Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in Glenview

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When facing the aftermath of a slip and fall accident, you need an accomplished lawyer by your side. Carlson Bier – Personal Injury Lawyers in Illinois are experienced in dealing with such cases effectively. Our dedicated team excels at securing fair settlements for our clients who have sustained injuries due to hazards like wet floors, ice patches, or poorly lit pathways. Not only do we empathize with your predicament but also ensure that justice is duly served. Choosing Carlson Bier means benefiting from the combined wisdom of seasoned veterans in handling slip and falls accidents related lawsuits proficiently who aim to maximize compensation value relevant to medical bills, lost wages and other associated costs. We are committed towards one purpose: championing your rights against negligent parties causing these avoidable mishaps! Do not let a slip and fall injury agonize you further; get the expert advice from Carlson Bier attorneys today- they combine experience driven strategy with effective client communication producing enduring results that go beyond recovery!

About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in Glenview Illinois

As a leading Illinois-based law firm, Carlson Bier specializes in personal injury cases and has an outstanding proven track record for getting results. Alongside our varied services, we have carved out a niche in handling Slip and Fall Accidents – a common form of personal injury that can happen virtually anywhere and lead to severe injuries.

Understanding the intricacies surrounding Slip and Fall Accidents is paramount if you’re going to take legal action. At its’ core, these accidents are defined by an individual slipping or tripping on another person’s property resulting in any degree of injury. In most instances, it revolves around premises liability where store owners or landlords fail to maintain their properties suitably causing potentially hazardous conditions.

Key factors often come into play during the evaluation phase in slip-and-fall accident lawsuits:

• Proving negligence: The key criterion is demonstrating that the landowner was negligent concerning maintenance or repair of their premises.

• Location of the incident: A detailed outline of the precise location where your accident occurred.

• Visibility problems: Dim lighting creating visibility issues.

• Personal behavior: Sometimes accidents occur due to non-compliance with demonstrated safety measures.

It’s important as well while seeking compensation that you don’t mistakenly hold yourself entirely at fault when an unsafe environment contributed significantly to your fall.

The fallout from these accidents can be taxing emotionally, physically, and financially. Medical bills mount up quickly from hospital stays, medications, physical therapy sessions not excluded lost income due to time-off work recovering. If your loved one has suffered fatal injuries as a result of a slip-and-fall accident that could’ve been prevented through reasonable care closing the loop on accountability becomes even more critical..

Numbers might bring context but every case at Carlson Bier rises above figures because we understand there are life experiences being narrated alongside those statistics – each unique with layered complexity all deserving diligent testimonial representation in court.

Let us put our skills, insight and years of experience to work for you. Arnold Carlson & Dan Bier leads a dedicated, passionate team whose expertise in Illinois law coupled with their determined pursuit for justice has earned them the respect of insurance companies, defense attorneys and the courts.

Knowing what to do after a Slip and Fall Accident may not be very clear when one is overwhelmed by the pain or emotional trauma resulting from it. That is why we recommend prioritizing medical attention first, then documenting all aspects about your accident before reaching out to a legal professional equipped at unraveling these events into a compelling lawsuit case.

Our commitment as your trusted personal injury firm doesn’t just start with taking on cases but ensuring our clients know their rights, understand every stage in their claim process while keeping them extensively informed throughout that period. These are more than words – they represent principles underlining how we operate at Carlson Bier without compromising compassion.

Now armed with this information, you might wonder what’s next? How much is my case really worth? This answer varies significantly but don’t forget: You’re never alone during this difficult time because help is just one click away. At Carlson Bier getting help starts here: Click on the link below right now to find out how much your case could potentially be worth. There’s no obligation, so don’t wait another moment demanding the compensation you rightfully deserve – let us assist you today!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Glenview Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Glenview

Areas of Practice in Glenview

Bicycle Crashes

Expert in legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or hazardous conditions.

Flame Injuries

Supplying professional legal services for victims of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Medical Carelessness

Ensuring professional legal advice for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Responsibility

Addressing cases involving unsafe products, providing skilled legal services to customers affected by defective items.

Elder Abuse

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip and Stumble Accidents

Skilled in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking compensation for their injuries.

Neonatal Injuries

Extending legal guidance for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Crashes

Mishaps: Devoted to aiding sufferers of car accidents get reasonable remuneration for hurts and damages.

Motorbike Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for individuals involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring justice for damages.

Big Rig Accident

Extending adept legal assistance for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for harms.

Building Site Accidents

Concentrated on assisting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Cerebral Traumas

Committed to extending professional legal representation for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Harms

Specialized in tackling cases for persons who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Collisions

Specializing in legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Unjust Fatality

Working for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and professional legal guidance to ensure redress.

Neural Injury

Committed to representing victims with backbone trauma, offering professional legal services to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer