FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Glen Ellyn

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Experiencing a pedestrian accident can be detrimental, physically and emotionally. Choosing an attorney to fiercely advocate on your behalf is essential. With vast experience safeguarding the rights of victims against insurance companies, Carlson Bier emerges as a prudent choice for skilled representation in Glen Ellyn-related cases. Our dedicated team diligently compiles evidence and identifies liable parties to ensure our clients receive fair compensation for their injuries and lost wages; adding an edge to each case we handle with our comprehensive understanding of Illinois law governing pedestrian accidents. We thoughtfully tailor legal strategies holistically addressing each client’s unique circumstances — never shying away from litigation when necessary. Moreover, we offer no-fee consultations that not only allow us to understand your case’s specifics but also provides you an opportunity to fathom the kind preparing needed thereafter without any cost burden upfront! A seamless blend of expertise, dedication, empathy— Carlson Bier stands not just professionally aligned but genuinely vested in every claimant’s best interest at heart during such strenuous times.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Glen Ellyn Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are seasoned personal injury attorneys dedicated to representing and seeking justice for victims of pedestrian accidents in Illinois. Personal injuries arising from pedestrian accidents can be devastating, occasionally leading to permanent disability or life-altering circumstances that disrupt productivity and quality of life. The Carlson Bier team is committed to providing aggressive legal representation tailored towards securing the maximum compensation pertaining to your case.

Pedestrian accidents aren’t mere happenstance, as they surreptitiously manifest through numerous forms. One primary cause revolves around driver negligence where individuals operating vehicles under the influence, distracted driving, breaching speed limits or disregarding weather conditions precipitate catastrophic occurrences with pedestrians. Equally important are situations involving malfunctioning traffic signal crossings and poorly maintained roads leading to dangerous sidewalk incidents.

Being abreast of Illinois law surrounding pedestrian accidents is crucial to navigating these traumatic instances. Statutorily defined rights exist that require drivers to stop for pedestrians at crosswalks—whether marked or unmarked—and at intersections when walk signals display appropriately; this regulatory obligation doesn’t absolve the need for caution by pedestrians too however.

Remember these key points:

– Pedestrians have the right of way at crosswalks.

– Motorists must yield when turning at a green light or making a turn after stopping at a red light.

– They must also yield if the close proximity of their vehicles may constitute an imminent hazard

– It becomes illegal if two lanes don’t separate oncoming cars while passing stationary vehicles stopped for pedestrians

Understanding causative factors like high-speed factor trends within residential zones affecting walking areas such as school zones could aid prevention strategies design.

Having expert legal advice in times of pedestrian-related incidents could not be overstated given potential complication possibilities inherent in litigation navigation process. While insurance companies might appear empathetic following your ordeal, they unsurprisingly prioritize their interests predominantly; often deploying counterproductive techniques aimed towards reduced liability confession thus hindering deserved-respite realization during recovery periods.

Our role at Carlson Bier is to traverse this treacherous legal landscape expertly, aided by a time-tested collective depth of experience within the personal injury law circle; perpetually protecting your interests ensuring indemnity delivery commensurate with extent suffered losses. Our agile representation spans diverse case types even included those plagued with liability questions.

We efficiently handle intricate details like acquiring comprehensive medical reports, interviewing eyewitnesses, engaging accident reconstruction specialists where appropriate, and zealously arguing your cause before relevant judicial authorities. Our objective remains securing due compensation for incurred damages – encompassing loss-of-income, distress (and accompanying emotional anguish), medical expense alongside rehab therapy costs continuity foresight viability implication route.

Your engagement with the Carlson Bier team wouldn’t attract initial outlay consideration courtesy our contingency-based fee system strategy that only bills retrospectively upon successful financial restitution accomplishment on your behalf—a testament of quintessential advocacy belief inherent in our firm’s operational doctrine.

In succinct terms, imagine having allies in the cumbersome quest for justice following harrowing pedestrian accidents corridor navigation—guides familiarized with personal intricacies litigation process demands envisaged within Illinois jurisdiction constraints and opportunities. That’s precisely what you can expect when choosing Carlson Bier as trusted companion custodians within these difficult times.

Time limitation factors known as statute of limitations affects viable claim initiation countenance rightly exists necessitating speedy action orientation essential towards realistic redress ample window timeframe expiration damping we would be thrilled play proactive role defined timely correspondence trigger fast-action responses unfolding merits upheld always sets paramount success appetite catering desirable outcomes reach for clients irrespective incident circumstances boundaries scaling responsibility restitution tasks judiciously stewarded by us they rightfully deserve haunt-free equilibrium realization pursuits follow traumatic unintended catastrophe encounter episodes

Embrace restorative justice potentialities disgorged amidst chaotic interpersonal upheavals anchored onto disillusionment triggers derivative negligent counterparts behavior matrix formula removed far neglect valuation tropospheric evaluation resonance growth—for every resilient stride ascends corrective action orientation towards proactivity claim mandate proactive exert leadership value verticals incrementation step bolster recovery journey event horizon span increasing litigative intervention effectiveness instrumentality goal representational pursuit channels homegrown envisioning resolution prosecution centrality actor proposition theorem Carlson Bier legal instrument spectrum potential misery beacon representation crossroads pendulum.

Embrace the energy of resilience and let’s work together to get you back on your feet. Click on the button below now to find out how much your case is worth! At Carlson Bier, our priority is you.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Glen Ellyn Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Glen Ellyn

Areas of Practice in Glen Ellyn

Bicycle Incidents

Expert in legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Burn Wounds

Giving skilled legal assistance for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Clinical Negligence

Extending professional legal representation for individuals affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Liability

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, delivering specialist legal guidance to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Misconduct

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring justice.

Fall and Slip Mishaps

Expert in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking compensation for their damages.

Newborn Harms

Extending legal aid for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Car Collisions

Collisions: Committed to aiding clients of car accidents secure reasonable remuneration for hurts and harm.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Specializing in providing legal advice for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for damages.

Big Rig Incident

Offering specialist legal services for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful compensation for losses.

Construction Site Crashes

Engaged in representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Neurological Impairments

Specializing in ensuring expert legal representation for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Damages

Expertise in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Focused on legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unjust Demise

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and experienced legal services to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Injury

Specializing in supporting clients with paralysis, offering compassionate legal representation to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440