FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Grant Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When facing the unfortunate situation of a dog bite injury in Grant Park, choosing the right legal representation is critical. That’s where Carlson Bier steps in — as an outstanding attorney group specializing in personal injury cases, particularly those linked to dog bites. With their stellar state-wide reputation and unmatched track record for success, they stand out among their Illinois counterparts. They are well versed with all intricacies of Illinois Dog Bite Law and are committed to turn every stone necessary to secure justice for their clients who have suffered due to such mishaps and negligence. By seeking assistance from Carlson Bier, you can be confident that your case will unfailingly receive personalized attention combined with vigorous advocacy aimed at achieving maximum compensation on your behalf. Entrust your worries into our capable hands; You deserve the best possible outcome after experiencing a pernicious event like this one—Carlson Bier promises just that while addressing all legal complexities involved confidently and proficiently.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Grant Park Illinois

Dog Bite Injuries – unfortunate occurrences that often involve legal claims and settlements, necessitates a top-notch personal injury attorney’s expertise who thoroughly understands the Illinois legal framework. Carlson Bier is an established law firm based out of Illinois, specializing in personal injury law with significant experience handling dog bite cases.

Did you know that annually over 4.5 million dog bites occur in the United States? A shocking statistic indeed, accentuating the need for more public education on this matter. Among these incidents, nearly one-fifth require medical attention because they result in severe injuries such as puncture wounds, lacerations, broken bones, nerve damage or even risk of infection from bacteria like Pasteurella and Capnocytophaga.

With each dog bite incident being unique due to varying circumstances like different breeds involved, multiple types of injuries caused and different insurance coverage policies held by owners- it’s crucial to have skilled representation by someone possessing specialized knowledge of navigating all potential obstacles posed by these factors. Here are key things to remember about personal injury cases involving Dog Bit Injuries:

• Dog owner liability: In Illinois, the state follows strict liability concerning dog bites—meaning that the canine’s owner is liable for any damages if their pet attacks someone unprovoked.

• Statute limitations: The victim has two years from the date they were bitten to file a lawsuit against the responsible party.

• Comparative fault: If the victim provoked or knowingly courted danger causing the attack; it may impact compensation received.

Illinois law protects persons harmed by dogs affirming your rights but maximizing those rights requires sound counsel early on when collecting evidence and calculating damages possible ensuring full compensation recovery rightfully deserved.

Yet another important aspect often overlooked when dealing with such incidents is psychological distress faced by victims following a traumatic event like being attacked by a dog- Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is common among individuals who have suffered such attacks; hence emotional trauma is included during compensatory damages calculation. This broadens the outlook on compensation beyond physical injuries to mental and emotional suffering, thus, providing a more comprehensive cover for the victim.

Carlson Bier’s personal injury attorneys based in Illinois boast an exceptional track record of successful recoveries achieved from dog bite incidents due to their solid grasp on specificities defining how such cases are handled. Their approach ensures that rightful justice isn’t just sought after but served as each case demands.

At Carlson Bier, we believe that every client deserves personalized attention, professional advice tailored specifically for them with appropriate representation within courtrooms if necessary- all done aiming to secure maximum compensation owing while ensuring victim recovery goes uninterrupted without financial worry. Our law firm stands committed not only towards fighting for your rights but educating you about them too; which makes us stand out as more than just lawyers— rather partners you can trust when navigating through challenging times following unfortunate incidents like these.

Such stressful circumstances often leave victims overwhelmed concerning planning their next course of action hence why experienced guidance becomes crucial advising upon how best pursuing claim settlements serving client interests most effectively. To help bring clarity about legal options available post-Personal Injury brought by Dog Bite Incidents in Illinois: click on the down button below facilitating understanding of what potential claim value your case holds thereby deciding appropriate steps ahead intelligently minus unnecessary confusion – let’s begin this journey towards healing and justice together today!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Grant Park Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Grant Park

Areas of Practice in Grant Park

Bicycle Mishaps

Expert in legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' negligence or perilous conditions.

Fire Traumas

Offering skilled legal advice for patients of major burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Physician Negligence

Providing expert legal advice for persons affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Products Obligation

Managing cases involving dangerous products, providing specialist legal guidance to consumers affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Neglect

Advocating for the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip and Trip Occurrences

Adept in dealing with tumble accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking recovery for their suffering.

Newborn Injuries

Offering legal support for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in infant injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Accidents: Concentrated on supporting sufferers of car accidents obtain reasonable remuneration for damages and damages.

Bike Incidents

Focused on providing legal support for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

18-Wheeler Collision

Offering specialist legal support for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for hurts.

Construction Site Crashes

Committed to assisting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Neurological Impairments

Expert in extending professional legal assistance for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Damages

Adept at handling cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Collisions

Committed to legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Unjust Demise

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and expert legal services to ensure restitution.

Neural Impairment

Expert in defending persons with backbone trauma, offering professional legal guidance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440