FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Goodfield

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or your loved one has suffered from a spinal cord injury, seeking dedicated and expert legal assistance should be your utmost priority. In circumstances as sensitive as these, the law firm of Carlson Bier stands out through its proficiency in handling cases related to Spinal Cord Injuries. Our seasoned attorneys possess experience par excellence when it comes to providing representation for personal injury victims involving intricate matters of medical negligence and wrongful accidents that result in spinal injuries. Distinctively known and respected across the board without borders, we assist clients in Goodfield with unyielding dedication while ensuring they receive not only rightful compensation but also exceptional counsel throughout the process. As advocates who prioritize our clients’ welfare above all else, Carlson Bier’s core values lie firmly within compassion coupled with relentless advocacy for justice served rightfully. In quest of an attorney bringing expertise specifically tailored around Spinal Cord Injury cases? Your search ends at Carlson Bier; contact us today so we can make this difficult journey easier together.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Goodfield Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our attorneys possess extensive experience and remarkable competence in a wide array of personal injury law specifics, including Spinal Cord Injuries (SCIs). Recognized as one of the leading personal injury firms in Illinois, we aim to empower our clients with valuable information that can help them navigate their injuries more effectively.

Understanding Spinal Cord Injuries is pivotal given their seriousness and life-altering impacts on the patients. A spinal cord injury occurs when there’s damage to any part of the spinal cord or nerves. This condition often results in permanent changes to strength, sensation and functionality below the site of injury.

The severity and outcomes are largely dependent on two factors:

1. The level where the injury occurs: Higher injuries usually result in more paralysis.

2. The extent of injury: Complete injuries involve total loss of sensation and function below the injured area while incomplete ones may preserve some functions.

Spinal Cord Injuries may emerge from various causative incidents such as car accidents, falls, sports accidents or violent encounters – situations which are unfortunately very common, thus constituting a public health concern warranting significant legal attention.

As victims grapple with emotional turmoil post-SCI incident accompanied by skyrocketing medical costs and potential loss of income due to impairment or disability; understanding how to seek legal redress becomes crucial for optimal recovery over time.

At Carlson Bier, we leverage our deep experience in this area to provide comprehensive representation for SCI victims – helping you understand your rights, establishing liability of errant parties involved in your accident and finally negotiating just compensation commensurate with current struggle plus future implications related to your SCI.

We have served numerous SCI victims successfully delivering advantageous verdicts while offering steadfast support throughout daunting litigation processes. We want you not only sustained during courtroom battles but also well-equipped with knowledge about SCIs enabling informed decisions critical for securing deserved reparations.

When it comes to seeking damages after an SCI diagnosis; duration since injury, cost of current/future medical expenses, impact on earnings, need for rehabilitation or custodial care plus psychological trauma are key considerations we take into account when negotiating your rightful compensation.

It is also crucial that victims understand their statute limitations governing the time limit within which a personal injury claim needs to be filed. In Illinois, this timeframe generally extends to two years from incident occurrence but may vary depending on specifics; hence seeking expert legal counsel as early as possible paves way for comprehensive case building in a timely manner.

Furthermore at Carlson Bier, we operate with full transparency regarding fees assuring our clients that unless we secure a beneficial verdict on their behalf; they owe us nothing. We champion a client’s right to quality representation irrespective of financial capability hence this no-win-no-fee commitment that liberates you from unnecessary financial stress while focusing on recovery and justice.

In conclusion, dealing with Spinal Cord Injuries can certainly be overwhelming but armed with knowledge coupled with the backing of proficient legal representation like ours; one doesn’t have to endure the entire ordeal alone. If you or your loved ones have fallen victim to SCI due to another’s negligence; it’s pertinent you benefit from informed legal advocacy by reaching out today and exploring how best we can serve you.

Ready to explore what may lay ahead? Click on the button below for an obligation-free evaluation helping delineate indicative value of your case – because at Carlson Bier, Justice isn’t just a concept – It’s what propels us every day into championing rights of personal injury victims so they can reclaim control over their life journey post-trauma.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Goodfield Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Goodfield

Areas of Practice in Goodfield

Bicycle Mishaps

Expert in legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or hazardous conditions.

Burn Damages

Offering specialist legal support for patients of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or indifference.

Hospital Negligence

Offering dedicated legal representation for victims affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Items Liability

Addressing cases involving problematic products, delivering specialist legal help to individuals affected by harmful products.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Supporting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble & Slip Accidents

Skilled in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking recovery for their harm.

Newborn Wounds

Delivering legal help for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Motor Mishaps

Accidents: Committed to assisting victims of car accidents secure equitable recompense for hurts and destruction.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Committed to providing representation for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

Semi Incident

Delivering professional legal assistance for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for harms.

Building Site Crashes

Focused on assisting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or recklessness.

Cognitive Harms

Expert in extending specialized legal support for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Damages

Adept at dealing with cases for persons who have suffered harms from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Accidents

Committed to legal support for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Loss

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and adept legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Backbone Injury

Focused on advocating for individuals with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal representation to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440