FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Grand Boulevard

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you have been involved in a pedestrian accident in Grand Boulevard, securing competent legal representation should be a priority. Carlson Bier, an esteemed Illinois law firm, offers unrivaled expertise in this field. Our team specializes in addressing the complex issues faced by pedestrians who become victims of road accidents. At Carlson Bier, we understand the significant physical and emotional hardships you may experience after such an incident. Hence, our dedicated attorneys work tirelessly to ensure your rights are upheld throughout all proceedings.We strive to build persuasive arguments that optimize your settlement potential or favorable judgment outcomes.

Demonstrating fault is integral for obtaining compensation and requires profound understanding of traffic laws – something our top-rated lawyers pride themselves on having. Studies indicate that experienced law firms like ours significantly increase chances of successful outcomes compared with self-representation.As pedestrian accident advocates functioning at the apex of personal injury law domain within Illinois state limits,CaCarlson Bier could prove instrumental towards restoring balance back into your life post tragedy.Get recompensed fairly; let us assist you today as we’ve done effectively for numerous others before

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Grand Boulevard Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we stand as your trusted personal injury attorneys in Illinois. Recognized for our dedication to serving accident victims and their families, we offer expert representation in cases of pedestrian accidents — a specialty that requires extensive knowledge and understanding.

A situation involving a pedestrian accident can be complex and emotionally taxing. These incidents typically involve pedestrians who have been injured or killed due to traffic accidents. Many contributing factors can contribute to such unfortunate events including poor road conditions, driver negligence, or the lack of proper signaling equipment on the roads.

Understanding the intricacies of Illinois law is critical when dealing with pedestrian accidents. Liability varies depending if the injury was caused by negligent acts like speeding, driving under the influence, failure to yield at crosswalks or ignoring traffic signals. At Carlson Bier, we painstakingly analyze each case detail – from roadway settings and potential distractions to witness accounts.

Pedestrian injuries often result in substantial financial burdens because of medical bills or lost wages due to missed work time. Our job at Carlson Bier is two-fold: demonstrating culpability on part of those responsible; and ensuring insurance companies provide fair compensation you’re entitled to under Illinois law.

Beware that accepting an insurer’s initial offer might deny one full compensation rights later on even when subsequent costs arise post-accident—an essential bit of information often unknown among victims.

An invaluable aspect while dealing with these circumstances involves understanding what damages can be claimed:

• Medical Expenses: This includes all general hospital visits, surgeries, medication needs and ongoing treatment costs.

• Lost Income: If one is unable to earn usual wages due to physical limitations post-accident.

• Pain & Suffering: It represents the psychological trauma experienced as a direct result of your accident.

• Loss of Normal Life: In instances where you can no longer enjoy activities routinely done before accident occurrence.

Trust us when we say—we leave no stone unturned in retrieving every penny rightfully owed to our clients.

Our service doesn’t merely end at financial recovery. At Carlson Bier, we realize the distress experienced post-accident that includes dealing with health care providers and navigating insurance claim complexities. Our commitment goes beyond courtroom strategy – it extends into helping you regain normality after this life-altering event.

We have built an excellent track record in handling pedestrian accidents throughout Illinois; our firm takes pride in successfully representing hundreds of such cases demandingly fought against major insurance companies.

Choosing Carlson Bier ensures representation by a team of highly skilled attorneys who possess comprehensive knowledge about civil liability laws and are well versed in all aspects of litigation both inside and outside the courtroom.

At Carlson Bier, our relationship doesn’t end when a settlement check is issued – As your personal injury attorneys, it’s not just about legalities but also providing support to help rebuild your life again post-trauma.

Invite us on your journey towards recovery today—Our ‘Case Value’ button located below allows a quick evaluation concerning potential compensation for pain, suffering or damages inflicted due to an unfortunate incident involving pedestrian accidents. We welcome you on board—and assure nothing short of dedicated professional assistance geared towards delivering justice rightfully owed to you as per The Land Of Lincoln’s laws.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Grand Boulevard Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Grand Boulevard

Areas of Practice in Grand Boulevard

Bike Accidents

Proficient in legal services for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' negligence or risky conditions.

Flame Wounds

Extending adept legal help for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by incidents or carelessness.

Healthcare Misconduct

Providing professional legal support for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Accountability

Taking on cases involving defective products, delivering expert legal support to individuals affected by defective items.

Senior Misconduct

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble and Tumble Occurrences

Skilled in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to persons seeking redress for their suffering.

Infant Harms

Extending legal guidance for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Auto Incidents

Collisions: Dedicated to helping clients of car accidents get just settlement for hurts and impairment.

Bike Crashes

Committed to providing representation for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Semi Accident

Ensuring professional legal assistance for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for hurts.

Construction Site Incidents

Committed to representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Neurological Impairments

Committed to delivering professional legal assistance for patients suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Damages

Proficient in managing cases for clients who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Collisions

Focused on legal support for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Wrongful Loss

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and expert legal representation to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Committed to supporting individuals with spinal cord injuries, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​