by its commitment to personified care and tailored strategies for every client who turns to us in their time of need. Our agile approach ensures all avenues are meticulously explored, thereby elevating chances for the best possible compensation outcomes.

Whether dealing with insurance companies or court proceedings, rest assured that our robust guidance will not only comfort but lend confidence through each step. We understand every detail matters, from documenting medical visits post-incident thoroughly to preserving evidence such as torn clothing or photographs which can significantly influence the direction your case takes.

Navigating through a personal injury lawsuit might seem daunting on your own; however, knowledgeable allies like us stand by your side. At Carlson Bier, we embody dedication—our committed attorney group working hard towards ensuring justice served accurately reflects what you deserve while making this journey less challenging for you.

Crucially though: if there has been any physical harm resulting from a dog bite incident—medical attention should be immediate top priority—even before reaching out for legal assistance since some injuries could take time to manifest into noticeable symptoms.

Are you grappling with sustaining a dog bite injury due to someone else’s negligence? Don’t shoulder this burden alone! Allow us at Carlson Bier—the leading personal injury attorneys—to fight relentlessly on your behalf towards achieving rightful compensation!

Curious about how much your case might be worth? Click on the button below—we look forward to helping you secure the most favorable restitution available within your legal rights as an Illinois citizen.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Glasford Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Glasford

Areas of Practice in Glasford

Cycling Crashes

Expert in legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Flame Wounds

Extending skilled legal services for people of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Healthcare Negligence

Offering professional legal support for patients affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Fault

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, providing professional legal support to customers affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Mistreatment

Defending the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring justice.

Trip and Tumble Accidents

Professional in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking restitution for their suffering.

Birth Wounds

Extending legal help for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Vehicle Crashes

Incidents: Committed to helping victims of car accidents get appropriate compensation for harms and damages.

Bike Mishaps

Expert in providing legal advice for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Trucking Mishap

Offering specialist legal advice for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recovery for hurts.

Construction Crashes

Concentrated on advocating for workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Brain Impairments

Dedicated to ensuring dedicated legal assistance for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Injuries

Expertise in dealing with cases for persons who have suffered traumas from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Dedicated to legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Unjust Death

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and expert legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Neural Injury

Specializing in representing victims with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal support to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​