FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Goodfield

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the unsettling aftermath of a dog bite injury in Goodfield, Carlson Bier stands as your best ally. Our experienced team thoroughly understands Illinois’ complex dog bite laws and vigorously advocates for victims. With our unmatched legal skills and deep compassion for clients, we adeptly manage every aspect of your claim—fending off insurance companies pushing to settle quickly and inadequately. At Carlson Bier, you aren’t just another case number – you’re treated with utmost respect as we diligently fight for justice on your behalf. Having dealt with numerous Dog Bite Injuries cases in Illinois, our seasoned attorneys are equipped not only to guide you through this uncharted territory but to bring about maximum recovery too. In times of such distress, entrust yourself in the hands-on approach and committed advocacy offered by Carlson Bier; it’s strategic peace-of-mind at its highest degree—you can rest assured that someone is fighting steadfastly for what’s rightfully yours without stretching beyond the boundaries set by law or ethics.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Goodfield Illinois

In the realm of personal injury law, Carlson Bier is a leading name with deep roots in Illinois. Committed to securing justice for clients who have suffered injuries under unfortunate circumstances, we know our duty extends beyond simple disputes and reaches into profoundly affecting realms. One such realm is dog bite injuries – a division of personal injury law that entails its own specific legalities and complexities.

A dog bite incident can be as traumatic as it is unexpected, leaving victims dealing with physical pain, emotional distress, and overwhelming medical expenses. Let’s delve deeper into the intricate process of understanding this unique aspect of personal injury cases.

Firstly, what constitutes a dog bite case? Any encounter with an aggressive or uncontrolled animal resulting in bodily harm qualifies as a dog bite case. This includes scrapes or cuts due to an animal jumping on you aggressively causing you to fall over or more severe outcomes such as muscle damage from an actual bite.

Secondly, understanding Illinois Dog Bite Law becomes essential when seeking reparation for your losses. The state operates under ‘strict liability’ rules regarding pet owners, making them liable if their pet causes injuries, even without prior indications of aggression in the animal’s behavior. However, exceptions occur when victims provoke dogs or trespass private property without permission – these actions may restrict compensation worthiness entirely or partially.

Claims related to permanent scars or disability caused by dog bites are major considerations within settling lawsuits; each claim must conform meticulously to dictated timelines and statutes associated with personal injury laws governing the land legally defined boundaries influenced by local ordinances called “leash laws.”

One should also consider preserving evidence after suffering from a dog bite incident- this encompasses medical records detailing extent & nature of injuries corroborating plaintiff’s claims along with photographs taken immediately post event capturing raw specifics unpolluted by time-lapse factors subjective justifications would fail undermining objective truth quality content preserved thus provides irrefutable proof at court proceedings elevating chances towards earning justified remuneration.

Injured parties may pursue compensation for expenses incurred, including medical bills and lost wages due to an inability to work. Compensation can also extend towards non-economic damages such as pain & suffering, mental anguish, or decrease in life’s quality caused by permanent damage – physical or psychological

Now we understand that successfully navigating through the complex landscape of personal injury cases requires professional legal counsel. This is where Carlson Bier comes in. As experienced Illinois-based lawyers specialized in personal injury law with a keen focus on dog bite injuries, we help our clients grapple with these burdensome processes easing their way towards achieving deserved justice.

We aim at negotiating fair settlements for our clients directly with defending parties or taking legal recourse via courts if needed supervising entire process from initial consultations through claim filings till settling lawsuits diligently preserving client rights standing affirmation against oppressors no matter how challenging circumstances become

All this engenders a potent question: How much is your case worth? It is difficult to assign a blanket estimate considering each case’s unique intricacies comprising victim situations varying per incident severity extent of liability insurance availability among several other critical elements best understood evaluated only under professional guidance specific expertise vast experience arena per se That said Carlson Bier is committed facilitating solutions every step along journey of seeking rightful recompense after enduring traumatic ordeal dog bite.

Hence recognizing complexity intertwined within each case necessitates firm resolution seek expert advice apt guidance mitigate risks maximize returns potential lawsuit very instance when one suffers untimely grievous setbacks

At this point it must be noted that while we proudly serve various regions across the state we only establish offices within boundaries mapped by concrete legal jurisdictions making us strictly abide laws forbidding false representations regarding office locations

Lastly dear reader if you or loved one has been unfortunate victim harrowing dog bite experience know that life-altering aftermaths need not rob joys hope future away Click button below discover value your case first step securing justice reclaiming peace reclaiming life initiating healing process embarking journey towards recovery.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Goodfield Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Goodfield

Areas of Practice in Goodfield

Bike Crashes

Focused on legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Fire Traumas

Giving skilled legal support for people of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Physician Negligence

Extending specialist legal representation for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Liability

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, extending professional legal support to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip & Trip Accidents

Adept in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking restitution for their suffering.

Infant Harms

Extending legal support for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Crashes

Accidents: Concentrated on helping victims of car accidents secure equitable remuneration for wounds and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal support for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

Big Rig Crash

Delivering adept legal services for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recovery for damages.

Building Accidents

Focused on supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Neurological Traumas

Committed to ensuring dedicated legal support for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Traumas

Specialized in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered wounds from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Focused on legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Loss

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering sensitive and expert legal services to ensure restitution.

Vertebral Impairment

Expert in advocating for persons with spinal cord injuries, offering expert legal support to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440