...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Golconda

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the aftermath of a dog bite injury, you want someone who understands your struggle and fights for your rights tirelessly. That’s what Carlson Bier is here to do. We are dedicated personal injury attorneys, skilled particularly in handling dog bite cases throughout Illinois including Golconda. Our commitment to maintaining comprehensive knowledge on the relevant laws allows us to provide unparalleled legal representation needed for such specific injury claims as dog bites. With our rehearsed advocacy, exceptional negotiation skills and attention-to-detail approach, we work diligently towards securing maximum restitution while holding responsible parties accountable. Importantly, we sit down with clients; listen empathetically; then administer an actionable roadmap pivoting upon their circumstance at zero upfront cost! Opting Carlson Bier means opting victory: decades of triumphant settlement history across Illinois deliver evidence-solid proof that we’re top-tier specialists when it comes to serving justice for victims of canine-inflicted injuries. Don’t let another day pass without defending your privileges – reach out immediately so together we can work towards getting you compensated justly from this ordeal.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Golconda Illinois

Carlson Bier, recognized as an eminent personal injury law firm based in Illinois, stands by your side when you encounter the traumatic aftermath of Dog Bite Injuries. Our accomplished lawyers understand that being a victim of a dog bite inflicts not just physical scars but emotional trauma too and hence are committed to offering comprehensive legal support for your case.

The complexity of dog bite injuries often leaves individuals baffled by the recourse they can seek. At Carlson Bier, we aim to dispel this confusion through our unparalleled expertise and guidance.

Dog bite lawsuits encompass several key factors; primary among them is establishing ownership of the dog in question. Owners could be held liable for the actions of their dogs, particularly if negligence can be established on their part. Additionally, understanding ‘strict liability’ under Illinois State Law becomes crucial here: even if the dog has never shown previous signs of aggression or bitten someone else before, its owner can still be deemed responsible for any damages caused.

It’s also essential to note that the nature and extent of injuries have a tremendous bearing on these lawsuits. The spectrum includes but isn’t limited to puncture wounds, crushing damage to muscles or bones, nerve damage leading to loss or impairment of function, scarring/disfigurement and psychological trauma resulting from attack incidents.

While attempting resolution outside court might sound tempting due to faster settlements they offer at times; it’s significant for victims to understand recuperation costs extend beyond hospital expenses alone:

• Possible need for reconstructive surgery.

• Physical therapy requirement post-discharge.

• Price circuiting mental health counseling owing to emotional distress.

• Loss of income due-to incapacitation during recovery period.

• Long-term care needs in severe cases like disability induced by bites.

Furthermore, determining ‘comparative negligence’ plays an intricate role in how much compensation amount one may receive. This pertains whether the injured party somehow incited or aggravated the dog resulting in getting bitten. It’s hence advised to strictly resist from providing any statements without legal advice that might inadvertently suggest such provocation on your part.

At the end of the day, pursuing a personal injury claim for dog bite injuries is not just about seeking compensation. It’s more so about bringing justice to victims, enforcing responsible pet ownership, and ensuring public safety and welfare at large.

Carlson Bier ensures thorough investigation combined with aggressive representation in all phases ranging from meticulous fact-finding to potent negotiation and compelling litigation if needed. We aim for nothing but delivering justice owed to you while providing unwavering support throughout this convoluted process.

Our objective remains steadfast: to work relentlessly towards securing maximum possible compensation, thereby aiding you immensely during this arduous recuperation journey. Our team studies each case comprehensively, allowing us to take a holistic approach in dealing with complexities often associated with these cases.

The attorneys at Carlson Bier are fervently dedicated toward playing an instrumental role both within and beyond courtroom confines; their transformational touch takes shape in myriad forms – be it robust client-attorney bonds effused with empathy or exemplary performance galvanizing entire resource routes working tirelessly behind the scene.

We hope the above insights shed some valuable light on understanding dog bite injury lawsuits under Illinois law. For further specifics suited accurately embracing intricacies of your unique case, we cordially invite meeting our qualified professionals who would unfold focused clarifications customized coveting concerns clenching you currently.

Fear no further! Partner up today with Carlson Bier; armed fiercely wielding knowledge as an unparalleled power weapon fighting to forge your path through ferocity of adversity leading into luminosity of utmost relief echoing ‘Justice delivered’. Harness even tiniest potential left fuelling indomitable spirit dwelling deep inside perhaps pained presently yet surely destined towards blossoming into invincible strength soon enough!

With bated breath brimming immense optimism bound bounding ahead fasten your grip firmer feeling highly hopeful! Click on the button below to find out how much your case is worth. Allow our team at Carlson Bier help you in turning this overwhelmingly intimidating ordeal into a lifelong triumph scripted studded unfaltering determination. Here’s wishing every step you take from here leads closer towards victorious veracity marking emergence of an empowered ‘You’ emerging resilient scripting inspiring chronicles caught captivating one breath after another.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Golconda Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Golconda

Areas of Practice in Golconda

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Expert in legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Flame Wounds

Giving professional legal advice for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or indifference.

Medical Misconduct

Delivering expert legal representation for patients affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Accountability

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, supplying expert legal help to individuals affected by harmful products.

Aged Malpractice

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring justice.

Stumble & Fall Injuries

Professional in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking compensation for their harm.

Neonatal Injuries

Providing legal guidance for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Incidents: Committed to aiding victims of car accidents get just remuneration for damages and harm.

Bike Mishaps

Specializing in providing representation for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

Trucking Accident

Providing specialist legal advice for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for harms.

Building Site Crashes

Concentrated on supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Cerebral Traumas

Dedicated to delivering compassionate legal services for individuals suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Traumas

Expertise in handling cases for clients who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Focused on legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Unfair Fatality

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing empathetic and experienced legal services to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Damage

Focused on representing clients with spinal cord injuries, offering expert legal assistance to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer