FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Grayslake

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve been affected by a dog bite injury in Grayslake, Illinois, choosing Carlson Bier can prove to be the best decision for yourself and your family. Specializing in personal injury cases, our skilled attorneys demonstrate an unrivaled depth of understanding when it comes to navigating complex legal matters surrounding dog bite incidents. We meticulously fight for victim rights, identifying all potential sources of liability. Our firm’s diligent approach consistently delivers just compensation that covers your medical expenses, psychological distress and any loss of wages due to such injuries. Trusting Carlson Bier means entrusting your case with professionals who are strongly committed to protecting those impacted by dog bites through their efficient representation services provided across Illinois – we take pride in having successfully fought numerous dog bite cases throughout our years practicing law in this area – reinforcing why grayslake victims turn towards us when they require superior legal counsel following a catastrophic canine attack incident.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Grayslake Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we comprehend that Dog Bite Injuries can be intensely traumatic and debilitating occurrences for victims. As experienced Illinois personal injury attorneys, it is our duty to ensure you are equipped with quality information on this grave issue. We also pledge to offer unrivalled legal representation if you have unfortunately become a victim.

Dog bites can occur due to various reasons but regardless of the cause, they always precipitate physical and emotional suffering. These consequences frequently entail significant financial burden prompted by medical expenses and lost wages during recovery periods. It’s imperative thus to know that under Illinois Animal Control Act, dog owners are fully liable for any harm their pets inflict unless the victim was provoking the animal or trespassing private property.

• The owner does not need prior knowledge of the dog being aggressive.

• Victims do not need to prove negligence on part of the dog owner.

• Provocation doesn’t include cases where a child below 5 years was involved.

Further, potential complications arising from these injuries make pursuing legal redress crucial in protecting your interests – whether they manifest immediately after attack or later down the line.

Consequently, hiring an adept personal injury attorney is paramount for successful navigation through complex litigation processes. Attorneys from Carlson Bier will diligently work on your behalf offering expert advice and advocating for rightful compensation as per your unique situation, guiding you through every stage of your case whilst affording much-needed peace of mind during such challenging times.

We take pride in having mastered intricate details governed under The One Bite Rule prevalent in some states which contradicts laws applied within Illinois jurisdiction. Awareness about these nuances assists us while handling varied scenarios ensuring personalized and comprehensive services offered to our clients remain unmatched and above par consistently.

• Statutory time limits associated with filing injury claims

• Implications tied up with comparative fault rules

• Effectiveness of using ‘Negligence Per Se’ argument

The intertwining nature of both local ordinances alongside Illinois leash laws further permits us in exploring additional channels of compensation for our clients. It has also enabled our firm to achieve an extensive record of verdicts and settlements, maximizing benefits flowing towards the victims.

Lastly, we believe that educating potential clients about their rights constitutes as crucial an aspect of our service as representing them in courts. At Carlson Bier, we promote transparency creating informed individuals who can make conscious decisions with regard to their plight. To this end, we offer a free case valuation feature on our website.

Understanding what your case might be worth might be difficult without professional guidance – circumstances surrounding each incident play integral roles in determining settlement amounts or court awards. These factors encompass severity of injuries sustained; physical and emotional distress inflicted; effect on future capacity to earn; deciphering whether pain and suffering damages apply among other considerations.

By clicking the button below, you will initiate steps towards obtaining clear insights into what your case exactly can translate into financially. The step masks no obligations but seeks to pass invaluable knowledge allowing reasoned choices pertinent to dog bite injury lawsuits enhancing your position significantly regardless of subsequent decisions made.

Enlist Carlson Bier’s expertise today and trust us in delivering comprehensive legal solutions tailored for you – whether the calibrated path involves settlement negotiations or courtroom litigation, count on us for unwavering commitment aimed at aligning your interests served within rightful justice bounds crafted under dedicated personal injury law capstones laid down by Illinois statutes.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Grayslake Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Grayslake

Areas of Practice in Grayslake

Bike Collisions

Proficient in legal services for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or risky conditions.

Flame Damages

Giving adept legal assistance for patients of intense burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Medical Misconduct

Providing dedicated legal assistance for persons affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Liability

Handling cases involving unsafe products, offering professional legal support to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Mistreatment

Advocating for the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Slip and Fall Occurrences

Specialist in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking justice for their injuries.

Birth Traumas

Supplying legal support for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Crashes: Concentrated on aiding clients of car accidents obtain reasonable recompense for hurts and losses.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Focused on providing legal advice for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Truck Collision

Extending expert legal representation for persons involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for losses.

Building Site Accidents

Dedicated to supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Cerebral Injuries

Expert in offering specialized legal representation for patients suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Wounds

Specialized in tackling cases for individuals who have suffered harms from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Incidents

Committed to legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Wrongful Demise

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and professional legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Harm

Expert in defending persons with spinal cord injuries, offering expert legal support to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440