...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Greenfield

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the aftermath of a dog bite injury, your primary concern should be recovery. Allow Carlson Bier to handle the legal complexities that accompany these unfortunate incidents. As highly-skilled personal injury lawyers with an emphasis on Dog Bite Injuries in Greenfield, we understand the local litigation landscape well. We’ve represented clients who have experienced minor to severe damage from such encounters, ensuring they receive rightful compensation for medical bills and emotional distress caused by negligent pet owners. At Carlson Bier, we demand justice on your behalf via thorough investigations and aggressive negotiations or court representation when necessary. Each case is unique; therefore, you reap benefits from our customized approach combined with deep knowledge of Illinois laws governing Dog Bite Injuries lawsuits. Trust in our demonstrated commitment to securing successful outcomes as evidenced by numerous satisfied clients who once faced similar circumstances like yours today. With us at your side every step of the way, feel assured that Carlson Bier does not just work for you; we stand alongside you!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Greenfield Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the devastating aftermath of a dog bite injury. When you need counsel that stands with both compassion and conviction; our Illinois-based law firm offers exceptional expertise in personal injury claims. Dog bites often lead to severe injuries including puncture wounds, fractures, traumatic stress disorder and sometimes even nerve damage. Known for causing debilitating pain and distress, dog bite events are incredibly traumatic to victims.

• Carlson Bier specializes in handling dog bite case proceedings in a professional manner.

• Our team has a comprehensive understanding of animal attack litigation within Illinois.

• We provide extensive guidance throughout your claim process.

A crucial aspect worth discussing is the legal liability following a dog bite incident. Essentially, if the owner’s pet inflicts harm without provocation while an individual is on public or legally private property – then under the ‘strict liability’ rule of Illinois law, said owner will remain accountable for any ensuing damages as long as they were aware of their pet’s aggressive tendencies (although knowledge isn’t always required). Being alert about these regulations empowers you during the demanding journey towards attaining justice.

In negligence-based cases it must be proven that the defendant failed to exercise ‘reasonable care’ which resulted in individual harm orcontributed towards exacerbating preexisting condition(s).

• Demonstrating violation of leash laws might hold proof valuable within courtrooms.

• Establishing evidence concerning improper confining methods for animals may aid your case.

Being involved or affected by dog-related accidents makes working through a heap load of medical bills stressful enough let alone managing lost wages for time off work or grappling with latent psychological effects such as anxiety or phobias developed post-incident. Calculating damages for loss includes considering:

• Medical costs: These encompass initial emergency aid like suturing wounds

right down to aftercare measures such as counseling sessions.

• Loss in earnings: Any period taken off from work due to sustained injuries involving recovery downtime or psychological matters due to the traumatic event is accounted for.

• Pain and suffering: This subjective measure covers actual physical pain along with stress, fear and reduced quality of life.

At Carlson Bier, our resilience stems from empathizing with your struggle. We’re committed towards advocating client rights persistently and reinforcing their legal protection passionately. With unwavering dedication, we’ll stand by your side as you seek justice, ensuring that you receive rightful compensation for sustained damages.

Beyond dog bite incidents, our practice areas extend over a comprehensive range of personal injury claims; including those involving motor vehicle accidents or medical negligence among others. Having carved out dedicated specialization niches within diverse genres of personal injury law – our attorney’s bring distinguished experience in handling complex scenarios stringently while maintaining valuable client relationships through personalized one-on-one interaction.

• Navigating legal jargon can be understandably overwhelming. But rest assured – we’re here to guide you through each step of your litigation journey.

So why choose us? Our work ethic comprises thoughtful strategizing according to case specificities backed by diligent advocacy in courtrooms alongside fostering accessible communication every stepping stone along the way – which ultimately places us ahead within this niche field.

Reeling from the aftermath of a harrowing incident isn’t easy. But assessing where you legally stand shouldn’t further add to your burdens. Make use of our conveniently placed consultation services today by clicking on ‘Get My Case Worth’ below – because at Carlson Bier, we truly believe that knowledge empowers…and understanding fortifies resilience amidst adversity!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Greenfield Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Greenfield

Areas of Practice in Greenfield

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Proficient in legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Flame Damages

Extending adept legal assistance for patients of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or negligence.

Physician Misconduct

Ensuring specialist legal support for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Merchandise Fault

Handling cases involving defective products, providing specialist legal guidance to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Aged Neglect

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble & Trip Mishaps

Adept in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking compensation for their harm.

Newborn Traumas

Delivering legal assistance for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Car Mishaps

Crashes: Devoted to assisting victims of car accidents secure fair recompense for hurts and destruction.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Expert in providing legal assistance for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

Big Rig Accident

Providing specialist legal support for drivers involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for hurts.

Construction Accidents

Engaged in assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or recklessness.

Cognitive Harms

Dedicated to offering professional legal assistance for persons suffering from neurological injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Wounds

Skilled in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered wounds from dog bites or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Specializing in legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Fatality

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and professional legal assistance to ensure justice.

Neural Impairment

Expert in defending patients with spinal cord injuries, offering expert legal support to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​