Bicycle Accidents in Glen Ellyn

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Navigating through the aftermath of a bicycle accident can be a challenging process, ensuring your rights are upheld and obtain the compensation you deserve is critical. Trust Carlson Bier to guide you on this complex legal path. Renowned for our wealth of knowledge in personal injury law, specifically related to bicycle accidents, we vigorously advocate for victims based throughout Illinois including Glen Ellyn. It’s imperative to have proficient representation when dealing with such unique cases – expertise only found at firms like us: experienced and driven advocates who understand every nuance of these specific lawsuits while striving relentlessly for clients’ justice. Our professionally tailored approach has delivered exceptional results time after time because we comprehend that each case carries its own complexity which necessitates an individualistic strategy. In pursuit of maximum settlement or verdicts for our esteemed clients, Carlson Bier assures detailed attention to all aspects surrounding a bicycle accident claim; making us the most prudent choice in handling your case effectively.

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Glen Ellyn Illinois

Navigating the aftermath of a bicycle accident can be overwhelming, emotionally exhausting and fraught with legal complexities. You may be facing mounting medical bills, loss of income due to injuries preventing work or even dealing with life-altering changes after serious accidents. At Carlson Bier, an Illinois-based personal injury law firm, we understand these challenges firsthand.

Experienced in tackling cases involving bicycle accidents, we advocate zealously for our clients’ rights, ensuring they are adequately compensated for their suffering and losses. Bicycle accident-related cases require specialized knowledge on how these unique situations apply within the realm of personal injury law; at Carlson Bier, we possess such in-depth understanding born out of our practical expertise that spans over years.

When it comes to bicycle accidents several key factors need consideration:

– Identifying responsible parties: This could include motorists who failed to yield right-of-way, city agencies accountable due to poor road conditions or defective bicycle manufacturers.

– Understanding intricate biking rules: Local ordinances often have specific bicycling laws which greatly affect liability issues.

– Evoking The ‘Comparative Negligence’ clause: In some cases where cyclists might have partially contributed to their own accident – still cyclist has a substantive claim since Illinois follows the comparative negligence rule.

– Proving damages effectively: Crucial for attaining maximum compensation.

Our commitment at Carlson Bier goes beyond merely fighting for financial settlements; it’s about restoring lives disrupted by these unfortunate incidents.

We sketch case strategies tailored around individual circumstances. Each bike accident is unique in terms of specifics – different parties involved varying degrees of fault and injuries suffered – everything matters when formulating an effective strategy. Our meticulous approach ensures thorough investigation securing critical evidence (like police reports etc.), engaging experts (accident reconstructionists etc), compassionate guidance during negotiations & trials – all aimed towards safeguarding your best interests always.

By choosing Carlson Bier as your representative you’re availing critical insights withholding vast experience in handling serious cycling crash cases including hit-and-run incidents, door collisions, right-turn & left-turn accidents to name a few. We strive for results matter sparing absolutely no efforts in our pursuit towards securing justice on your behalf.

We understand the physical, psychological and financial toll an accident imposes upon you. Therefore apart from assuring vigorous representation we also provide emotional support helping allay fears pertaining to reclaiming life post-injury.

Working under a contingency fee structure implies – we only get paid once there’s settlement or judgement in favor of our client; this ensures minimum financial burden safeguarding your best interests always.

Visibility is key when dealing with personal injury claims; hence Carlson Bier offers regular case status updates keeping clients informed about developments at every stage making sure they are part of the decision-making process always feeling valued and heard.

We campaign not just as attorneys but as protectors of rights – fighting tooth and nail ensuring victims’ voices never go unheard whilst claiming rightful compensation aiding healing processes restoring normalcy back into lives overrun by such unfortunate circumstances.

Allow us to assess your claim today – find out what options lay before you how much could be potentially entitled too after evaluating specifics surrounding your bike accident incident. Click on the button below let our experienced lawyers explore potential merits representing your bicycle accident claim validating how much worth embodies within presenting such a legal suit today rediscovering possibilities towards brighter tomorrow’s.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Glen Ellyn Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Glen Ellyn

Areas of Practice in Glen Ellyn

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Proficient in legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or risky conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Giving adept legal help for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or indifference.

Clinical Misconduct

Ensuring experienced legal assistance for persons affected by healthcare malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Accountability

Addressing cases involving defective products, supplying professional legal support to individuals affected by defective items.

Senior Abuse

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip and Trip Mishaps

Expert in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking compensation for their harm.

Newborn Traumas

Providing legal assistance for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Collisions

Mishaps: Committed to helping individuals of car accidents gain reasonable recompense for damages and damages.

Motorcycle Crashes

Specializing in providing legal support for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Truck Accident

Offering adept legal assistance for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate recompense for losses.

Worksite Incidents

Committed to representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Cerebral Impairments

Specializing in extending professional legal services for persons suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Traumas

Skilled in addressing cases for people who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Collisions

Expert in legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Demise

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and experienced legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Neural Damage

Focused on supporting persons with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal services to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer