FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Godfrey

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the aftermath of a dog bite injury, navigating the legal complexities can feel overwhelming. The savvy team at Carlson Bier offers expert legal counsel to protect your rights and secure just compensation. As seasoned practitioners in personal injury law, we understand how traumatic such experiences can be and are prepared to champion your cause with utmost diligence. Based on our decade-long track record in Illinois, you can trust that we possess a profound understanding of local laws surrounding dog bites injuries cases without falsely implying any presence directly within Godfrey itself. At Carlson Bier, we believe each survivor is entitled to comprehensive representation regardless of their location – it is this ethos which empowers us in every case handled. Let our attorneys take some burden off your shoulders as they strategically maneuver through intricate details ensuring maximum insurance payout – all while affirming there’s no need for victims to face these battles alone anymore; choose Carlson Bier: leaders in advocacy for dog bite injuries across Illinois.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Godfrey Illinois

Dog bite injuries can be a traumatic experience, leading to physical and emotional scarring. When you or your loved ones are victims of such an event, it’s essential that competent legal assistance is by your side. At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury cases across Illinois including dog bite injuries, offering proficient counsel and representation that effectively addresses the unique facets of these particular incidents.

In the wake of a dog bite incident, time is indeed critical. An immediate documentation complete with photos and witness testimonies can make all the difference in building a solid case. Our expert attorneys at Carlson Bier will guide you through this process while ensuring every detail remains intact for a compelling presentation before Illinois courts.

Victims of dog bites often suffer from severe physical damage including but not limited to deep puncture wounds, scars, and even psychological trauma. Not only do these wounds necessitate medical attention, their aftermath frequently embodies extensive treatment costs along with pain and suffering:

• Medical bills: Emergency room visits, surgeries,

medications, physiotherapy sessions – all these add up

causing significant financial burden.

• Lost wages: Recovery period might compel victims to miss

work impacting their sources of income severely.

• Pain & suffering: The intangible yet profound distress

endured due to trauma should also be accounted for in

compensation claims.

As highlighted above, a multitude of expenses associated with recovery from post-dog-bite injuries can pile on quickly making it paramount that victims seek effective legal representation. Understanding this complex landscape requires experienced professionals like us at Carlson Bier who know exactly how Illinois laws operate; safeguarding your rights while seeking just reparation.

While no law speculates that dogs get ‘one free bite,’ Illinois implements strict liability concerning dog bites under the Animal Control Act. This means if a person can prove they were bit without provocation while conducting themselves peacefully upon any premises where they were allowed access – then the owner is liable for damages beyond any doubt. However, acquiring legal aid and navigating these intricate laws can often be overwhelming – at Carlson Bier, we make sure your case remains on solid ground, professionally combatting any potential defenses raised.

At the same time, dog owners might employ defenses like trespassing or contributing to their animal’s aggression to abnegate responsibility. A well-experienced lawyer like ours from Carlson Bier will meticulously scrutinize every angle of your story and counteract deceptively manufactured defences.

Furthermore, Illinois’ statute of limitations set a particular timeframe to bring forth personal injury claims following a dog bite incident – typically within two years post-incident. Hence, it becomes crucial not to delay seeking suitable legal counsel that ensures no forfeit occurs concerning rightful compensations.

Being targeted in a dog bite accident can induce a whirlpool of stress and turmoil – one that victims shouldn’t navigate alone. Here at Carlson Bier, you’re not just another client; you’re part of our family receiving top-notch representation with empathy and respect across every interaction.

Assisting citizens across Illinois with personalized attention to each case’s specifics, we ensure every person who seeks our help receives professional guidance that upholds their best interests while working towards recovering compensation they truly deserve.

Investing trust in us brings invaluable reassurance in maneuvering through this challenging phase helping get life back on track swiftly minus unwanted anxiety or fear about uncertainty looming over potential outcomes.

Before signing off, remember your rights matter—never discount them! Take this chance to click the button below and determine what your case could potentially be worth—one simple click holds immense power to change the course favorably hastening healing backed by justice served right! Take control today —You absolutely deserve it!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Godfrey Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Godfrey

Areas of Practice in Godfrey

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Proficient in legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Scald Injuries

Supplying skilled legal help for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or carelessness.

Medical Misconduct

Delivering professional legal services for victims affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Obligation

Managing cases involving dangerous products, offering specialist legal assistance to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Malpractice

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble and Tumble Mishaps

Professional in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal support to victims seeking justice for their losses.

Newborn Injuries

Providing legal guidance for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Motor Crashes

Collisions: Committed to supporting individuals of car accidents get just remuneration for harms and losses.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Focused on providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for harm.

Truck Crash

Ensuring expert legal services for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for losses.

Building Site Incidents

Dedicated to assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Cerebral Traumas

Dedicated to offering dedicated legal assistance for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Traumas

Specialized in tackling cases for people who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Jogger Accidents

Dedicated to legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Fatality

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and skilled legal support to ensure justice.

Vertebral Harm

Specializing in defending clients with paralysis, offering expert legal services to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440