FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Grandwood Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from dog bite injuries can be a distressing scenario, requiring immediate legal attention. Carlson Bier has earned a reputation for offering effective representation for those affected in Grandwood Park. Our team is highly-skilled and proficient when it comes to Illinois dog bite injury laws, dedicated to defend your rights and help you seek the compensations that you rightfully deserve. We understand how critical these situations are. Often times coupled with severe physical pain, these incidents also carry emotional trauma and financial burden due to medical expenses & lost wages. This line of craft calls for more than just knowledge about the law; empathy and intuitiveness play equal roles too – something our attorneys take pride in excelling at! Being victimized by a pet no way means being victimized again by daunting legal processes or negligent parties! Let Carlson Bier mitigate this struggle with capable hands navigating through all complexities of your case’s intricacies right upto achieving successful closure.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Grandwood Park Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the trauma and distress dog bite injuries can cause. Beyond being physically painful, they often lead to emotional and mental scars that can last a lifetime. In Illinois, such incidents are unfortunately common due to its high population of pet owners.

Understanding the legal aspects around dog bite injuries is just as essential as seeking medical attention post-incident. In Illinois, under the Animal Control Act, liability generally rests on the animal’s owner or caretaker. Should an unprovoked attack occur causing injury on public property or while lawfully on private premises, the person responsible for the dog becomes liable for civil damages.

Key factors about Dog Bite laws in Illinois include:

• Illinois is a strict liability state: This means that regardless of whether the incident was unpreventable due to precautions taken by the owner or if the pet had no history of aggressive behavior – if their animal bites someone, they bear responsibility.

• A negligence claim can also be made: If proving that an owner failed to exercise reasonable care preventing dog aggression is possible – grounds for a negligence claim exist.

• The ‘One-bite rule’ does not apply here: Many states implement this rule absolving owners from liability if it was their pet’s first known biting incident. However, no such provision exists in Illinois law.

As your personal injury attorneys at Carlson Bier, we work tirelessly to ensure you receive justice and compensation for your suffering caused by unfettered pets causing harm. From lost wages during recovery periods and any required physical therapy costs after sustaining severe injuries – our goal is helping make whole those adversely affected by these unfortunate events.

Dog bite cases may seem straightforward on paper but navigating through them surely isn’t – especially when pain and shock linger post-injury. Our team possesses extensive experience dealing with personal injury claims specifically stemming from animal attacks. We pay meticulous attention towards gathering pertinent facts so all appropriate legal angles get considered ensuring best outcomes possible.

Witnesses play a monumental role in validating your claims. Our team will track down any eyewitnesses and collect their testimonies, merging these accounts with your own experiences to construct undeniable factual supporting evidence for your case. We engage open lines of communication ensuring you remain informed throughout the journey from start till successful resolution.

Although many people focus on physical scars left behind post-dog attack, Carlson Bier prioritizes accounting emotional trauma too while seeking compensatory damages. The harrowing memories can cause anxiety, nightmares or even phobias creating long-term detrimental effects upon victims’ lives – we remain steadfast about making sure this gets acknowledged within proceedings.

We encourage anyone who has suffered a dog bite incident to use our purpose-built tool available below which promptly provides a bespoke estimate on how much compensation they might be entitled to in Illinois under state law. Click the button now to get started and find out what your claim could be worth!

At Carlson Bier, personal investigations aren’t just given top priority; every one of our clients receives empathetic service with compassion underscoring all interactions because we’re not solely after justice but also at ameliorating pain inherent within those who’ve been hurt physically & emotionally due unchecked pet aggression. You’re not alone; let us help you recover what you rightfully deserve.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Grandwood Park Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Grandwood Park

Areas of Practice in Grandwood Park

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Specializing in legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Damages

Extending expert legal services for victims of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or negligence.

Physician Carelessness

Delivering dedicated legal support for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Liability

Handling cases involving dangerous products, offering professional legal guidance to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Neglect

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring justice.

Trip and Slip Incidents

Professional in dealing with trip accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking restitution for their damages.

Birth Injuries

Supplying legal support for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Crashes: Devoted to helping clients of car accidents receive fair payout for wounds and destruction.

Bike Incidents

Expert in providing legal assistance for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

Truck Mishap

Delivering expert legal assistance for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for injuries.

Construction Site Collisions

Dedicated to supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or recklessness.

Neurological Traumas

Committed to ensuring specialized legal assistance for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Damages

Adept at handling cases for clients who have suffered traumas from dog bites or animal assaults.

Jogger Collisions

Committed to legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Passing

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and expert legal assistance to ensure justice.

Neural Harm

Expert in supporting victims with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal support to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440