FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Glasford

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a spinal cord injury can inflict tremendous physical, emotional, and financial toll. During such times, having the trusted guidance of specialists in Spinal Cord injuries lawsuit becomes essential. Carlson Bier emerges as your dependable choice for this complex legal path ahead. With an extensive practice and professional footprint across Illinois including Glasford; our firm has mastered the intricacies surrounding such devastating cases over years of diligent practice – providing exceptional service to those who need it most. Navigating through medical records or handling insurance claim denials? We clarify these stumbling blocks with ease while creating robust case strategies that yield maximum compensation for you.

The reputation we carry today rests on values embedded deeply within us: empathy towards clients involving personal tragedies like spinal cord injuries; expertise cutting through medical jargons and courtroom novelty; integrity standing steadfast amidst any trial’s onslaughts – all enveloped under a commitment to serve justice above all else.

Choose Carlson Bier: Your resilient advocate in your pursuit against Spinal Cord Injuries litigation roadblocks.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Glasford Illinois

Specializing in personal injury law, Carlson Bier is an Illinois-based legal firm that stands as a beacon of justice for the victims of unfortunate incidents. Our seasoned attorneys have a broad spectrum of expertise in many dimensions, among which lies our specialized knowledge concerning spinal cord injuries; an often life-altering event posing significant challenges to individuals and their families.

Spinal cord injuries typically occur When there’s damage to any part of the spinal cord or nerves at the end of the spinal canal — a tragic incident capable of permanently altering strength, sensation and function below the site of injury. When faced with such adversity, it becomes pivotal to understand your rights so you may claim deserved compensation— this is where Carlson Bier steps in.

Let’s delve into understanding more about what comprises a Spinal Cord Injury:

– Initial Trauma: This primarily includes falls, sports injuries, car accidents, or acts involving violence. Any considerable force exerted onto the spine can inflict immediate trauma.

– Secondary Injury: Over time – potentially days or weeks after initial damage – secondary complications can emerge. These include swelling, inflammation, fluid accumulation and additional neurological issues.

The legal framework surrounding these injuries presents numerous nuances demanding precision interpretation. At Carlson Bier we take pride in providing comprehensive guidance across varying complexities linked to seeking restitution and gaining appropriate access to medical care following spinal cord injuries.

Importantly:

– Establishing Liability: A fundamental step revolves around proving another entity was responsible due to negligence or intentionally harmful action causing your spinal cord injury.

– Understanding Damages: This refers not only to current medical bills but also future expenses stemming from ongoing treatments, loss of earning capacity, permanent impairment/disability aspects along with non-economic damages like pain and suffering.

Aggressively advocating for your rightful compensation requires intricate understanding gleaned over years working within internal mechanisms punctuating legalese taxonomy coupled with realistic empathy towards life altering circumstances resulting from such misfortunes. Carlson Bier stands firm in the face of these challenges: meticulously deciphering legal language, discerning avenues for client advantage, and maximizing recovery rights.

At Carlson Bier we offer a representative support team that acquaints itself dedicatedly with medical practices concerning spinal cord treatment along with necessary therapy and rehabilitation components. The central aim being to ascertain the increased lifetime costs associated as a result. Post this delivery of vast knowledge regarding potential economic impacts under varying scenarios; it eases our clients’ journey through tedious legal proceedings, while ensuring their pursuits are orchestrated optimally in concordance with Illinois law.

In reckoning with something as catastrophic as Spinal Cord Injuries, remember you are not alone. With careful navigation managed on your behalf by skilled attorneys at Carlson Bier – possessing extensive comprehension regarding paths to successful restitution – hope is more than a distant glimmer over an uphill climb.

Take charge today! It’s essential to promptly bring litigation against liable parties thereby securing full compensation which encompasses all facets of expenses implicated due to the injury whilst safeguarding one’s future needs too. Click on the button below and allow us to help determine if you may be entitled to financial benefits following such unfortunate experiences. Place your trust in our experienced hands and let us affirm how much your case truly holds worth – because at Carlson Bier, we believe everyone deserves justice.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Glasford Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Glasford

Areas of Practice in Glasford

Bike Crashes

Expert in legal support for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Scald Damages

Providing expert legal services for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Hospital Misconduct

Delivering specialist legal advice for patients affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Liability

Taking on cases involving problematic products, supplying adept legal help to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Mistreatment

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Trip and Tumble Occurrences

Skilled in handling trip accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking restitution for their injuries.

Birth Injuries

Extending legal assistance for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Accidents: Focused on supporting patients of car accidents obtain fair recompense for damages and harm.

Bike Mishaps

Specializing in providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for damages.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Delivering professional legal services for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful claims for injuries.

Construction Site Collisions

Engaged in advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or recklessness.

Cerebral Harms

Committed to ensuring compassionate legal assistance for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Injuries

Skilled in addressing cases for clients who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Crashes

Dedicated to legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Demise

Working for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and professional legal support to ensure compensation.

Backbone Harm

Specializing in assisting victims with paralysis, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​