Bicycle Accidents in Grayslake

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the aftermath of a bicycle accident in Grayslake, navigating legal complexities can be daunting. It’s critical to have highly skilled representation that emphasizes both professionalism and empathy. This is where Carlson Bier excels. We are personal injury attorneys specializing in bicycle accidents, providing unparalleled advocacy for those impacted by such unfortunate circumstances. With extensive experience handling complex cases related to bicycle law violations or negligence claims, we strive to secure rightful compensation for our clients’ physical injuries and emotional distress. Our seasoned lawyers possess robust knowledge of Illinois traffic laws, ensuring effective litigation strategies tailored specifically to each case’s unique aspects. Trust us at Carlson Bier; we treat each client’s situation with the diligence it deserves while aiming for favorable resolutions as swiftly as possible – all without compromising on your rights or interests under Illinois law—the chosen law firm when needing guidance after Bicycle Accidents: Carlson Bier.

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Grayslake Illinois

Experience the commitment and expertise of Carlson Bier, a preeminent Illinois personal injury law firm. We accentuate our capabilities by specializing in areas such as bicycle accidents. As carefreeness turns to caution on Illinois’ well-loved bike paths, our duty comes into play. We represent victims of these unfortunate events with unflinching determination, pursuing every recourse available for maximum compensation and justice.

Bicycle accidents can occur due to various reasons: a collision with a vehicle, hazardous road conditions, or faulty biking gear. The repercussions of these tragic incidents often extend beyond physical injuries; emotional turmoil and financial stress add to the plight of victims. Our passionate team at Carlson Bier tirelessly works towards mitigating this distress.

Understanding the common types of bicycle crashes is crucial for preventative measure:

– Left Cross: This typically happens when an oncoming car turns left, failing to see an approaching cyclist.

– Right Hook: Herein lies danger from cars making right-turns directly in front of cyclists.

– Door Prize (or Dooring): Occurs when an offside car door suddenly swings open into a bicyclist’s path.

Despite all safety measures taken, if you find yourself injured in any manner related to cycling mishaps, it’s time you engage legal representation that empathizes with you — Carlson Bier.

In Illinois’ complex legal landscape surrounding bike-related incidents, navigation requires experience which we possess abundantly. The insurance maze alone can intimidate those unfamiliar with its winding passages. Let us guide you through this labyrinth so your focus remains solely on recovery while we handle your case assiduously.

Our primary concern involves expediting your journey towards recuperation without additional burdens like exorbitant medical bills or lost wages weighing you down. Recognizing liability laws specific to Illinois is one way we conduct streamlined cases:

– Compensation Law: According to comparative negligence rules applicable within the state lines, even if victims contribute partially to their accident, they remain entitled to recover damages.

– Statute of Limitations: A limitation period applies to injury claims. Therefore, swift action after an incident heightens chances for reimbursement.

Our multipronged approach makes Carlson Bier a reliable partner. The steps we follow in representing victims include— thoroughly investigating the scene, compiling compelling evidence, negotiating with insurance companies and if required, taking your case to trial. Throughout proceedings, communication remains transparent and constant.

It is also worth noting that cost should not deter you from seeking quality legal aid we offer at Carlson Bier. Our initial consultations are always free; plus, our modus operandi involves working on a contingency basis i.e., payment becomes due only when we secure compensation for you. Thus our services provide dual benefits – convenience and expert representation with no upfront cost nor hidden fees.

Do remember that time is of essence in personal injury cases involving bicycle accidents. To fully preserve your rights under Illinois law and navigate settlement complexities professionally, engaging legal assistance promptly after an accident can be critically important for claim outcomes.

With meticulous attention to each client’s unique circumstances, Carlson Bier unfolds superior advocacy designed just for you. Let us focus all our energy into securing restitution while you concentrate on rehabilitation from injuries suffered in a bicycle accident in Illinois.

In closing, isn’t it imperative knowing exactly how much your case could potentially be worth? Well then…don’t let this moment linger! Press the button below NOW and receive a custom analysis – tailored by one of the finest personal injury attorney groups in Illinois – right here at Carlson Bier…because justice matters!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Grayslake Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Grayslake

Areas of Practice in Grayslake

Cycling Mishaps

Proficient in legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or perilous conditions.

Fire Damages

Offering specialist legal assistance for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Hospital Incompetence

Offering dedicated legal assistance for persons affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Obligation

Managing cases involving unsafe products, extending professional legal guidance to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Neglect

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble & Trip Injuries

Specialist in managing stumble accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking redress for their harm.

Infant Harms

Extending legal aid for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Collisions

Incidents: Devoted to assisting victims of car accidents receive appropriate settlement for wounds and harm.

Motorcycle Crashes

Specializing in providing legal assistance for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

Truck Collision

Offering professional legal assistance for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for hurts.

Construction Site Accidents

Concentrated on advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Cerebral Injuries

Committed to extending dedicated legal support for persons suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Injuries

Specialized in dealing with cases for persons who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Expert in legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Unfair Death

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and professional legal services to ensure fairness.

Vertebral Harm

Focused on advocating for patients with paralysis, offering specialized legal representation to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer