...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Greenville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a dog bite injury in Greenville can be traumatic. During these difficult times, the legal counsel of Carlson Bier stands with you. As experienced Dog Bite Injury lawyers, we guide individuals through the complex claims process, ensuring their rights are fully protected under Illinois law. Even though our physical location isn’t in Greenville, we have arduously served clients across different cities over many years getting us well acquainted with intricacies specific to varying locations. Trained and dedicated toward clientele care; it is our relentless drive that makes every case count.

Trust us because Carlson Bier has proven adeptness handling these cases; determinedly fighting for victims to receive the compensation they deserve for medical bills, lost wages and suffering due to dog injuries. We provide detailed attention to each case ensuring that responsible parties are held accountable.

Navigating such dilemmas alone could be overwhelming; obtaining expert advice like Carlson Bier’s pays off immeasurably by safeguarding your interests thus weaving hope into the uneasy fabric of Dog Bite Injuries’ aftermath.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Greenville Illinois

Based in Illinois, Carlson Bier is your premier law firm specialized in handling personal injury cases, particularly with respect to Dog Bite Injuries. Our experienced and dedicated team of attorneys has successfully represented numerous clients suffering from dog bite injuries and helped them secure the rightful compensation they deserve for their pain, suffering, mental anguish as well as monetary losses.

Dog bites can be a traumatizing experience leading not only to physical wounds but also psychological distress that continues long after the visible scars have healed. Although we love them as our loyal companions, dogs are unpredictable animals that could lash out under specific circumstances causing considerable harm.

Several key factors contribute to the severity of dog bite injuries including the breed of the dog, its size, health condition as well as the location of the injury on your body. High-risk areas include face, neck, hands or arms which house important nerves and blood vessels increasing both immediate and long-term risks requiring prompt medical attention.

There’s also a significant legal aspect attached to such misfortunate incidents since animal owners bear direct responsibly for any harm caused by their pets. Therefore by law they are obligated to cover all related expenses incurred by someone bitten by their dog; this may encompass present & future medical bills along with compensation for pain & suffering.

At Carlson Bier we ensure:

– Comprehensive case evaluation capturing intricacies relevant to your distinct situation.

– Assessment and quantification of damages based on physical injuries sustained, emotional distress encountered along with loss in earning capacity if applicable.

– Engaging with medical experts when needed for defining extent of injury and possible future implications.

– Negotiation with relevant parties including insurance providers and pet owners aiming at securing maximum fair compensation without resorting to a lawsuit.

– Aggressive courtroom representation if settlement negotiation doesn’t result in satisfactory conclusion.

While it’s challenging dealing with aftermaths of a dog bite incident – negotiating for claim involving extensive paperwork coupled with technical jargons thrown around can make it an uphill battle to secure your legal rights. Leveraging extensive knowledge of personal injury laws and ample courtroom experience, attorneys at Carlson Bier make it a priority to walk our clients through every step of the claim process while ensuring they get adequate recovery time without worrying about the complexities of legal procedures.

It’s imperative to consult an expert in Dog Bite law even if your injuries may seem insignificant; underlying issues can surface later causing future health concerns. Injuries related to dog bites can have far reaching consequences than what meets the eye; they could range from puncture wounds, broken bones, nerve damage to infectious diseases.

The success rate digs deep down into understanding these intricacies coupled with sheer tenacity maintained throughout the course of trial and negotiation discussions; fundamentals that are ingrained in our modus operandi consistently delivered throughout our successful journey defending victims’ rights encompassing numerous cases involving dog bite incidents.

Moreover, time is vital when dealing with such cases because there are specific statutes on timeframe within which you should file for compensation failing which could lose you your rightful claim forever. So don’t wait till it’s too late! We invite you to click on the button below to find out how much your case is worth. Trust us – The consultation costs nothing but it definitely promises a step towards fair compensation! With Carlson Bier by your side, rest assured – You’ll never walk alone!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Greenville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Greenville

Areas of Practice in Greenville

Bicycle Crashes

Expert in legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' indifference or perilous conditions.

Thermal Burns

Offering professional legal help for individuals of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Healthcare Incompetence

Delivering expert legal services for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, providing skilled legal support to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Misconduct

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in care facilities environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip & Slip Injuries

Professional in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking recovery for their damages.

Neonatal Traumas

Providing legal help for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Collisions: Concentrated on assisting victims of car accidents secure reasonable remuneration for injuries and destruction.

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Focused on providing representation for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

Semi Incident

Delivering professional legal assistance for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for damages.

Construction Crashes

Committed to assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Traumas

Focused on providing dedicated legal support for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

K9 Assault Traumas

Specialized in managing cases for people who have suffered wounds from dog bites or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Incidents

Expert in legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Demise

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and adept legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Neural Damage

Focused on advocating for individuals with backbone trauma, offering expert legal support to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​