FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Goodings Grove

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a Spinal Cord Injury can be incredibly life-altering and complex. At Carlson Bier, we hold an explicit focus on such cases, leveraging our distinct depth of expertise to provide unparalleled legal representation for the community of Goodings Grove. We understand the complexities surrounding spinal cord injuries; from debilitating pain to mounting medical expenses, and rehabilitative care costs – it’s distressing enough without taking into consideration the ensuing legal battles. That’s where we come in – at Carlson Bier, you are not just another case number but an individual deserving respect and justice. Armed with vast knowledge on Illinois law pertaining to personal injuries, especially spinal cord injuries cases; empathetic understanding is juxtaposed with our ruthless tenacity in fighting for your rightful compensation against responsible parties or insurance companies refusing full settlement payments. With Carlson Bier representing your interests as a top-tier Spinal Cord Injuries lawyer choice well regarded by residents of Goodings Grove; you’re assured expertly navigated pathways towards successful legal resolutions.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Goodings Grove Illinois

Carlson Bier is a dedicated coalition of skilled personal injury lawyers based in the state of Illinois, armed with decades of experience while providing unparalleled legal services to clients. We have developed a knack in the niche of personal injury law, more specifically Spinal Cord Injuries; we fight tooth and nail for those impacted by such life-altering injuries.

Spinal cord injuries are catastrophic damages that could drastically affect one’s daily activities, not forgetting their emotional and psychological wellbeing. These injuries result from diverse incidents such as auto accidents, sports-related mishaps, slip-and-fall situations or even workplace accidents. Every year approximately 17,810 new cases are recorded in the United States alone according to National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Centre (NSCISC).

Regardless of how these traumas occur, Carlson Bier is deeply committed to seeking justice for victims suffering from spinal cord injuries across Illinois. We understand that these ailments can be overwhelmingly complex- ranging from bruising or pressure on the spinal cord (contusion /compression), disruptions entirely through the spine (transection) or even damages critical areas affecting specific functions like breathing (central cord syndrome).

Each type of spinal injury harbors its unique challenges and complications involving:

• Enormous Medical Bills: Costs related to surgeries, rehabilitation sessions among others.

• Lost Wages: Being unable to work or engage in income-generating activity due to your healing and recovery phase.

• Pain and Suffering: Hardship borne out by physical discomforts following an accident proves tremendously significant.

• Permanent Disability: Experiencing long-term impediments due to paralysis instigated by spinal cord damage.

Such encompassing issues weigh heavily on our operations at Carlson Bier where we value your complete wellbeing over mere representation – both current circumstances alongside future implications revolving around continual costs volunteer modifications among many others. Our modus operandi revolves around demonstrating proof liability against negligent parties—the burdensome task inclusive of displaying breaches within their duty of care, exhibiting consequential physical harm or losses and quantifying the damage done in pecuniary methods.

Walk with Carlson Bier; we’re your beacon of hope on these treacherous roads to justice for spinal cord victims. We strive towards beckoning a beneficial compensation package while assuring essential comfort throughout your journey.

Moreover, forget not that each case is unique, making its evaluation critical to determining whether you’re at liberty to place a claim or not. Many variables come into play here: the party at fault (if clear), whether multiple parties exist, applicable insurance policies among other factors. It’s imperative hence to contact an adept legal representative such as Carlson Bier fervently committed to your cause hence allowing focused determinations associated with standing up for individual rights against daunting insurance companies or even negligent individuals responsible for your predicament.

Personal injury statutes might also present varying timelines (Statute Of Limitations) during which compensation claims have validity- another crucial element that our attorneys are well-versed with hence ensuring we meet all deadlines and promptly work on cases presented.

Partnering with a trusted ally like Carlson Bier provides tremendous peace of mind. Our clients appreciate direct lines of communication alongside compassionate professional relationships as we collectively cruise through challenging medical jargon/legalese enabling better understanding & decision-making prowess throughout this ordeal.

Having dissected invaluable insights regarding Spinal Cord Injuries within the realm of personal injury law and gained immense value from it as a reader. Why not further unravel specifics tied inclusively and exclusively to your scenario? The team at Carlson Bier invites you enthusiastically to uncover how much worthiness exists within your case right here! Please feel encouraged to click the button below as the first stake towards reclaiming control over this uncertain fog clouding justice, resolution and potential restitution steps away!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Goodings Grove Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Goodings Grove

Areas of Practice in Goodings Grove

Cycling Accidents

Specializing in legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or risky conditions.

Fire Injuries

Giving professional legal help for victims of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or carelessness.

Hospital Negligence

Ensuring dedicated legal advice for victims affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Merchandise Accountability

Addressing cases involving defective products, delivering skilled legal services to customers affected by harmful products.

Senior Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Fall and Slip Accidents

Specialist in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking recovery for their suffering.

Childbirth Damages

Delivering legal aid for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Car Incidents

Crashes: Concentrated on supporting individuals of car accidents obtain just payout for wounds and losses.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Focused on providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Big Rig Crash

Ensuring professional legal services for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for harms.

Worksite Crashes

Committed to assisting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Head Damages

Focused on offering specialized legal assistance for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Harms

Proficient in managing cases for persons who have suffered damages from canine attacks or animal attacks.

Jogger Accidents

Committed to legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Undeserved Death

Striving for relatives affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and expert legal representation to ensure redress.

Neural Damage

Committed to advocating for individuals with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440