FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Motorcycle Accident Attorney in Grayslake

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering a motorcycle accident can be both traumatic and life-altering. Amid physical recovery, pursuing legal redress may seem daunting; that’s when you need the experienced attorneys at Carlson Bier by your side. This distinguished firm is adept at handling motorcycle accident claims across Illinois, providing personalized support and relentless representation to affected individuals. Recognizing Grayslake’s vibrant motorcycling community, Carlson Bier offers their comprehensive services relevant to this enclave as well. They understand the unique challenges facing motorcyclists in navigating state laws and insurance processes consequent to an unfortunate eventuality on the roadways of Illinois including Grayslake area . Fortunately, these seasoned lawyers leverage deep domain knowledge combined with forensic acumen for compelling case presentation ensuring maximum possible compensation claim success rate for their clients within regulatory confines . Choose peace of mind by entrusting your case to Carlson Bier – dependable advocates committed to delivering justice in the complex realm of motorcycle accidents litigation across Illinois.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Motorcycle Accident Lawyers in Grayslake Illinois

Motorcycle accidents are notorious for resulting in serious, life-changing injuries. At Carlson Bier, our Personal Injury Attorneys take motorcycle accident cases seriously. As a renowned law firm based in Illinois, we comprehend the often complicated dynamics surrounding these accidents and work passionately in seeking justice for victims.

Motorcyclist rights have to be safeguarded aggressively. You must remember that when you mount your two-wheeler on Illinois roads, you’re entitled to every protection provided under the law – just like any other motor vehicle user. If this right is compromised by another party’s negligence leading to an accident and subsequent injury, it results in a personal injury case where compensation can be sought.

• Evidence Collection: Valuable proof includes photos of the crash scene, eyewitness accounts, and police reports which play a critical role in building up a well-supported claim.

• Evaluating Damages: Our attorneys meticulously calculate all damages incurred including medical expenses, lost wages during recovery time or long-term disability periods – both present and future.

• Negotiating with Insurance Companies: We aim to shield our clients from being taken advantage by insurance adjusters who consistently try minimizing payouts on claims lodged against their policyholders.

It’s vital for anyone involved in a motorcycle accident to know what steps should immediately follow post occurrence of such unfortunate incident:

– Ensure everyone is safe

– Procure immediate medical attention

– Notify relevant authorities

– Begins documenting evidence

Understanding that motorcycle collisions take many forms – hit and runs; single-motorcycle crashes; intersection or road hazards causing crashes – Carlson Bier brings its decades-long ensemble experience into deploying innovative strategies designed specifically for each unique case type.

Although establishing negligence remains integral across all personal injury proceedings, demonstrating it varies from one state to another. In some instances, proving 100% responsibility of the negligent party isn’t mandatory while others necessitate entirely showing one party’s blamelessness whilst unequivocally marking out guilt on part of the other involved party. Sounds complex, isn’t it? However, you need not worry! At Carlson Bier, our personal injury attorneys remain at forefront edifying our patrons with requisite understanding and counsel to secure them their rightful compensation.

With an in-depth knowledge of Illinois Tort Law, compassionate client approach coupled with a vigorous determination, we help negotiate settlements or represent your interests in court, if necessary. By taking on your burden during this difficult time we allow you to focus on what’s most important – recovery.

Our dedication towards maintaining high standard service delivery is best testified by numerous favorable verdicts won for our clients who tend to develop long-standing relationships attributing to unwavering trust fostered over time.

Contemplating riding into the future without enduring the torment following an accident alone? Carlson Bier Personal Injury Attorneys are here to guide through every step ensuring you’re rightfully compensated thus restoring back equilibrium in your life. Remember – You don’t have to deal with such daunting ordeal single-handedly!

Seeking professional legal advice makes navigating subsequent process smoother whilst enhancing chances of claiming rightful motorcycle accident injury compensation. So why wait?

Click on the button below right away and embark upon path leading towards justice acquiring fair insight about how much your case could be worth! Know that when you choose Carlson Bier as your Personal Injury Attorney partner law firm – Your Fight becomes Ours too.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Grayslake Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Grayslake

Areas of Practice in Grayslake

Cycling Mishaps

Specializing in legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' indifference or hazardous conditions.

Burn Damages

Supplying professional legal advice for patients of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or negligence.

Healthcare Incompetence

Delivering dedicated legal assistance for clients affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Responsibility

Managing cases involving problematic products, offering specialist legal help to individuals affected by harmful products.

Elder Malpractice

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble & Slip Accidents

Expert in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking compensation for their harm.

Newborn Traumas

Delivering legal support for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Accidents: Committed to supporting victims of car accidents receive reasonable payout for damages and losses.

Motorcycle Incidents

Focused on providing legal assistance for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Semi Collision

Extending experienced legal advice for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for harms.

Construction Site Accidents

Concentrated on defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Head Injuries

Expert in offering expert legal assistance for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Harms

Specialized in tackling cases for persons who have suffered traumas from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Dedicated to legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Unjust Passing

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and experienced legal support to ensure justice.

Vertebral Harm

Dedicated to representing patients with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal services to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440